d.ie on Sat, Oct 27, 2001 at 07:48:13PM +0100
X-Echelon: BND CIA NSA Mossad KGB MI6 IRA detonator nuclear assault strike
On Sat, Oct 27, 2001 at 07:48:13PM +0100, David Malone wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 06:16:12PM +0200, Andrea Campi wrote:
> > Anybody has any idea how to properly fix?
>
>
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 06:16:12PM +0200, Andrea Campi wrote:
> Anybody has any idea how to properly fix?
Can you test the following patch?
David.
Index: uipc_usrreq.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/FreeBSD-CVS/src/sys/kern/uipc_usrre
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 06:30:47PM +0100, David Malone wrote:
> > Anyway, both ways I can trigger the bug (find . -type f | xargs mutt, and
> > actually running fetchmail -a) do generate a LOT of work, so it's actually
> > possible that your diagnosis (mbuf exhaustion) is correct; trouble is, this
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 07:12:24PM +0200, Andrea Campi wrote:
> I know. I'd like to look deeper into the issue, but from a quick glance at the
> code, I don't think I could figure out a way to separate those "things" and tr
> each one. Do you happen to have separate patches for them, that I could
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 05:52:37PM +0100, David Malone wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 06:16:12PM +0200, Andrea Campi wrote:
> > All my problems are now gone. This sort of makes sense to me, as the culprit,
> > qmail, is quite socket intensive.
> >
> > Anybody has any idea how to properly fix?
>
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 06:16:12PM +0200, Andrea Campi wrote:
> All my problems are now gone. This sort of makes sense to me, as the culprit,
> qmail, is quite socket intensive.
>
> Anybody has any idea how to properly fix?
This patch changed quite a few things, so it's not obvious exactly
what
Looks like the problem below is caused by this commit:
dwmalone2001/10/04 06:11:48 PDT
Modified files:
lib/libc/rpc clnt_vc.c svc_vc.c
sbin/mount_portalfs activate.c
sys/kern uipc_socket.c uipc_usrreq.c
sys/netgraph ng_socket.c
sys/sys
>
> I've just updated to -HEAD with this delta reverted and running a make
> buildkernel right now.
>
Looks like I spoke too soon; reverting just this delta wasn't enough. I'm back
to testing with all ACPI related work from Oct 04 08:32 rolled back; if it
works, I'll try to update each diff in
On 24-Oct-01 NAKAJI Hiroyuki wrote:
>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andrea Campi) wrote:
>
> AC> Anybody seen anything like this?
>
> Well, it may not be the case, but I have similar problem.
>
> In my case, just after login via xdm installed from
> port/x11/XFree86-4
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andrea Campi) wrote:
AC> Anybody seen anything like this?
Well, it may not be the case, but I have similar problem.
In my case, just after login via xdm installed from
port/x11/XFree86-4, load average gets very much increased up to about
Hi all,
I am trying to diagnose a problem I've been having for a few weeks (I didn't
report it earlier because I didn't have much time to hunt for it).
The symptom is a total system freeze, i.e. I can't get into DDB. I can repeat
it only with qmail, but of course I don't think it's qmail specifi
11 matches
Mail list logo
