On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 11:34:34AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday, June 14, 2011 10:44:18 am Alexey Shuvaev wrote:
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 03:11:02PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Monday, May 23, 2011 10:39:02 am John Baldwin wrote:
This small patch makes the puc(4) bus drivers a
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 03:11:02PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Monday, May 23, 2011 10:39:02 am John Baldwin wrote:
This small patch makes the puc(4) bus drivers a little more friendly. It
should now list the port for each child device in the boot messages, and
devinfo -v should list
On Tuesday, June 14, 2011 10:44:18 am Alexey Shuvaev wrote:
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 03:11:02PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Monday, May 23, 2011 10:39:02 am John Baldwin wrote:
This small patch makes the puc(4) bus drivers a little more friendly. It
should now list the port for each
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 15:11:02 -0400 John Baldwin wrote:
On Monday, May 23, 2011 10:39:02 am John Baldwin wrote:
This small patch makes the puc(4) bus drivers a little more friendly. It
should now list the port for each child device in the boot messages, and
devinfo -v should list the
On Tuesday, June 14, 2011 12:56:31 pm Boris Samorodov wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 15:11:02 -0400 John Baldwin wrote:
On Monday, May 23, 2011 10:39:02 am John Baldwin wrote:
This small patch makes the puc(4) bus drivers a little more friendly. It
should now list the port for each child
On Monday, May 23, 2011 10:39:02 am John Baldwin wrote:
This small patch makes the puc(4) bus drivers a little more friendly. It
should now list the port for each child device in the boot messages, and
devinfo -v should list the type and port of each child device in its output
as
well:
This small patch makes the puc(4) bus drivers a little more friendly. It
should now list the port for each child device in the boot messages, and
devinfo -v should list the type and port of each child device in its output as
well:
Index: puc_pci.c