On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 13:14:08 +1000
Johny Mattsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure what the best approach would be, so I'd like some feedback
on this. Would it be acceptable to introduce another dummy target (like
FILESYSTEMS)? From a purely FreeBSD perspective I would probably find
Hi all,
I just upgraded a couple of my systems to 5.1-REL and have been
exploring the new stuff ever since.
First off, I'd like to extend a big thanks to the rcNG people - well
done, this is so much nicer/better/flexible than the old system! :)
Then on to the question: there appears to be a
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 12:16:53 +1000
Johny Mattsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a good reason why we don't have mountall? Are all avenues
really covered by the mountcrit scripts?
This stems from the fact that the way we handle filesystems is different from
the way NetBSD handles it.
Mike Makonnen wrote:
This stems from the fact that the way we handle filesystems is different from
the way NetBSD handles it. For our purposes, we need one pass to mount local
filesystems and a second one to mount remote ones.
Ah, okay. I haven't actually been root on a NetBSD box, so I'm not
