Donn Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thomas Graichen wrote:
one other thing: does anyone have the XFree86 pre 4.0 snapshot running
with moused and SysMouse ? - it works fine for me without moused and the
moues directly under X - but with moused and "SysMouse" "/dev/sysmouse&qu
Cliff Rowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings, I'm just wondering if anyone has encountered the following, and
what solutions you may have come up with / ideas you may have.
This may not be a FreeBSD problem, since I am using the latest XFree86
pre-4.0 snapshot.
First:
Almost every
Alexander Leidinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 28 Feb, Cliff Rowley wrote:
to site.def... Since posting my last mail, I've also encountered a
similar message, thie time reported by Imlib. It's not the exact same
message, but it's the same meaning. They are both having trouble getting
a
Cliff Rowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Second:
Using KDM in place of XDM, XFree86 just dies immediately, resulting in
several attempts at launching, and then a 30 second pause. XFree86 works
perfectly otherwise.
i see the same problem here (with an kde build outside of the ports
but with
somehow the neomagic audio driver seems to not work for the chips in
the sony n505x notebook which also has this chip - first the pci id's
are different
chip 8039104d class 0c0010 card 8060104d
chip 00101073 class 040100 card 805e104d
(at least that are the two unresolved pci chips on that
i'm currently trying to get the initio driver from initio ready for
-current and have it working fine with an u2w controller on one
machine (smp btw.) after finding out the COMPAT_PCI_DRIVER thing :-)
but still have problems with an 9100 utra controller on another
machine where i get:
the thing i found out with kdm was that it uses the wrong vty
i think - adding at vt09 to the Xservers file X line solved
it (i use x on console 9)
t
Marc Solsona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Both solutions seem to work with xdm, but not with wdm. It's not a big trauma
but may be I should contact
i just would like to know about the state of SOFTUPDATES in -current
and in -stable (are there differences ?) for heavy load situations ...
is anyone here running SOFTUPDATES in such situations without trouble ?
i'm asking because i noticed some problems then high load benchmarking
a FreeBSD
