Re: 4.0R ?

2000-03-14 Thread Peter Jeremy
On 2000-Mar-15 13:39:55 +1100, Anatoly Vorobey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >So is there a consensus on when 3.x-STABLE is going to be >retired? Current suggestions are that it will go to 3.6 or 3.7 before being retired. This will presumably depend on the rate at which 4.x stabilizes and people mo

Re: 4.0R ?

2000-03-14 Thread Anatoly Vorobey
On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 02:33:26PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote: > On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 07:05:46PM +, Ben Smithurst wrote: > > I saw the RELENG_4 tag in my cvsup log, but I don't think that's the > > same as the 4.0 release tag is it? > > You are right -- RELENG_4 is not the release tag. >

Re: 4.0R ?

2000-03-14 Thread Peter Jeremy
At 19:05 03/13/2000 +, Ben Smithurst wrote: >I saw the RELENG_4 tag in my cvsup log, but I don't think that's the >same as the 4.0 release tag is it? That would be RELENG_4_0_0_RELEASE >surely. That's correct. RELENG_4 is the 4.x-STABLE branch. At some point, Jordan will create a RELENG_4_0

Re: 4.0R ?

2000-03-14 Thread David O'Brien
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 07:05:46PM +, Ben Smithurst wrote: > I saw the RELENG_4 tag in my cvsup log, but I don't think that's the > same as the 4.0 release tag is it? You are right -- RELENG_4 is not the release tag. > That would be RELENG_4_0_0_RELEASE surely. Correct. -- -- David([

Re: 4.0R ?

2000-03-14 Thread David O'Brien
On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 08:20:40AM -0500, Tom Embt wrote: > I believe RELENG_4 would refer to the 4.x-STABLE branch (??maybe??) Yes. -- -- David([EMAIL PROTECTED]) To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: 4.0R ?

2000-03-14 Thread Tom Embt
At 19:05 03/13/2000 +, Ben Smithurst wrote: >Jim Bloom wrote: > >> The tag was laid down earlier today. Here is what my current kernel >> claims to be at the moment: > >I saw the RELENG_4 tag in my cvsup log, but I don't think that's the >same as the 4.0 release tag is it? That would be RELEN

Re: 4.0R ?

2000-03-13 Thread Ben Smithurst
Jim Bloom wrote: > The tag was laid down earlier today. Here is what my current kernel > claims to be at the moment: I saw the RELENG_4 tag in my cvsup log, but I don't think that's the same as the 4.0 release tag is it? That would be RELENG_4_0_0_RELEASE surely. -- Ben Smithurst / [EMAIL PRO

Re: 4.0R ?

2000-03-13 Thread Jim Bloom
The tag was laid down earlier today. Here is what my current kernel claims to be at the moment: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #31: Mon Mar 13 10:59:41 EST 2000 Actually, there might be a couple fixes slipped in between now and the release, but 4.0R exists. You may cvsup with the tag RELENG_4 now if you

4.0R ?

2000-03-13 Thread Mike Tancsa
I do follow current, but I must be blind if I missed it. What is the latest date for 4.0R ? Will there be instead another Release Candidate and more testing ? ---Mike Mike Tancsa