+1 to this thankyou!
-adrian
On 26 October 2015 at 02:11, Hans Petter Selasky <h...@selasky.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have NO_MODULES for building kernel without modules, but no NO_KERNEL to
> only build the modules.
>
> What do you think about the following patch:
&g
On 26 October 2015 at 11:23, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 11:03:07AM -0700, John Baldwin wrote:
>> On Monday, October 26, 2015 10:11:43 AM Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > We have NO_MODULES for building kernel without modules, but no
Hm, poke glebius? He went and rototilled bits of net80211 recently and
that did touch the rc scripts.
-a
On 25 October 2015 at 12:20, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello freebsd-current,
>
>
> New version of -CURRENT try to configure wlan0 and run hostapd twice:
>
> Created
9:32 WPA: pairwise key handshake completed (RSN)
>>
>>
>> ^Celoop: could not process SIGINT or SIGTERM in two seconds. Looks like
>> there
>> is a bug that ends up in a busy loop that prevents clean shutdown.
>> Killing program forcefully.
>>
>>
Wait, there's a regression with wifi in -HEAD? What's the deal?
-a
On 16 October 2015 at 02:21, Olivier Cochard-Labbé wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 7:00 AM, Rui Paulo wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Please download and test the wpa_supplicant/hostapd import patch:
Hi!
I'm about to start merging in changes from Andriy that change how the
transmit path in net80211 works. Right now it's a holdover from the
old if_start style mechanism - a call to if_start() always consumed
the mbuf, even upon an error. He's changing it so upon error the
caller returns without
I think it's worth upping to an int type, so we can eventually up it to > 64k.
Please do submit diffs for revie.w :)
-a
On 9 October 2015 at 00:23, White Knight wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Back in 2012, raising the limit of kern.ipc.somaxcann was discussed (now
> properly called
Thanks for being quick and on the ball. I did another review of the
drivers to see which others needed fixing and luckily it was only
if_iwn.
-a
On 30 September 2015 at 05:54, David Wolfskill <da...@catwhisker.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 12:12:02PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wro
hi
(please subscribe and email freebsd-wireless@ these things, I'm more
likely to notice!)
It looks due to my recent taskqueue change for updateedca. I'll go fix
that today.
Thanks,
-a
On 29 September 2015 at 06:05, David Wolfskill wrote:
> No known/observed issues
. :)
-adrian
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
for older releases. Me, I'm a
"screw it, just support -HEAD, let the -stable community sort it out"
but I'm luckily not in charge of that. :)
It's coming along. They're just trying to do it all without breaking
existing stable users - this deserves massive thanks on their part.
run -HEAD on it. The wifi works great (it's atheros.)
All that's missing is haswell graphics.
-a
On 17 September 2015 at 11:23, Russell L. Carter wrote:
>
>
> On 09/17/15 10:40, Matthias Apitz wrote:
>>
>> El dÃa Thursday, September 17, 2015 a las 11:02:07AM -0400, Kris
Have you had a one-on-one with anyone at the foundation and expressed
your desires/concerns? You're a vendor after all...
-a
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any
oioo, would you please put that radeon patch into a review?
I have an older machine with a radeon card in it that doesn't yet
suspend/resume; I can now test it out!
-a
On 3 September 2015 at 10:50, Andriy Gapon <a...@freebsd.org> wrote:
> On 31/08/2015 11:53, Adrian Chadd wrot
Hi,
+glebius, as he recently messed around with the wifi stack and his
changes may have broken how mac addresses are assigned to the
hardware.
-adrian
On 31 August 2015 at 09:28, Ranjan1018 . <21474...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2015-08-31 10:53 GMT+02:00 Adrian Chadd <adrian.ch.
Hi,
Because it works by magic, not works by intent. There's no guarantee
that a STA device will let you re-program its MAC address.
It also confuses people when they believe you can setup things like
bridged VMs and they don't work across wifi but do across ethernet.
-adrian
On 31 August
ok, so this used to work before? And you're running -HEAD?
-a
On 31 August 2015 at 00:23, Ranjan1018 . <21474...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2015-08-30 17:12 GMT+02:00 Adrian Chadd <adrian.ch...@gmail.com>:
>>
>> hi,
>>
>> don'tr set ath0 to the MAC of your et
USB hardware into S3, but
the ACPI BIOS requested S2 and just hung if we had USB in S3. :(
-adrian
On 30 August 2015 at 23:33, Garrett Cooper <yaneurab...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Aug 30, 2015, at 23:13, Andriy Gapon <a...@freebsd.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
hi,
don'tr set ath0 to the MAC of your ethernet device, set your ethernet
MAC to the MAC of your atheros device.
