From: Yasuhiro Kimura
Subject: Re: Buildworld fails with external GCC toolchain
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 08:26:00 +0900 (JST)
>> I have amd64 world + kernel building with GCC 9 and the only remaining
>> open review not merged yet is https://reviews.freebsd.org/D34147.
>>
>&g
From: John Baldwin
Subject: Re: Buildworld fails with external GCC toolchain
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:46:29 -0800
>>> Not really, the gcc 9 build has been broken for months, as far as I
>>> know.
>>>
>>> See also: https://ci.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD-main-amd6
On 2/12/22 11:34 AM, Yasuhiro Kimura wrote:
From: Dimitry Andric
Subject: Re: Buildworld fails with external GCC toolchain
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2022 22:53:44 +0100
Not really, the gcc 9 build has been broken for months, as far as I know.
See also: https://ci.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD-main-amd64
From: Dimitry Andric
Subject: Re: Buildworld fails with external GCC toolchain
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2022 22:53:44 +0100
> Not really, the gcc 9 build has been broken for months, as far as I know.
>
> See also: https://ci.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD-main-amd64-gcc9_build/
>
> The last
On 11 Feb 2022, at 21:07, Yasuhiro Kimura wrote:
>
> I'm tring to update devel/binutils port to 2.38. When it was updated
> to 2.37.1, there was a suggestion that it should also be checked if
> building base system with GCC succeeds as binutils is a part of
> external GCC toolchain. So I'd like t
Hello,
I'm tring to update devel/binutils port to 2.38. When it was updated
to 2.37.1, there was a suggestion that it should also be checked if
building base system with GCC succeeds as binutils is a part of
external GCC toolchain. So I'd like to do it with binutils 2.38 before
updating the port.
