On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 12:36 AM Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > APM BIOS support will likely be removed from FreeBSD for FreeBSD 13. This
> > was once quite important for LAPTOP users. However, it is now no longer
> > relevant. It stopped being supported around the t
Hi!
> APM BIOS support will likely be removed from FreeBSD for FreeBSD 13. This
> was once quite important for LAPTOP users. However, it is now no longer
> relevant. It stopped being supported around the time that ACPI started to
> be released for laptops. This was around the Pe
Greetings,
APM BIOS support will likely be removed from FreeBSD for FreeBSD 13. This
was once quite important for LAPTOP users. However, it is now no longer
relevant. It stopped being supported around the time that ACPI started to
be released for laptops. This was around the Pentium 200MHz laptop
On Sat, 22 Nov 2003, Ryan Sommers wrote:
> I'm having difficulty getting battery and thermal status. If I compile the
> kernel with APM support I get battery statistics but if I try to put
> APM/ACPI in the kernel ACPI reports that another PM system is enabled and
> doesn
I'm having difficulty getting battery and thermal status. If I compile the
kernel with APM support I get battery statistics but if I try to put
APM/ACPI in the kernel ACPI reports that another PM system is enabled and
doesn't load the /dev/acpi device. If I take APM out and compile
e an idea what this breakage might have caused ?
>
> About a week ago I got apm/acpi working with an unoff patch from this URL.
>
> http://sandcat.nl/~stijn/freebsd/dell.php
>
> I didn't changed anything in:
> /etc/rc.conf
> /boot/loader.conf
>
On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 11:28:19AM -0500, Ken Menzel wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
> I bet acpi isn't even running. As of a few days ago acpi is disabled
> as a loadable module due to some changes in progress. Try adding
> 'device acpi' to your kernel.conf file and rebuild/reinstall the
> kernel.
>
> Ken
m" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 11:07 AM
Subject: since 2 days apm / ACPI doesn't work and boot instabilities
> Hi,
>
> wanted to let you know, that since yesterday ACPI on my
> Dell Latitude D600 doesn't work anym
On Fri, 7 Nov 2003, Andreas Klemm wrote:
> wanted to let you know, that since yesterday ACPI on my
> Dell Latitude D600 doesn't work anymore.
/usr/src/UPDATING
20031103:
The i386 APIC_IO kernel option has been replaced by
'device apic'. The ACPI module has also been temporarily
Hi,
wanted to let you know, that since yesterday ACPI on my
Dell Latitude D600 doesn't work anymore.
Does anybody have an idea what this breakage might have caused ?
About a week ago I got apm/acpi working with an unoff patch from this URL.
http://sandcat.nl/~stijn/freebsd/dell.p
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 06:37:26PM +0100, Andreas Klemm wrote:
> Cc'd to Stijn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
> Many thanks Stijn, for making that patch available!
No problem, but I'd like it if you also thank Mark Santcroos for making
that patch in the first place -- I'm just the messenger here...
> So no
Is there somebody interested to get ssh access on my new
DELL Laptop to find out why apm doesn't work ?
For example an /dev/apm device isn't created by devfs ...
I make this offer for 2 purposes:
a) to make it happen on my laptop of course ;-)
b) so that 5.2 will really become a gre
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 05:02:24PM +0100, Thorsten Greiner wrote:
> * Andreas Klemm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-11-03 17:00]:
> > Is there somebody interested to get ssh access on my new
> > DELL Laptop to find out why apm doesn't work ?
>
> Did you
>
> -
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 05:02:24PM +0100, Thorsten Greiner wrote:
> * Andreas Klemm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-11-03 17:00]:
> > Is there somebody interested to get ssh access on my new
> > DELL Laptop to find out why apm doesn't work ?
>
> Did you
>
> -
If
hint.apm.0.disabled="1"
in your
/boot/device.hints, try removing it.
Thanks
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
* Andreas Klemm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-11-03 17:00]:
> Is there somebody interested to get ssh access on my new
> DELL Laptop to find out why apm doesn't work ?
Did you
- upgrade to the latest BIOS provided by DELL
- apply the DSDT patch available from
http://
this mail from me didn't arrive on -current, so here again
On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 06:37:20PM +0100, Andreas Klemm wrote:
> Is there somebody interested to get ssh access on my new
> DELL Laptop to find out why apm doesn't work ?