(But I keep telling people, failover between ethernet/wifi isn't
supported by the wifi code...)
-a
On 30 August 2015 at 05:52, Ranjan1018 . 21474...@gmail.com wrote:
On my laptop
Hi,
has anyone asked dumbbell directly about it?
-a
On 30 August 2015 at 14:25, Slawa Olhovchenkov s...@zxy.spb.ru wrote:
On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 11:59:26PM +0300, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote:
Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote on 08/30/2015 22:17:
On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 09:58:31PM +0300, Ruslan
to update UPDATING with a notice so people aren't
(completely) confused by the new behaviour.
Thanks!
-adrian
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail
rc.conf changes aren't needed, just the scripts.
-a
On 28 August 2015 at 17:40, Rui Paulo rpa...@me.com wrote:
On Fri, 2015-08-28 at 17:07 -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Hi,
Gleb's wifi work is in -HEAD now. You'll notice that there's no wifi
parent ifnet device now - you have to clone them
Ah, cool. I'll give it a whirl.
I'm a little worried about having all of the other cores spinning in
this case (mostly thermal; the machines get VERY LOUD when the CPUs
are spinning..)
-a
On 21 August 2015 at 08:19, Eric van Gyzen vangy...@freebsd.org wrote:
I mentioned this to Adrian
I just hit this; i'll hit up gjb@ about it.
-a
On 20 August 2015 at 19:04, Outback Dingo outbackdi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 11:30 AM, Allan Jude allanj...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 2015-08-20 21:04, Keynes Augusto wrote:
The ISO (r286893/r284969) does not create the
[snip]
and if you're interested in doing some stuff with the scheduler and
interrupt handling then please poke jhb/i.
-adrian
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send
this? Does anyone
have any ideas?
-adrian
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
.. then make it take a struct and a type flag. :P
Then you can extend it however you'd like.
-adrian
On 16 August 2015 at 07:26, Julian Elischer jul...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 8/15/15 1:39 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Friday, August 14, 2015 10:46:10 PM Julian Elischer wrote:
I would like
Hi,
Gleb/others doing this: you have 4 days to figure out what's wrong
with things, or I'm backing all of this work out.
Thanks,
-adrian
On 7 August 2015 at 08:52, O. Hartmann ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote:
Am Thu, 6 Aug 2015 18:13:55 +0300
Gleb Smirnoff gleb...@freebsd.org schrieb
is it easily reproducable for you there?
-a
On 7 August 2015 at 18:04, Larry Rosenman l...@lerctr.org wrote:
Trying to debug TimeWarner IPV6 to my HE.NET tunnel, and running traceroute6,
got the following panic:
borg.lerctr.org dumped core - see /var/crash/vmcore.0
Fri Aug 7 19:58:40
are the syscalls. I'll try to address that next week.
As for what you saw - that's odd; I've not seen that before. How are
you building things? What are you building?
-adrian
On 2 August 2015 at 12:59, Lev Serebryakov l...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hello Freebsd-current,
Buildworld for r286209 failed
Yes it is; it just needs review, fixing and committing. :)
-a
On 30 July 2015 at 07:24, Kubilay Kocak ko...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 31/07/2015 12:06 AM, Bryan Venteicher wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Eliezer Croitoru elie...@ngtech.co.il
wrote:
I am testing couple VMs under kvm
Is this still happening for you?
-a
On 24 July 2015 at 06:03, David Wolfskill da...@catwhisker.org wrote:
On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 11:36:00AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote:
On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 10:24:11AM -0600, Ian Lepore wrote:
...
Was there anything (at all) in /var/log/messages
There's some way in stable/10 and -head to get it to install debug
symbols for things. Maybe it's only libraries, but you'll at least
want that in there so you can get stack traces through libc.
-adrian
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
On 28 July 2015 at 10:31, David Chisnall thera...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 28 Jul 2015, at 18:23, Adrian Chadd adrian.ch...@gmail.com wrote:
(What would be nice is having kqueue know about conditionals, so we
can sleep on a cond as well as a kqueue fd+queue, but I can't have
everything I want
There's a kqueue notification mechanism just for this very thing.
