Hi Kostic and Jaakko,
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 06:45:22PM +0300, Jaakko Heinonen wrote:
On 2011-08-03, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 02:44:23PM +0900, Kohji Okuno wrote:
devfs_populate(), and the context holds only dm-dm_lock in
devfs_populate().
On the other
On 2011-08-03, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 02:44:23PM +0900, Kohji Okuno wrote:
devfs_populate(), and the context holds only dm-dm_lock in
devfs_populate().
On the other hand, devfs_generation is incremented in devfs_create()
and devfs_destroy() the context
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 06:45:22PM +0300, Jaakko Heinonen wrote:
On 2011-08-03, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 02:44:23PM +0900, Kohji Okuno wrote:
devfs_populate(), and the context holds only dm-dm_lock in
devfs_populate().
On the other hand, devfs_generation
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 11:41:39AM +0900, Kohji Okuno wrote:
Hello Kostik,
From: Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Bug: devfs is sure to have the bug.
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 16:50:44 +0300
I think the problem you described is real, and suggested change is right.
Initially
Hello Kostik,
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 11:41:39AM +0900, Kohji Okuno wrote:
Hello Kostik,
From: Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Bug: devfs is sure to have the bug.
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 16:50:44 +0300
I think the problem you described is real, and suggested change
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 06:56:00PM +0900, Kohji Okuno wrote:
Hello Kostik,
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 11:41:39AM +0900, Kohji Okuno wrote:
But, now I'm using 8.1-RELEASE. May I have advice about 8.X ?
Do you mean a patch for the stable/8 ? I believe it is enough to
apply rev. 211628 to
Hello Kostik,
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 11:41:39AM +0900, Kohji Okuno wrote:
But, now I'm using 8.1-RELEASE. May I have advice about 8.X ?
Do you mean a patch for the stable/8 ? I believe it is enough to
apply rev. 211628 to stable/8, then the patch I posted yesterday
should be
On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 02:44:23PM +0900, Kohji Okuno wrote:
Hello,
Hello,
I think that devfs is sure to have the bug.
I found that I couldn't open /dev/XXX though the kernel detected XXX
device.
dm-dm_generation is updated with devfs_generation in
devfs_populate
Hello Kostik,
From: Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Bug: devfs is sure to have the bug.
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 16:50:44 +0300
Message-ID: 20110803135044.gm17...@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua
On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 02:44:23PM +0900, Kohji Okuno wrote:
Hello,
Hello,
I think
Hello,
I think that devfs is sure to have the bug.
I found that I couldn't open /dev/XXX though the kernel detected XXX
device.
dm-dm_generation is updated with devfs_generation in
devfs_populate(), and the context holds only dm-dm_lock in
devfs_populate().
On the other hand, devfs_generation
Hello,
Hello,
I think that devfs is sure to have the bug.
I found that I couldn't open /dev/XXX though the kernel detected XXX
device.
dm-dm_generation is updated with devfs_generation in
devfs_populate(), and the context holds only dm-dm_lock in
devfs_populate().
On the other
11 matches
Mail list logo