>
> For example an /dev/apm device
> Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2003 23:37:15 -0700
> From: Peter Wemm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> "Kevin Oberman" wrote:
> > > Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2003 22:01:07 -0700
> > > From: Peter Wemm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
"Kevin Oberman" wrote:
> > Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2003 22:01:07 -0700
> > From: Peter Wemm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > I've made a commit that has been reported as breaking APM for some people.
> > I'll be
"Kevin Oberman" wrote:
> > Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2003 22:01:07 -0700
> > From: Peter Wemm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > I've made a commit that has been reported as breaking APM for some people.
> > I'll be
> Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2003 22:01:07 -0700
> From: Peter Wemm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I've made a commit that has been reported as breaking APM for some people.
> I'll be following this up, so could folks please report here if things
>
I've made a commit that has been reported as breaking APM for some people.
I'll be following this up, so could folks please report here if things
break? (and feel free to say so if you find the problem :-). It would
also be interesting to know that things are ok for a few people too.
(Compaq Armada E500).
> > I have a problem with the power management :
> >
> > - I can't use the ACPI module : the kernel can't be loaded.
> > OK no problem !
> > As I saw within many FAQs, it's normal (it depends on the type of the lapto
use the ACPI module : the kernel can't be loaded.
> OK no problem !
> As I saw within many FAQs, it's normal (it depends on the type of the laptop).
>
> - I would like to use APM so !
> I realize the following stages (see
> http://freebsd.unixtech.be/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/ar
Hi,
I have installed a FreeBSD 5.1 on my Laptop (Compaq Armada E500).
I have a problem with the power management :
- I can't use the ACPI module : the kernel can't be loaded.
OK no problem !
As I saw within many FAQs, it's normal (it depends on the type of the laptop).
- I would
Mark Santcroos wrote this message on Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 13:05 +0200:
> Can someone running current & apm mail me the output of "sysctl -a".
This isn't -current, but it is 5.1-R. If you have some stuff to improve
apm, I'd be interested in it since I can
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 01:48:18PM +0200, Lukas Ertl wrote:
> No problem. May I ask what you need it for?
Nate asked me to rewrite "zzz" to support both APM and ACPI.
I wanted to make sure that the environment of current + APM looks like I
think it does by looking at the code.
M
On Fri, 11 Jul 2003, Mark Santcroos wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 01:05:30PM +0200, Mark Santcroos wrote:
> > Can someone running current & apm mail me the output of "sysctl -a".
>
> I'm set.
>
> Thanks Lukas!
No problem. May I ask what you n
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 01:05:30PM +0200, Mark Santcroos wrote:
> Can someone running current & apm mail me the output of "sysctl -a".
I'm set.
Thanks Lukas!
--
Mark SantcroosRIPE Network Coordination Centre
http://www.ripe.net/home/mark/
Can someone running current & apm mail me the output of "sysctl -a".
Thanks
--
Mark SantcroosRIPE Network Coordination Centre
http://www.ripe.net/home/mark/New Projects Group/TTM
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mai
Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jesse Guardiani
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 11:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: APM problem in 5.1-RELEASE
Jesse Guardiani wrote:
> Things I would like to improve upon:
> --
Jesse Guardiani wrote:
> Things I would like to improve upon:
>
> 1.) I need to find some way to automatically kill any processes that are
> using (or have opened) the /dev/acd0 device BEFORE executing apm -z
> from /etc/rc.suspend.
OK
y CD-ROM to not crash my system on
>>> resume I'll be a VERY happy man...
I did some more testing on this last night, and it appears that
the atacontrol detach method _does_ work, but only in specialized
circumstances.
I have modified my /etc/rc.suspend to call 'atacontrol detac
Jesse Guardiani wrote:
> Jesse Guardiani wrote:
>
>> Darryl Okahata wrote:
>>
>>> Jesse Guardiani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> Now, if I can just get that lousy CD-ROM to not crash my system on
>> resume I'll be a VERY happy man...
>
>
> Well, I'm getting a bit closer now.
>
>
Jesse Guardiani wrote:
> Darryl Okahata wrote:
>
>> Jesse Guardiani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> Now, if I can just get that lousy CD-ROM to not crash my system on
> resume I'll be a VERY happy man...
Well, I'm getting a bit closer now.