(What would be nice is having kqueue know about conditionals, so we
can sleep on a cond as well as a kqueue fd+queue, but I can't have
everything I want..)
-adrian
On 28 July 2015 at 05:19, Luigi Rizzo ri...@iet.unipi.it wrote
On 28 July 2015 at 10:42, David Chisnall thera...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 28 Jul 2015, at 18:33, Adrian Chadd adrian.ch...@gmail.com wrote:
Windows has had this for years. It makes async network programming
with thread worker queues significantly less abusive.
Can you do the same with Solaris
On 28 July 2015 at 16:09, David Wolfskill da...@catwhisker.org wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 04:05:33PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Is this still happening for you?
g1-245(10.2-P)[4] ls -lT /S4/ntpd.core
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 13783040 Jul 28 04:56:28 2015 /S4/ntpd.core
Apparently
Yes, I think the FreeBSD developers have been doing this since before
Redhat was a thing.
-a
On 20 July 2015 at 23:02, Venkat Duvvuru
venkatkumar.duvv...@avagotech.com wrote:
Yes, my question was about kernel module compatibililty with FreeBSD's
major releases of a particular version.
For
I'm really confused. Why is the active flag not set again?
I thought that was the whole point of the active flag in the partition table.
-a
On 13 July 2015 at 08:54, Allan Jude allanj...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 2015-07-13 11:19, Warren Block wrote:
Needing the active flag set is indeed a
Hi,
But the problem here is that we're using GPT but /not/ UEFI, right?
That's why that's all a mess?
-adrian
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail
in my endless tinderbox run;
I know the crossbuilds succeeded with r284913.
Yeah, crossbuilds work fine. It's the actual run-on-real-hardware bit
that doesn't.
(powerpc64 runs fine in qemu-devel; people should try it!)
-adrian
—
Bjoern A. Zeeb Charles
+ make -j 4 CROSS_TOOLCHAIN=amd64-gcc buildworld
__MAKE_CONF=/builds/FreeBSD_HEAD_amd64_gcc4.9/make.conf
make: /builds/FreeBSD_HEAD_amd64_gcc4.9/Makefile line 102: Malformed
conditional (${MK_META_MODE} == yes)
?
On 14 June 2015 at 02:45, jenkins-ad...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hi
,
Thanks. It didn't look like it even attempted to transmit on the 5ghz
band at all (no SCAN - AUTH, then xmit attempts.)
-a
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send
.
-adrian
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Hi,
This patch:
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Sigh.
This patch:
https://people.freebsd.org/~adrian/net80211/20150524-iwn-delay-xmit-passive-1.diff
along with the latest net80211 tree in -HEAD will buffer frames until
the first beacon is received after association. It doesn't (yet!)
purge frames in all the right places, but it should
On 22 May 2015 at 00:00, Stefan Parvu spa...@kronometrix.org wrote:
Does -HEAD do the same thing still?
I tried that couple of days back. Yes, same problem: blank screen, no
luck with any settings like backlight. I can easily ssh and reboot or
CTRL-ALT-F1 and CTRL-C and reboot (you see
Hi,
That fix came from the linux commit hash i mentioned in the commit.
I found the backlight tunable in the i915 source. :)
(My asus zenbook works with that in -head, btw. But I dn't have
acpi_asus_wmi loaded.)
-adrian
On 22 May 2015 at 01:39, Johannes Jost Meixner x...@freebsd.org wrote
buys me one so I
can tinker with it, you're going to have to wait for the next drm2
update to more recent Linux code.
-adrian
On 21 May 2015 at 20:45, Johannes Jost Meixner x...@freebsd.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi Adrian,
Stefan is seeing the same issue I've
And they're $900 on amazon, sorry :(
(My Zenbook works fine, but it's not exactly the same.)
Does -HEAD do the same thing still?
-a
On 21 May 2015 at 21:57, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hi,
I don't know . Unfortunately the drm2 update landed in between some
backlight changes
Hi,
I have the following compile error with gcc-4.9. Is there an issue
with the macro/inline, or is it just dead code?
