In message: <20100912170344.ga58...@freebsd.org>
Alexander Best writes:
: also i noticed that after keywords like "device" there're two tabs,
: whereas after the keyword "options" there's one space and a
: tab. since i don't know, if this was done on purpose i didn't change
: it.
It i
On Sun Sep 12 10, Marius Strobl wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 02:40:49AM +, Alexander Best wrote:
> > On Fri Sep 10 10, John Baldwin wrote:
> > > On Thursday, September 09, 2010 3:50:45 pm Alexander Best wrote:
> > > > On Thu Sep 9 10, Alexander Best wrote:
> > > > > On Thu Sep 9 10, Alexa
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 02:40:49AM +, Alexander Best wrote:
> On Fri Sep 10 10, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Thursday, September 09, 2010 3:50:45 pm Alexander Best wrote:
> > > On Thu Sep 9 10, Alexander Best wrote:
> > > > On Thu Sep 9 10, Alexander Best wrote:
> > > > > hi there,
> > > > >
>
On Fri Sep 10 10, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Thursday, September 09, 2010 3:50:45 pm Alexander Best wrote:
> > On Thu Sep 9 10, Alexander Best wrote:
> > > On Thu Sep 9 10, Alexander Best wrote:
> > > > hi there,
> > > >
> > > > except for arm most archs seem to enforce uart support in
> > > > co
On Fri Sep 10 10, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Thursday, September 09, 2010 3:50:45 pm Alexander Best wrote:
> > On Thu Sep 9 10, Alexander Best wrote:
> > > On Thu Sep 9 10, Alexander Best wrote:
> > > > hi there,
> > > >
> > > > except for arm most archs seem to enforce uart support in
> > > > co
On Thursday, September 09, 2010 3:50:45 pm Alexander Best wrote:
> On Thu Sep 9 10, Alexander Best wrote:
> > On Thu Sep 9 10, Alexander Best wrote:
> > > hi there,
> > >
> > > except for arm most archs seem to enforce uart support in conf/DEFAULTS.
> > > is
> > > this really necessary? shouldn
On Thu Sep 9 10, Alexander Best wrote:
> On Thu Sep 9 10, Alexander Best wrote:
> > hi there,
> >
> > except for arm most archs seem to enforce uart support in conf/DEFAULTS. is
> > this really necessary? shouldn't DEFAULTS only contain vital devices/options
> > without a kernel on a specific ar
On Thu Sep 9 10, Alexander Best wrote:
> hi there,
>
> except for arm most archs seem to enforce uart support in conf/DEFAULTS. is
> this really necessary? shouldn't DEFAULTS only contain vital devices/options
> without a kernel on a specific arch won't function at all?
jhb just explained to me,
hi there,
except for arm most archs seem to enforce uart support in conf/DEFAULTS. is
this really necessary? shouldn't DEFAULTS only contain vital devices/options
without a kernel on a specific arch won't function at all?
cheers.
alex
--
a13x
___
free