I rebooted and reinstalled the CD drive, then I e
Darryl Okahata wrote:
> Jesse Guardiani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> 1.) When in X Windows (this never happened in Linux. What gives?)
>
> Another WAG: have you tried this kernel option?:
>
> options SC_NO_SUSPEND_VTYSWITCH
>
> It prevented X11 from crashing my A31 (but didn't he
Jesse Guardiani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1.) When in X Windows (this never happened in Linux. What gives?)
Another WAG: have you tried this kernel option?:
options SC_NO_SUSPEND_VTYSWITCH
It prevented X11 from crashing my A31 (but didn't help with the display
corruption).
--
Darryl Okahata wrote:
> Jesse Guardiani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
>Is there any way to disable the ata1-slave? BIOS?
I looked. No BIOS config options for ATA devices whatsoever.
This is probably because I'm using an IBM Thinkpad with
an Ultrabay 2000 (containing a floppy drive current
g fair.
>>
>> Jesse was providing useful information, and drew logical conclusions
>> from it.
>
> ok. i hereby apologize to Jesse. i didn't mean to sound too harsh.
Don't sweat it. I understand. I like FreeBSD too.
However, I'd like to note here that I HAVE tri
On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 08:23:09PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> On (2003/06/19 20:06), Tobias Roth wrote:
>
> > you compare a stable linux kernel branch with an unstable freebsd branch.
> > please make yourself familiar with freebsds (and possibly linux') release
> > process before you make state
On (2003/06/19 20:06), Tobias Roth wrote:
> you compare a stable linux kernel branch with an unstable freebsd branch.
> please make yourself familiar with freebsds (and possibly linux') release
> process before you make statements like this. you will only piss off the
> people that are trying to h
On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 01:48:18PM -0400, Jesse Guardiani wrote:
>
> First off, I'd like to note, once again, that APM works PERFECTLY under
> Linux on this laptop with a 2.4.18 and 2.4.20 kernel. I could even suspend
> and resume from X Windows without problems. FreeBSD's
Jesse Guardiani wrote:
> Darryl Okahata wrote:
>
>> Jesse Guardiani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Help! This APM BIOS suspends fine under Linux (2.4.18
>>> kernel)! I've tried everything I can think of to
>>> get suspend working und
Darryl Okahata wrote:
> Jesse Guardiani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Help! This APM BIOS suspends fine under Linux (2.4.18
>> kernel)! I've tried everything I can think of to
>> get suspend working under 5.1-RELEASE!
>
> Wild-a** guess:
>
One thing that jumps out at me on my T30 is that when I issue the S3,
the disk spins down instantly. Under APM it takes several seconds and
under Windows XP it also pauses bor a few (maybe 4) seconds.
I suspect it is powering down the disk as soon as the S3 is issued and
the write cache is never
Jesse Guardiani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Help! This APM BIOS suspends fine under Linux (2.4.18
> kernel)! I've tried everything I can think of to
> get suspend working under 5.1-RELEASE!
Wild-a** guess:
> ata1-slave: timeout waiting for interrupt
> ata1-sl
io_range=1
To get the kernel booting.
I have apm enabled and loading properly in the
kernel (as a module), and I have apmd running
and apm enabled in user space.
Problem:
I can place the system into Standby mode and
bring it back without problems, but when I try
to suspend the system,
Quoting myself <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> How should I proceed to make my laptop sleep ? :)
acpiconf -s n (where n is number between 1 and 5)
Questions are so nice when you can answer 'em by yourself ;P
--
Pierrick Brossin
IT Swiss - QUARK Media House
6a Puits Godet, 2000 Neuchatel, Switzerland
Ma
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 08:55:03AM +0100, Pierrick Brossin wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I saw many stuff about acpi in dmesg since I changed to 5.0
> So I assume it's newer than APM.
>
> # man zzz
>
> --
> APM(8) FreeBSD System Manager's Manual
Hi!
I saw many stuff about acpi in dmesg since I changed to 5.0
So I assume it's newer than APM.
# man zzz
--
APM(8) FreeBSD System Manager's Manual APM(8)
NAME
apm, zzz - control the APM BIOS and display its information
[..]
