Re: ACL issue (Was Re: HEADS UP: ZFSv28 is in!)

2011-03-06 Thread Steve Wills
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/06/11 08:35, Steve Wills wrote: On 03/06/11 04:22, Edward Tomasz NapieraBa wrote: Wiadomo[ napisana przez Steve Wills w dniu 2011-03-06, o godz. 05:11: [..] Thanks for your work on this, I'm very happy to have ZFS v28. I just updated

Re: ACL issue (Was Re: HEADS UP: ZFSv28 is in!)

2011-03-06 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Sun, Mar 06, 2011 at 09:43:34AM -0500, Steve Wills wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/06/11 08:35, Steve Wills wrote: On 03/06/11 04:22, Edward Tomasz NapieraBa wrote: Wiadomo[ napisana przez Steve Wills w dniu 2011-03-06, o godz. 05:11: [..] Thanks

Re: ACL issue (Was Re: HEADS UP: ZFSv28 is in!)

2011-03-06 Thread Steve Wills
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/06/11 10:37, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: At first glance it looks like acl_set_fd_np(3) isn't working on an md-backed filesystem; specifically, it's returning EOPNOTSUPP. You should be able to reproduce the problem by doing a setfacl on

Re: ACL issue (Was Re: HEADS UP: ZFSv28 is in!)

2011-03-06 Thread Robert N. M. Watson
On 6 Mar 2011, at 16:30, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: 2. Are you absolutely 100% sure the kernel you're using was built with options UFS_ACL defined in it? Doing a strings -a /boot/kernel/kernel | grep UFS_ACL should suffice. Yep, it does: % strings -a /boot/kernel/kernel | grep

Re: ACL issue (Was Re: HEADS UP: ZFSv28 is in!)

2011-03-06 Thread Steve Wills
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/06/11 11:30, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Sun, Mar 06, 2011 at 08:23:42AM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Sun, Mar 06, 2011 at 11:06:09AM -0500, Steve Wills wrote: Sorry, I should have been more clear -- my investigation wasn't to determine

Re: ACL issue (Was Re: HEADS UP: ZFSv28 is in!)

2011-03-06 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Sun, Mar 06, 2011 at 11:06:09AM -0500, Steve Wills wrote: On 03/06/11 10:37, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: At first glance it looks like acl_set_fd_np(3) isn't working on an md-backed filesystem; specifically, it's returning EOPNOTSUPP. You should be able to reproduce the problem by doing a

Re: ACL issue (Was Re: HEADS UP: ZFSv28 is in!)

2011-03-06 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Sun, Mar 06, 2011 at 08:23:42AM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Sun, Mar 06, 2011 at 11:06:09AM -0500, Steve Wills wrote: On 03/06/11 10:37, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: At first glance it looks like acl_set_fd_np(3) isn't working on an md-backed filesystem; specifically, it's returning

Re: ACL issue (Was Re: HEADS UP: ZFSv28 is in!)

2011-03-06 Thread Edward Tomasz Napierała
Wiadomość napisana przez Steve Wills w dniu 2011-03-06, o godz. 15:43: On 03/06/11 08:35, Steve Wills wrote: On 03/06/11 04:22, Edward Tomasz NapieraBa wrote: Wiadomo[ napisana przez Steve Wills w dniu 2011-03-06, o godz. 05:11: [..] Thanks for your work on this, I'm very happy to have

Re: ACL issue (Was Re: HEADS UP: ZFSv28 is in!)

2011-03-06 Thread Steve Wills
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/06/11 12:49, Edward Tomasz Napierała wrote: The above looks like old-style, canonical six trivial ACL. Now, cp(1) shouldn't even try to copy the ACL in this case, since there is nothing to copy. So, for some reason, something failed

Re: ACL issue (Was Re: HEADS UP: ZFSv28 is in!)

2011-03-06 Thread Edward Tomasz Napierała
Wiadomość napisana przez Steve Wills w dniu 2011-03-06, o godz. 19:27: On 03/06/11 12:49, Edward Tomasz Napierała wrote: The above looks like old-style, canonical six trivial ACL. Now, cp(1) shouldn't even try to copy the ACL in this case, since there is nothing to copy. So, for some