Comments on this patch?

2000-01-27 Thread Warner Losh
I've been running this for a while. I reversed the normal order to make it easier to do the math w/o having to shift columns and flip things over. BTW, I'm getting numbers that are 2x bigger than before :-(.I had makebuildworld down to around 1:20 at one point, but now it is 2:40.

Re: Comments on this patch?

2000-01-27 Thread David O'Brien
BTW, I'm getting numbers that are 2x bigger than before :-(.I had makebuildworld down to around 1:20 at one point, but now it is 2:40. Which compilers for both times? To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: Comments on this patch?

2000-01-27 Thread Peter Jeremy
On 2000-Jan-28 10:02:06 +1100, Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] "David O'Brien" writes: : BTW, I'm getting numbers that are 2x bigger than before :-(.I had : makebuildworld down to around 1:20 at one point, but now it is 2:40. ... So I'd say this is with

Re: Comments on this patch?

2000-01-27 Thread Will Andrews
On Thu, Jan 27, 2000 at 02:44:27PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: I've been running this for a while. I reversed the normal order to make it easier to do the math w/o having to shift columns and flip things over. Thanks for the patch! It'd be nice to time the buildworld only. Is there a timed

Re: Comments on this patch?

2000-01-27 Thread Matthew Dillon
:On Thu, Jan 27, 2000 at 02:44:27PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: : I've been running this for a while. I reversed the normal order to : make it easier to do the math w/o having to shift columns and flip : things over. : :Thanks for the patch! It'd be nice to time the buildworld only. Is there :a

Re: Comments on this patch?

2000-01-27 Thread David O'Brien
On Thu, Jan 27, 2000 at 04:00:40PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: So I'd say this is with 2.7.3 and the compiler in today's current. Ah. 2.95.2 is a known speed snail. The GCC developers took this to heart and 2.96 will compile much faster. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with

Re: Comments on this patch?

2000-01-27 Thread Bruce Evans
On Fri, 28 Jan 2000, Peter Jeremy wrote: On 2000-Jan-28 10:02:06 +1100, Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] "David O'Brien" writes: : BTW, I'm getting numbers that are 2x bigger than before :-(.I had : makebuildworld down to around 1:20 at one point, but

Re: Comments on this patch?

2000-01-27 Thread Bruce Evans
On Thu, 27 Jan 2000, Warner Losh wrote: I've been running this for a while. I reversed the normal order to make it easier to do the math w/o having to shift columns and flip things over. I plan to put timestamps on most of the "" lines and remove all the ornation around the "" lines.

Re: Comments on this patch?

2000-01-27 Thread Warner Losh
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bruce Evans writes: : I plan to put timestamps on most of the "" lines and remove all : the ornation around the "" lines. Almost every large target could : begin by (optionally of course) printing the time. Sounds more general than mine... Warner To Unsubscribe:

Re: Comments on this patch?

2000-01-27 Thread Rodney W. Grimes
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] "David O'Brien" writes: : BTW, I'm getting numbers that are 2x bigger than before :-(.I had : makebuildworld down to around 1:20 at one point, but now it is 2:40. : : Which compilers for both times? What ever was on -current as of 2.5 years ago. This