On Fri Feb 4 11, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 10:53 PM, Roman Divacky rdiva...@freebsd.org wrote:
alex,
I think you are the kind of person to try out
http://code.google.com/p/include-what-you-use/
with fbsd :)
Please be careful with this tool though. There's
I see it crashes very early on ;)
can you report:
Assertion failed: (isValid()), function getSpellingLoc, file
SourceLocation.cpp, line 84.
this stuff to the developers? the tool looks pretty useful
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 11:58:27AM +, Alexander Best wrote:
On Fri Feb 4 11, Garrett
On Sat Feb 5 11, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On Fri, 4 Feb 2011 20:19:48 +, Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Fri Feb 4 11, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday, February 03, 2011 5:12:57 pm Alexander Best wrote:
hi everybody,
i've started to check the source for broken includes,
On Sat Feb 5 11, Roman Divacky wrote:
alex,
I think you are the kind of person to try out
http://code.google.com/p/include-what-you-use/
thanks. this is the first time i hear of this project. i'll try to get it up
and running.
with fbsd :)
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 10:12:57PM +,
On Fri Feb 4 11, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday, February 03, 2011 5:12:57 pm Alexander Best wrote:
hi everybody,
i've started to check the source for broken includes, such as the one fixed
in
r218189. so far i've run through arch=amd64 and found only two broken
includes,
which
On Fri, 4 Feb 2011 20:19:48 +, Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Fri Feb 4 11, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday, February 03, 2011 5:12:57 pm Alexander Best wrote:
hi everybody,
i've started to check the source for broken includes, such as the one fixed
in
r218189. so far i've
On Thu Feb 3 11, Alexander Best wrote:
hi everybody,
i've started to check the source for broken includes, such as the one fixed in
r218189. so far i've run through arch=amd64 and found only two broken
includes,
which should be fixed by the attached patch. the commands i'm using are:
On Thursday, February 03, 2011 5:12:57 pm Alexander Best wrote:
hi everybody,
i've started to check the source for broken includes, such as the one fixed in
r218189. so far i've run through arch=amd64 and found only two broken
includes,
which should be fixed by the attached patch. the
On Fri Feb 4 11, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday, February 03, 2011 5:12:57 pm Alexander Best wrote:
hi everybody,
i've started to check the source for broken includes, such as the one fixed
in
r218189. so far i've run through arch=amd64 and found only two broken
includes,
which
On Fri Feb 4 11, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday, February 03, 2011 5:12:57 pm Alexander Best wrote:
hi everybody,
i've started to check the source for broken includes, such as the one fixed
in
r218189. so far i've run through arch=amd64 and found only two broken
includes,
which
alex,
I think you are the kind of person to try out
http://code.google.com/p/include-what-you-use/
with fbsd :)
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 10:12:57PM +, Alexander Best wrote:
hi everybody,
i've started to check the source for broken includes, such as the one fixed in
r218189. so far
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 10:53 PM, Roman Divacky rdiva...@freebsd.org wrote:
alex,
I think you are the kind of person to try out
http://code.google.com/p/include-what-you-use/
with fbsd :)
Please be careful with this tool though. There's header pollution
in them thar c files (refer to
hi everybody,
i've started to check the source for broken includes, such as the one fixed in
r218189. so far i've run through arch=amd64 and found only two broken includes,
which should be fixed by the attached patch. the commands i'm using are:
for target=buildkernel:
make SRCCONF=/dev/null
13 matches
Mail list logo