--- citrus_prop.So ---
/usr/local/bin/mips-portbld-freebsd11.0-gcc -isystem
/home/adrian/work/freebsd/head-embedded/obj-gcc/mips.mips/usr/home/adrian/work/freebsd/head-embedded
Hi,
here's a patch against -head that eliminates gcc-4.9 complaining about
set-but-unused variables. It just comments them out for now - are
these okay to eliminate, or is there something else that's
broken/missing?
Thanks!
-adrian
adrian@lucy-11i386:~/work/freebsd/head-embedded/src/lib % svn
On 20 May 2015 at 17:30, Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 12:11 AM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hi,
here's a patch against -head that eliminates gcc-4.9 complaining about
I've set up a Jenkins build of trunk using gcc 4.9:
https
On 20 May 2015 at 00:50, Konstantin Belousov kostik...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 12:11:08AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Hi,
here's a patch against -head that eliminates gcc-4.9 complaining about
set-but-unused variables. It just comments them out for now - are
these okay
On 19 May 2015 at 11:42, Luigi Rizzo ri...@iet.unipi.it wrote:
While trying to compile some of my (kernel) code in different environments,
i noticed a couple of errors that perhaps might be worth fixing
- extra semicolons. These come either from explicit repetitions in the code
(see the
faster analysis rather than just numbers thrown
around.
-adrian
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
So I'm curious - why's it faster?
-adrian
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
[snip]
fixed!
-a
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
helpful. :)
-adrian
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
hi,
Hm, should we be upping this limit automatically? Can we get cpu
counts or memory amount early enough in boot to have a hope of
auto-tuning?
64 seems low, 1024 seems high as a default. :)
-adrian
On 24 March 2015 at 13:00, Keith White kwh...@site.uottawa.ca wrote:
On Tue, 24 Mar 2015
On 23 April 2015 at 00:22, Slawa Olhovchenkov s...@zxy.spb.ru wrote:
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 12:20:14AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Yeah, on stable/10. But on -HEAD it's different. There's two entries -
one for d3_01 and one for d3_03.
What CPU model?
CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 v2
if
the counters are active.
Ivybridge - the v1 and v2 chips have different local/remote dram
counters, and on my v2 setup there's actually /two/ LOCAL_DRAM:
adrian@testbox1:~/git/github/erikarn/freebsd/sys/dev/hwpmc %
pmccontrol -L | grep DRAM
MEM_LOAD_UOPS_LLC_MISS_RETIRED.LOCAL_DRAM
Yeah, on stable/10. But on -HEAD it's different. There's two entries -
one for d3_01 and one for d3_03.
-adrian
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail
be happy with -Wall -Werror.)
-adrian
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
... why's stuff have to be complicated?
Win95 has minimal if any boot sector protection. Just go look at what
boot0cfg does, figure out which sector you have to read/modify/write,
and do that.
Of course, I'd also check first to ensure it's updating a freebsd
bootblock, or you may render a
Hi,
You can just write a little command line win32 program that writes to
the boot blocks. it's win95; unless your BIOS somehow is blocking
things you should be able to set the same area that boot0cfg does to
tell the bootloader about what to do.
-adrian
On 8 April 2015 at 12:30, Ryan Stone
.
.. and that's still a thing, btw.
-adrian
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
You mean, like sourceforge offered in 2000? :)
-a
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Hi,
Would you mind filing a PR for it so it isn't forgotten?
-a
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
, or they provide basic BIOS services for it) then
it'll eventually happen.
-adrian
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr
Which intel chipset is in that thing?
-a
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Ok, so how do we reduce the amount of FPU save and restores, or make
them cheaper?
-a
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
Oh, in that case, someone should send me one so I can use it to verify
that my frame-buffer bootloader hack will work correctly on it.
Then yeah, we won't have to worry about such evil BIOSes.
-adrian
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http
.
-adrian
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
hi,
please don't try to microoptimise crap like strlen().
The TL;DR for performant high-throughput code is: if strlen() or
memcpy() is the thing that's costing you the most, you're doing it
wrong.
-adrian
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
On 27 March 2015 at 16:03, Alan Somers asom...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
hi,
please don't try to microoptimise crap like strlen().
The TL;DR for performant high-throughput code is: if strlen() or
memcpy() is the thing that's
Hi!
Please file a bug! https://bugs.freebsd.org/submit/
Thanks!
-a
On 19 March 2015 at 09:31, Alexandre Martins
alexandre.mart...@stormshield.eu wrote:
Hi !