--
How do I make
"Cliff L. Biffle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I sort of expected ACPI to fail after watching everyone else, but the killer
> here is that APM doesn't seem to work either once ACPI is disabled. Its
> error messages are less interesting. When compiled into the
pi0 attach returned 6
I sort of expected ACPI to fail after watching everyone else, but the killer
here is that APM doesn't seem to work either once ACPI is disabled. Its
error messages are less interesting. When compiled into the kernel, there
are no error messages, but the /dev/apm device
I have acpi disabled and apm enabled in /boot/device.hints
because acpi didn't do standby properly: apm -Z wouldn't turn off the
screen backlight, and on reawakening the screen would be messed up.
(acpiconf -s {2,3} didn't work either.) With acpi, the following
problem doesn&#x
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Sean LeBlanc wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I'm trying to figure out how to get apm to run on 5.0 RC1. I have a Thinkpad
>390x; apm worked on 4.7.
>
>If I run apmd -d, I get:
>apmd[776]: start
>apmd: cannot open device file `/dev/apmctl&#
Hello,
I'm trying to figure out how to get apm to run on 5.0 RC1. I have a Thinkpad
390x; apm worked on 4.7.
If I run apmd -d, I get:
apmd[776]: start
apmd: cannot open device file `/dev/apmctl': No such file or directory
Okay, I think. I look for /dev/MAKEDEV, it's missing. Afte
Stupid question perhaps, but was the inclusion of and
twice in "/usr/src/usr.sbin/apm/apm.c" done intentionally?
Thanks
Andrew Lankford
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
g when the lid is closed? or would adding device apm to the
> > kernel and then enabling apmd and apm in rc.conf cause it to read the
> > settings in the BIOS which I used the ThinkPad PS2 utility to configure
> > instead? When I attempt to do a make buildworld, after about 5 m
[subject was changed]
Hi,
> WinXP, it was running under ACPI. However, with the GENERIC kernel, the
> fan doesn't seem to go on. Is there a way to disable the system from
> suspending when the lid is closed? or would adding device apm to the
> kernel and then enabling apmd a
Battery status: unknown
> > > > > > Remaining battery time: 0:00:00
>
> These were all zero because you were plugged in, as you showed the values
> were showed when you were unplugged.
>
> > > > > > APM Capabilities:
> > > &g
;>>>>Remaining battery time: 0:00:00
>>>>>
>
> These were all zero because you were plugged in, as you showed the values
> were showed when you were unplugged.
>
>
>>>>>>APM Capabilities:
>>>>>>unkn
aining battery time: 0:00:00
These were all zero because you were plugged in, as you showed the values
were showed when you were unplugged.
> > > > > APM Capabilities:
> > > > > unknown
This is explained by the fact that you run ACPI. Afaik it's either
On Mon, 9 Sep 2002 10:56:07 +0200
Mark Santcroos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Battery status: unknown
> > > > Remaining battery time: unknown
> > > > Battery 0:
> > > > Battery status: unknown
> > > >
> > > Battery status: unknown
> > > Remaining battery time: unknown
> > > Battery 0:
> > > Battery status: unknown
> > > Remaining battery time: 0:00:00
> > > APM Capabilities:
> > > unknown
What does: '
Mark Santcroos wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 07, 2002 at 07:29:10PM +0200, John Angelmo wrote:
> > I'm trying to get some apm support on my laptop.
> > I have device apm in my kernelconf
> > and apm_enable="YES" in rc.conf
> >
> > but when I run apm I get:
On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Gavin Atkinson wrote:
> Since the recent ACPI import (i believe), it seems that ACPI is no longer
> disabled when APM is enabled. I do not explicitely disable API anywhere.
> In the past, I have seen upon bootup a message "apm: Other PM system
> enabled
>The new apci & pci-pci code works wonderfully. However, I've got a
> problem with the fxp driver not reenabling the device correctly upon a
> resume from suspend. Details below - Note even when I try to put the
> laptop into suspend mode S2 which it doesn't support the problem
> occurs, the
Hi All,
The new apci & pci-pci code works wonderfully. However, I've got a
problem with the fxp driver not reenabling the device correctly upon a
resume from suspend. Details below - Note even when I try to put the
laptop into suspend mode S2 which it doesn't support the problem occurs,
th
Hi,
Since the recent ACPI import (i believe), it seems that ACPI is no longer
disabled when APM is enabled. I do not explicitely disable API anywhere,
I have the following configuration:
device.hints:
hint.apm.0.at="nexus"
hint.apm.0.flags="0x20"
kernel config file:
device
I am running CURRENT and is experienceing something odd with apm. If I turn
it off in the kernel, the battery behaves as I would expect it (basically
it provides power wihle unplugged :) ), but then the sleep function doesn't
work - obviously. Howevever, if I turn on apm support the
According to Gavin Atkinson:
> My laptop powered off due to a flat battery, and upon powerup, i
> immediately experienced a panic.
