On 11/01 07:39, Andreas Klemm wrote:
Where 4 MB isn't sufficient anymore with a GENERIC kernel. You need at least
6 MB or so to boot, then compile a custom kernel and then, if you are lucky,
can perhaps run with 4 MB.
Here are the two constituent process of a compilation spotted earlier
On Tue, Jan 11, 2000 at 07:39:40AM +0100, Andreas Klemm wrote:
On Mon, Jan 10, 2000 at 04:55:43PM +, George Cox wrote:
G'day,
While compiling a kernel today, I noticed that the '-pipe' option to gcc
was not being used. Is there any reason for this?
I think this is the
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Doug
Russell writes:
: See, I knew there was a reason I hung on to all these 1M 30 pin SIMMs. :)
: Old 386/40s sure make nice little router/modem/whatever boxes. :)
Until their hard disks go south :-(. The biggest problems I have with
them is that they also tend
On Tue, Jan 11, 2000 at 01:53:10PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Doug
Russell writes:
: See, I knew there was a reason I hung on to all these 1M 30 pin SIMMs. :)
: Old 386/40s sure make nice little router/modem/whatever boxes. :)
Until their hard disks go south
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Brooks Davis writes:
: On Tue, Jan 11, 2000 at 01:53:10PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Doug
:Russell writes:
: : See, I knew there was a reason I hung on to all these 1M 30 pin SIMMs. :)
: : Old 386/40s sure make nice little
On 2000-Jan-12 07:58:12 +1100, Brooks Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think that's why IBM has jumpers on some of their disks that limit
them to 2GB. I can't see why else you would want to take a perfectly
good 8GB+ disk and use it as a 2GB drive.
The volumes probably mean it's not
Before you ask, I've also tried to use the tapr[*] CF - IDE adapter to
see if I could get these systems to boot off a 16MB CF card with no
luck. I even have a mini486 based system from NEC that I bought
surplus that I thought could use the CF card, but no joy. Works great
on all the modern
On Tue, Jan 11, 2000 at 01:32:49PM -0700, Doug Russell wrote:
On Tue, 11 Jan 2000, Wilko Bulte wrote:
FWIW: 3.3R ran (crawled?) in 4Mb. I tried it 2 months ago on a 386SX40 with
4Mb.
Compiling a GENERIC kernel was 5 hours or so ;-) That is when I gave up
on my idea to 'make
On Tue, Jan 11, 2000 at 01:32:49PM -0700, Doug Russell wrote:
On Tue, 11 Jan 2000, Wilko Bulte wrote:
FWIW: 3.3R ran (crawled?) in 4Mb. I tried it 2 months ago on a 386SX40 with
4Mb.
Compiling a GENERIC kernel was 5 hours or so ;-) That is when I gave up
on my idea to 'make
G'day,
While compiling a kernel today, I noticed that the '-pipe' option to gcc
was not being used. Is there any reason for this?
best;
gjvc
--
[gjvc]
4.4BSD 4.ever!
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Mon, Jan 10, 2000 at 04:55:43PM +, George Cox wrote:
G'day,
While compiling a kernel today, I noticed that the '-pipe' option to gcc
was not being used. Is there any reason for this?
I think this is the (historical) default, so that people with
only 4-8 MB of RAM don't get into
11 matches
Mail list logo