I found a leak of mbuf in the lagg driver :
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/sys/net/if_lagg.c?view=annotate#l1672
Is there a PR filed with this?
-a
On 26 March 2015 at 14:00, Jakob Alvermark ja...@alvermark.net wrote:
On Tue, March 24, 2015 00:29, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
Hi,
Without the attached kernel patch(es), Xorg starts consuming alot of CPU
and becomes very unresponsive and unusable.
... what about if lagg is not at all involved?
-a
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
No, it's something in the ath driver and ath_hal code.
I'm sorry, I've been busy debugging other things in my limited spare
time; I just haven't had the chance to sit down and look at the rfkill
code. :(
-a
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
ok, then hm, where's the gpio pin configured..
-a
On 21 March 2015 at 21:55, Miguel Clara miguelmcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On March 22, 2015 4:19:23 AM WET, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
Ok, so I'd cycle that rfkill gpio from 1 - uhm, whatever the max for
that thing is (16?)
Each
Hi,
It may be rfkill then. It may be that there's a GPIO pin wired up
somewhere that needs updating. Erk.
Someone buy me one of these laptops so I can see what's going on? :)
-a
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
On 21 March 2015 at 17:33, Miguel Clara miguelmcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hi,
It may be rfkill then. It may be that there's a GPIO pin wired up
somewhere that needs updating. Erk.
Someone buy me one of these laptops so I
Ok, so I'd cycle that rfkill gpio from 1 - uhm, whatever the max for
that thing is (16?)
Each time:
ifconfig wlan0 down
sysctl dev.ath.0.rfkill=X
ifconfig wlan0 up
ifconfig wlan0 list scan
See if it sees anything.
-adrian
___
freebsd-current
0x7fff mindwell 0
maxdwell 0 nssid 1
wlan0: ieee80211_check_scan: active scan, append, nojoin, once
wlan0: sta_pick_bss: no scan candidate
The system kept on printing these messages until I rebooted this machine
back to Windows (in order to write this reply).
On 3/20/2015 8:02 PM, Adrian
at 11:21, Miguel Clara miguelmcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 6:01 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 20 March 2015 at 09:52, Anders Bolt-Evensen andersb...@icloud.com
wrote:
Hello!
Recently I had to buy a new computer as my Mac broke down.
I ended up with an Acer
: 0x; 5GHz radio: 0x
I'm using FreeBSD 11-CURRENT with sources updated today.
What else does it log?
-adrian
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail
[snip]
Hihi!
Do you have a shell script or something that I can run on the power8
box to see if nathan's pmap locking changes eliminate at least that
global pmap lock we're seeing on amd64?
-a
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
[snip]
So yes, I'd like to see this in -HEAD sooner rather than later. You
did the great work of chasing it down, so let's get it in -HEAD. :)
-a
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To
afraid of kernel ABI
changes that fix actual bugs.
-adrian
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
[snip]
someone emailed me privately - no tracking/priority lending is
happening for readers. :(
-a
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
Again, why's it not loaning priority to the lock-owning thread when
it's blocked? I thought that's what is supposed to happen.
-adrian
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
Do you have access to any boxes that have more than 12 cores?
(like 36, 64, 80+ ?)
-adrian
On 12 March 2015 at 08:14, Ryan Stone ryst...@gmail.com wrote:
I've just submitted a patch to Differential[1] for review that converts the
VFS cache to use an rmlock in place of the current rwlock
Also, to ask a stupid question - why wasn't the reader gifted a
temporary priority boost because you were trying to acquire the write
lock?
-adrian
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
.. we can/should do both.
Just make sure the json/html/xml output is versioned, otherwise you're
going to end up with /exactly the same problems/ you have with the
current format.
-adrian
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http
; or seconds if things are really backed up.
Using wire instead of hold definitely made things work without having
the page disappear from underneath it. Oleksander knows more about the
details of that.
-adrian
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing
happen.
Yup, and that's what I'm worried about :(
-adrian
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
On 2 March 2015 at 15:05, K. Macy km...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 12:42 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hi,
gonzo@ committed a fix (r278615) to the videocore driver for the
raspberry pi. The fix involved doing an explicit wire of pages that
were about to be passed
done?
Thanks,
-adrian
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
. But BOOTSTRAPPING is fine.
-adrian
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
201 - 300 of 1325 matches
Mail list logo