On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 08:49:59PM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
Question: Does the rpcbind program in -current have the same problem
or has it already been fixed by whomever you imported the code from?
(If it hasn't been fixed I'll be happy to fix it. I'm hoping it has,
Ok guys. I just had to fix a problem with portmap in -stable related
to binding to specific IP addresses so replies to UDP packets come
'from' the proper IP address (for multi-homed hosts).
Question: Does the rpcbind program in -current have the same problem
or has it
Ok guys. I just had to fix a problem with portmap in -stable related
to binding to specific IP addresses so replies to UDP packets come
'from' the proper IP address (for multi-homed hosts).
This has been a problem with portmap for as long as I can remember (back
to the SunOS 3.5
:I hope you have commited it, or well soon, to -stable, as this one has
:surely been one to send many a young admin screaming from his cubicle
:yelling ``but it should work, it really should just work''.
Yah, it's in just under the wire. I was tearing my hair out today trying
to figure
Peter Wemm([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2001.03.28/06:24:34(epoch+985757074s):
FYI:
SYNOPSIS
portmap [-d] [-v]
SYNOPSIS
rpcbind [-dilLs]
yup, so i think it makes sense, to have the daemon called rpcbind, since
it would probably break other people's configuration after making world.
/k
I do not. -v could easily be added to what is now rpcbind (even if it
was ignored). -d mean the same thing for both. there's then no reason
to change its name.
Well, my feeling on the matter, since everyone gets to have an opinion
today, is that we should stick with rpcbind: it's what
Warner Losh([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 12:40:18AM -0700:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Greg Lehey writes:
: Play the ball, not the man.
:
: I don't have an objection to the change, I was just asking. And
: "because System V does it this way" has never been a good answer for
:
"Karsten W. Rohrbach" wrote:
Warner Losh([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 12:40:18AM -0700:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Greg Lehey writes:
: Play the ball, not the man.
:
: I don't have an objection to the change, I was just asking. And
: "because System V does it this way"
Warner Losh wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Greg Lehey writes:
: Play the ball, not the man.
:
: I don't have an objection to the change, I was just asking. And
: "because System V does it this way" has never been a good answer for
: us. And no, I'm not picking on Doug, just making
Doug Barton([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 10:05:40AM -0800:
"Karsten W. Rohrbach" wrote:
Warner Losh([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 12:40:18AM -0700:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Greg Lehey writes:
: Play the ball, not the man.
:
: I don't have an objection
"Karsten W. Rohrbach" wrote:
the idea is, that if rpcbind takes parameters different from portmap it
would make sense to call rpcbind rpcbind because people's boxes will
start to barf when rpcbind is called portmap, they make world, and skip
reading the rpcbind paragraph in UPDATING ;-)
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 05:24:14PM +0930, Greg Lehey wrote:
On Sunday, 25 March 2001 at 23:48:10 -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
Greg Lehey wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 March 2001 at 10:44:38 -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
The Portmapper binary has been renamed from `portmap' to `rpcbind'.
Why?
On Monday, 26 March 2001 at 18:19:06 +1000, Andrew Reilly wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 05:24:14PM +0930, Greg Lehey wrote:
On Sunday, 25 March 2001 at 23:48:10 -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
Greg Lehey wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 March 2001 at 10:44:38 -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
The Portmapper
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Greg Lehey writes:
: Play the ball, not the man.
:
: I don't have an objection to the change, I was just asking. And
: "because System V does it this way" has never been a good answer for
: us. And no, I'm not picking on Doug, just making a point.
I see no reason
On Wednesday, 21 March 2001 at 10:44:38 -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
The Portmapper binary has been renamed from `portmap' to `rpcbind'.
Why?
Greg
--
Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for PGP public key
See complete headers for address and phone numbers
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Greg Lehey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010325 15:33] wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 March 2001 at 10:44:38 -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
The Portmapper binary has been renamed from `portmap' to `rpcbind'.
Why?
We've upgraded to Sun's TIRPC code, this includes rpcbind as a replacement
for portmapper.
--
Greg Lehey wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 March 2001 at 10:44:38 -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
The Portmapper binary has been renamed from `portmap' to `rpcbind'.
Why?
So we can be more like sysV
--
Perhaps the greatest damage the American system of education has done
to its
The Portmapper binary has been renamed from `portmap' to `rpcbind'.
The name change was taken care of in /etc/defaults/rc.conf and in the
auto-dependacy code in /etc/rc.
HOWEVER, you may need to edit your /etc/hosts.allow and make the name
change there.
--
-- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
18 matches
Mail list logo
