3.1 stable bootloader vs. 4.0 kernel...

1999-04-09 Thread Matthew Jacob
Did I miss something obvious here? I have a system over in England somewhere which I'm remotely booting. It's 3.1Stable. When I try and put a 4.0/-current kernel (which boots fine on *my* much overwritten and not reinstalled since 2.2.2 system), I get: Type '?' for a list of commands, 'help'

Re: 3.1 stable bootloader vs. 4.0 kernel...

1999-04-09 Thread Matthew Dillon
:Did I miss something obvious here? I have a system over in England :somewhere which I'm remotely booting. It's 3.1Stable. When I try and put a :4.0/-current kernel (which boots fine on *my* much overwritten and not :reinstalled since 2.2.2 system), I get: : :Type '?' for a list of commands,

Re: 3.1 stable bootloader vs. 4.0 kernel...

1999-04-09 Thread Matthew Jacob
Update your sources and install a new /boot. 4.x kernels need the latest boot code due to the kernel's new start address. Ah. Well, I'm fine at Feral where I do stuff- it's just an interesting gotcha for folks running 3.X now. To Unsubscribe: send mail to