>
> ata0: resetting devices .. done
> panic: ata_dmasetup: transfer active on this device!
It does happen sometimes on my Z600TEL Vaio too.
--
Ollivier ROBERT -=- F
01eaf53 in bus_generic_resume (dev=0x0) at device_if.h:75
#25 0xc01eaf53 in bus_generic_resume (dev=0x0) at device_if.h:75
#26 0xc01eaf53 in bus_generic_resume (dev=0x0) at device_if.h:75
#27 0xc02e1983 in apm_resume () at device_if.h:75
#28 0xc02e21ef in apm_processevent () at /usr/src/sys/i386/apm
w how goes it.
Cheers,
Mike Makonnen.
Index: etc/rc.d/apm
=======
RCS file: etc/rc.d/apm
diff -N etc/rc.d/apm
--- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -
+++ etc/rc.d/apm24 Jun 2002 19:53:06 -
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+#
+# $Free
On Fri, 21 Jun 2002 18:53:11 +0200
Ronald Klop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> In the rc_ng is 'apm -e enable' not run if I have apm_enable="YES"
> and/or apmd_enable="YES" in my rc.conf. But apmd is run with the last
> option.
Hello,
In the rc_ng is 'apm -e enable' not run if I have apm_enable="YES"
and/or apmd_enable="YES" in my rc.conf. But apmd is run with the last
option.
Greetings,
Ronald.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 11:11:45PM +0100, Wilko Bulte wrote:
Never mind.. this was due to the fact that device.hints had APM
disabled.
Looks a lot better now:
APM version: 1.2
APM Managment: Enabled
AC Line status: on-line
Battery status: charging
Remaining battery life: 62%
Remaining battery
Hi
I just went -current with my Compaq Armada E700 laptop.
Coming from -stable.
I'm a bit puzzled by:
WKB ~: apm
APM version: 1.2
APM Managment: Enabled
AC Line status: off-line
Battery status: charging
Remaining battery life: invalid value (0x)
Remaining battery time: unknown
N
Project
[EMAIL PROTECTED] NAI Labs, Safeport Network Services
On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> In the not to distant past (3 months?) My -current laptop kernel (with apm
> in it I believe,(it's not here)) would repond to a "halt -p" by switching
> o
In the not to distant past (3 months?) My -current laptop kernel (with apm
in it I believe,(it's not here)) would repond to a "halt -p" by switching
off the power.
Since January, this has stopped working. (I now have to wait around until
I see the message and hit the power butto
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mike Smith writes:
: > : APM and ACPI are mutually exclusive from what I understand. You should
: > : remove the apm device from your kernel config.
: >
: > I've been able to run both with my VAIO. However, my VAIO hangs
: > randomly wi
> : APM and ACPI are mutually exclusive from what I understand. You should
> : remove the apm device from your kernel config.
>
> I've been able to run both with my VAIO. However, my VAIO hangs
> randomly with ACPI enabled (even when i have apm disable).
You shouldn
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mitsuru IWASAKI writes:
: Generalized power-management interface API to have compatibility with
: APM and ACPI also is suggested long time ago;
:
:http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=403390+406841+/usr/local/www/db/text/2001/freebsd-current/20010114.f
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Scott Long writes:
: On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 10:50:17AM +0200, Georg-W. Koltermann wrote:
: > Hi,
: >
: > I'm wondering how I should handle APM now that ACPI has basically
: > taken over power management responsibility.
:
: APM and ACPI are
At Mon, 1 Oct 2001 08:49:10 -0600,
Scott Long wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 10:50:17AM +0200, Georg-W. Koltermann wrote:
> [...]
> > I also was able to suspend and resume my machine (DELL Inspiron 7500)
> > with APM being configured (and ACPI being active by default
Hi,
> On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 10:50:17AM +0200, Georg-W. Koltermann wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm wondering how I should handle APM now that ACPI has basically
> > taken over power management responsibility.
