On Sat Sep 11 10, Gordon Tetlow wrote:
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 7:41 PM, Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org wrote:
Feedback on the man(1), manpath(1), apropos(1), and man.conf(5) manpages
would be appreciated. I'm new to manpage authoring and could use a
review.
you forgot the AUTHORS
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 8:17 PM, Anonymous swel...@gmail.com wrote:
Gordon Tetlow gor...@tetlows.org writes:
2. Imports configuration from /usr/local/etc/man.d/*.conf and
/etc/man.conf
(purposefully changed the manpath.config file since it is a different
syntax).
Hmm, and if LOCALBASE
Am 11.09.2010 um 09:35 schrieb Gordon Tetlow:
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 8:17 PM, Anonymous swel...@gmail.com wrote:
Gordon Tetlow gor...@tetlows.org writes:
2. Imports configuration from /usr/local/etc/man.d/*.conf and
/etc/man.conf
(purposefully changed the manpath.config file since it is
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Anonymous swel...@gmail.com wrote:
The order is still bogus compared to gnu man. If I don't like our
ancient GNU tools and altered PATH in order to prefer ones from ports
then I certainly don't want to view old manpages, too. The base manpath
should be
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 7:41 PM, Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org wrote:
Feedback on the man(1), manpath(1), apropos(1), and man.conf(5) manpages
would be appreciated. I'm new to manpage authoring and could use a
review.
you forgot the AUTHORS section in all of the man pages. ;) it's
Stefan Bethke s...@lassitu.de writes:
Am 11.09.2010 um 09:35 schrieb Gordon Tetlow:
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 8:17 PM, Anonymous swel...@gmail.com wrote:
Gordon Tetlow gor...@tetlows.org writes:
2. Imports configuration from /usr/local/etc/man.d/*.conf and
/etc/man.conf
(purposefully
Anonymous swel...@gmail.com writes:
PATH_MAN_SUB bin/../man
PATH_MAN_SUB bin/../.man # e.g. for ~/.bin + ~/.man
PATH_MAN_SUB /usr/bin/../share/man
Oops, that would be non-trivial substitution. It's more like
PATH_MAN_ADD bin ../man
PATH_MAN_ADD .bin ../.man
PATH_MAN_ADD /usr/bin
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 12:11 AM, Gordon Tetlow gor...@tetlows.org wrote:
All,
I sat down and rewrote the man tools from a relatively old codebase to a
single shell script. My original motivation was to allow multiple
configuration files so port installations did not have to mess with
Gordon Tetlow gor...@freebsd.org writes:
Gordon Tetlow gor...@freebsd.org writes:
Anonymous swel...@gmail.com writes:
It doesn't search in bin/../man nor in bin/.man. For example,
my PATH contains $LOCALBASE/bin:$HOME/.bin, while /etc/
manpath.config
is default one and contains
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 11:48:37PM +0400, Anonymous wrote:
Gordon Tetlow gor...@freebsd.org writes:
Gordon Tetlow gor...@freebsd.org writes:
Anonymous swel...@gmail.com writes:
It doesn't search in bin/../man nor in bin/.man. For example,
my PATH contains $LOCALBASE/bin:$HOME/.bin, while
On Thu Sep 9 10, Gordon Tetlow wrote:
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 12:11 AM, Gordon Tetlow gor...@tetlows.org wrote:
All,
I sat down and rewrote the man tools from a relatively old codebase to a
single shell script. My original motivation was to allow multiple
configuration files so port
On Thu Sep 9 10, Gordon Tetlow wrote:
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 12:11 AM, Gordon Tetlow gor...@tetlows.org wrote:
All,
I sat down and rewrote the man tools from a relatively old codebase to a
single shell script. My original motivation was to allow multiple
configuration files so port
Gordon Tetlow gor...@tetlows.org writes:
2. Imports configuration from /usr/local/etc/man.d/*.conf and /etc/man.conf
(purposefully changed the manpath.config file since it is a different
syntax).
Hmm, and if LOCALBASE != /usr/local? hier(7) does not specify /usr/local
as the only place
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Anonymous swel...@gmail.com wrote:
Gordon Tetlow gor...@tetlows.org writes:
It doesn't search in bin/../man nor in bin/.man. For example,
my PATH contains $LOCALBASE/bin:$HOME/.bin, while /etc/manpath.config
is default one and contains /usr/local/man which
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 11:52 PM, Gordon Tetlow gor...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Anonymous swel...@gmail.com wrote:
Gordon Tetlow gor...@tetlows.org writes:
It doesn't search in bin/../man nor in bin/.man. For example,
my PATH contains $LOCALBASE/bin:$HOME/.bin,
On Wed Aug 18 10, Alexander Best wrote:
On Wed Aug 18 10, Gordon Tetlow wrote:
All,
I sat down and rewrote the man tools from a relatively old codebase to a
single shell script. My original motivation was to allow multiple
configuration files so port installations did not have to mess
All,
I sat down and rewrote the man tools from a relatively old codebase to a
single shell script. My original motivation was to allow multiple
configuration files so port installations did not have to mess with
/etc/manpath.config (like perl for example) when needing to manipulate the
manpath.
On Wed Aug 18 10, Gordon Tetlow wrote:
All,
I sat down and rewrote the man tools from a relatively old codebase to a
single shell script. My original motivation was to allow multiple
configuration files so port installations did not have to mess with
/etc/manpath.config (like perl for
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 12:11 AM, Gordon Tetlow gor...@tetlows.org wrote:
All,
I sat down and rewrote the man tools from a relatively old codebase to a
single shell script. My original motivation was to allow multiple
configuration files so port installations did not have to mess with
Gordon Tetlow gor...@tetlows.org writes:
I've tried to make this mirror the functionality, directory search order,
and arguments as the current base implementation.
This brings me to my next point. I need some testers willing to try this
out. It would be particularly great if I could get
Anonymous swel...@gmail.com writes:
Gordon Tetlow gor...@tetlows.org writes:
I've tried to make this mirror the functionality, directory search order,
and arguments as the current base implementation.
This brings me to my next point. I need some testers willing to try this
out. It would be
Gordon Tetlow gor...@freebsd.org wrote
in aanlktikw3j5hbrz0gjpbab=8urfnkgjm069i8ennx...@mail.gmail.com:
go On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 12:11 AM, Gordon Tetlow gor...@tetlows.org wrote:
go
go All,
go
go I sat down and rewrote the man tools from a relatively old codebase to a
go single shell
22 matches
Mail list logo
