Re: [CRASH] ZFS recv (fwd)/CURRENT

2013-04-05 Thread Matthew Ahrens
I am working on integrating a fix into illumos. FYI, the patch you attached will not quite work, because you are using different tags to hold and release the dataset (FTAG is a macro which has a calling-function-specific value). --matt On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Martin Matuska wrote: > Y

Re: [CRASH] ZFS recv (fwd)/CURRENT

2013-04-05 Thread Larry Rosenman
On 2013-04-05 14:07, Matthew Ahrens wrote: I am working on integrating a fix into illumos.  FYI, the patch you attached will not quite work, because you are using different tags to hold and release the dataset (FTAG is a macro which has a calling-function-specific value). --matt Might this als

Re: [CRASH] ZFS recv (fwd)/CURRENT

2013-04-05 Thread Martin Matuska
This is a patch against -CURRENT, so the receiving side in your case. On 5.4.2013 18:31, Larry Rosenman wrote: > On 2013-04-05 11:29, Martin Matuska wrote: >> You can use the attached patch, it should fix the problem. >> We are still waiting for code review and a final solution by illumos, >> mayb

Re: [CRASH] ZFS recv (fwd)/CURRENT

2013-04-05 Thread Larry Rosenman
On 2013-04-05 11:29, Martin Matuska wrote: You can use the attached patch, it should fix the problem. We are still waiting for code review and a final solution by illumos, maybe I will commit this preliminary (or final) fix to head. Which side does this need to be on? (sending? (since it's dmu

Re: [CRASH] ZFS recv (fwd)/CURRENT

2013-04-05 Thread Martin Matuska
You can use the attached patch, it should fix the problem. We are still waiting for code review and a final solution by illumos, maybe I will commit this preliminary (or final) fix to head. mm On 5.4.2013 16:49, Larry Rosenman wrote: > On 2013-04-02 16:26, Martin Matuska wrote: >> On 1. 4. 2013 2

Re: [CRASH] ZFS recv (fwd)/CURRENT

2013-04-05 Thread Larry Rosenman
On 2013-04-02 16:26, Martin Matuska wrote: On 1. 4. 2013 22:33, Martin Matuska wrote: This error seems to be limited to sending deduplicated streams. Does sending without "-D" work ok? This might be a vendor error as well. On 1.4.2013 20:05, Larry Rosenman wrote: Re-Sending. Any ideas, guys/g

Re: [CRASH] ZFS recv (fwd)/CURRENT

2013-04-02 Thread Larry Rosenman
On 2013-04-02 16:26, Martin Matuska wrote: On 1. 4. 2013 22:33, Martin Matuska wrote: This error seems to be limited to sending deduplicated streams. Does sending without "-D" work ok? This might be a vendor error as well. On 1.4.2013 20:05, Larry Rosenman wrote: Re-Sending. Any ideas, guys/g

Re: [CRASH] ZFS recv (fwd)/CURRENT

2013-04-02 Thread Martin Matuska
On 1. 4. 2013 22:33, Martin Matuska wrote: > This error seems to be limited to sending deduplicated streams. Does > sending without "-D" work ok? This might be a vendor error as well. > > On 1.4.2013 20:05, Larry Rosenman wrote: >> Re-Sending. Any ideas, guys/gals? >> >> This really gets in my way

Re: [CRASH] ZFS recv (fwd)/CURRENT

2013-04-01 Thread Martin Matuska
This error seems to be limited to sending deduplicated streams. Does sending without "-D" work ok? This might be a vendor error as well. On 1.4.2013 20:05, Larry Rosenman wrote: > Re-Sending. Any ideas, guys/gals? > > This really gets in my way. > -- Martin Matuska FreeBSD committer http://blog.