>
> APM and ACPI are mutually exclusive from what
It seems Scott Long wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 10:50:17AM +0200, Georg-W. Koltermann wrote:
> > I also was able to suspend and resume my machine (DELL Inspiron 7500)
> > with APM being configured (and ACPI being active by default). Sound
> > is dead after a resume,
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 10:50:17AM +0200, Georg-W. Koltermann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm wondering how I should handle APM now that ACPI has basically
> taken over power management responsibility.
APM and ACPI are mutually exclusive from what I understand. You should
remove the apm
Hi,
I'm wondering how I should handle APM now that ACPI has basically
taken over power management responsibility.
It seems I still need to configure APM so that /dev/apm is there and
battery monitoring utilities like the GNOME battery_applet can work.
I also was able to suspend and resu
All:
On one of my machines at work I run current and had been without "audio"
until
I found a posting where a user noted that enabling "APM" in the kernel
broke audio
Heh... I disabled apm/pmtimer and my PCM device works great While I
don't really care
about APM
Under 4.3, apm works ... after a fashion on my Fujitsu lifebook.
Suspend and resume work and the battery status is available. I also
find that the non-cardbus pccards work, after a fashion.
There are interactions, though. One particularly gnawing one is that
pccards cease to work after a
Hello,
I have a some problem of APM with 5.0-current.
In the case which I type
# shutdown -p now
the system does halt or reboot( this seems to be somewhat unstable),
and never off the power of the PC.
To find the problem, I produced the crash dump and analyzed it by gdb.
The result was
According to Warner Losh:
> to your config file. Fixes it for me. Tell people on #bsdcode about
> this.
Darn, I thought I remembered this one, sorry for being stupid. Works now.
/me blames it on the flu
--
Ollivier ROBERT -=- Eurocontrol EEC/ITM -=- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD caerdonn.eurocont
Hi
I have a Compaq Armada E500 and the apm support doesnt work. It seems that
the kernel doesnt find the apm controller just that it is on the pci bus. I
am using freebsd 5.0-20001112-current and have tried with both the generic
kernel and my custom kernel. in the kernel configuration I have
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Warner Losh writes:
: Add
: device pmtimer
: to your config file. Fixes it for me. Tell people on #bsdcode about
: this.
I've gone ahead and updated GENERIC with this fix.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current"
Ollivier Robert wrote:
> Am I the only to have problem with the clock on a laptop using APM in
> CURRENT? Speaking with some people on #bsdcode apparently no.
>
> In short, the clock stops during suspend time...
>
> This is on a VAIO Z505SX running current from Nov, 8th.
>
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Ollivier Robert writes:
: Am I the only to have problem with the clock on a laptop using APM in
: CURRENT? Speaking with some people on #bsdcode apparently no.
:
: In short, the clock stops during suspend time...
:
: This is on a VAIO Z505SX running curren
Am I the only to have problem with the clock on a laptop using APM in
CURRENT? Speaking with some people on #bsdcode apparently no.
In short, the clock stops during suspend time...
This is on a VAIO Z505SX running current from Nov, 8th.
Any idea when this will be fixed?
--
Ollivier ROBERT
Hi,
I wish to merge UNIX domain socket feature to pccardd from PAO. This
makes pccard related PAO3/ports such as gxcardmon work. This means
you can control your pccard from GUI based application.
It requires introducing inactive state to cardstate in the kernel.
This state is "the card stays in
Hi,
I added output of per battery information to apm(1). To obtain this
information safely, I propose new ioctl APMIO_GETPWSTATUS.
http://www.imasy.or.jp/~ume/FreeBSD/apm-pwstatus.diff
If there is no objection, I'll commit this next week end.
Thanks,
--
Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet M
Hi,
I worked apm debug print cleanup to avoid re-build kernel with
APM_DEUG (this kernel option seems unavailable for now) for obtaining
debug messages on apm.
http://people.freebsd.org/~iwasaki/apm/apm-debug.diff
The debug flag can be controlled by sysctl interface and loader
setting
Cyrille Lefevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> why it's not possible to suspend SCSI drives like the ATA/IDE ones ?
>
> I'm not talking about camcontrol suspend feature. if you have a mounted
> filesystem, and access a file onto that filesystem while the drive is
> suspended in this manner, the s
1 - 100 of 226 matches
Mail list logo
