Re: [Patch] mdmfs currently broken

2003-09-05 Thread Bruce Evans
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Stefan =?iso-8859- 1?Q?E=DFer?= writes: Seems that mdmfs stopped working recently (probably because of GEOM related changes). One possible fix is to label the md and newfs the thusly created c partition. This

Re: [Patch] mdmfs currently broken

2003-09-05 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Bruce Evans writes: We should not revert to putting BSD labels on everything. Disk labels are required by the not unused fsck_ffs utility to search for alternate superblocks. You mean: The widely used fsck_ffs utility is able to use information from the optional

Re: [Patch] mdmfs currently broken

2003-09-05 Thread Bruce Evans
On Fri, 5 Sep 2003, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Bruce Evans writes: We should not revert to putting BSD labels on everything. Disk labels are required by the not unused fsck_ffs utility to search for alternate superblocks. You mean: The widely used fsck_ffs

[Patch] mdmfs currently broken

2003-09-04 Thread Stefan Eßer
Seems that mdmfs stopped working recently (probably because of GEOM related changes). One possible fix is to label the md and newfs the thusly created c partition. This requires running /sbin/disklabel, which didn't have an entry in paths.h. Any objections against me committing the follwoing

Re: [Patch] mdmfs currently broken

2003-09-04 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Stefan =?iso-8859- 1?Q?E=DFer?= writes: Seems that mdmfs stopped working recently (probably because of GEOM related changes). One possible fix is to label the md and newfs the thusly created c partition. This requires running /sbin/disklabel, which didn't have an