Re: ACLS on UFS2 from FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE install.

2003-08-14 Thread Robert Watson
On Fri, 8 Aug 2003, Terry Lambert wrote: > "Daniel C. Sobral" wrote: > > You'll also notice I'm not questioning the _existence_ of ACL. My point > > is that FreeBSD is Unix (no matter what the lawyers say), and people > > don't usually think of ACL when they think of Unix. Ergo, enabling ACL > >

Re: ACLS on UFS2 from FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE install.

2003-08-14 Thread Daniel C. Sobral
Scott M. Likens wrote: Has anyone noticed the ACLS being disabled? tunefs -p /dev/da1s1c shows that ACLS are disabled on every partition I have, i've gone through them all. any reason why? ACL is not the standard unix permission. Why enable something most people don't even know is there? -- Dani

Re: ACLS on UFS2 from FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE install.

2003-08-14 Thread Daniel C. Sobral
Terry Lambert wrote: "Daniel C. Sobral" wrote: You'll also notice I'm not questioning the _existence_ of ACL. My point is that FreeBSD is Unix (no matter what the lawyers say), and people don't usually think of ACL when they think of Unix. Ergo, enabling ACL by defautl violates POLA. Not if you

Re: ACLS on UFS2 from FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE install.

2003-08-08 Thread Terry Lambert
"Daniel C. Sobral" wrote: > You'll also notice I'm not questioning the _existence_ of ACL. My point > is that FreeBSD is Unix (no matter what the lawyers say), and people > don't usually think of ACL when they think of Unix. Ergo, enabling ACL > by defautl violates POLA. Not if you never *set* an

Re: ACLS on UFS2 from FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE install.

2003-08-07 Thread Terry Lambert
"Daniel C. Sobral" wrote: > Scott M. Likens wrote: > > Has anyone noticed the ACLS being disabled? > > > > tunefs -p /dev/da1s1c shows that ACLS are disabled on every partition I > > have, i've gone through them all. > > > > any reason why? > > ACL is not the standard unix permission. Why enable s

Re: ACLS on UFS2 from FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE install.

2003-08-07 Thread Daniel C. Sobral
Terry Lambert wrote: "Daniel C. Sobral" wrote: Scott M. Likens wrote: Has anyone noticed the ACLS being disabled? tunefs -p /dev/da1s1c shows that ACLS are disabled on every partition I have, i've gone through them all. any reason why? ACL is not the standard unix permission. Why enable somethin

Re: ACLS on UFS2 from FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE install.

2003-08-05 Thread Robert Watson
On 2 Aug 2003, Scott M. Likens wrote: > Has anyone noticed the ACLS being disabled? > > tunefs -p /dev/da1s1c shows that ACLS are disabled on every partition I > have, i've gone through them all. > > any reason why? Yes -- they are disabled by default because they're not required by most us

ACLS on UFS2 from FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE install.

2003-08-02 Thread Scott M. Likens
Has anyone noticed the ACLS being disabled? tunefs -p /dev/da1s1c shows that ACLS are disabled on every partition I have, i've gone through them all. any reason why? tunefs: ACLs: (-a) disabled tunefs: MAC multilabel: (-l) d