On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 11:05:55AM -0500, Jason Harmening wrote:
> > Can you try building just tcsh ? I wonder if -O0 makes any difference...
> >
> > in either case, can you give me preprocessed (clang -E) source that
> > exhibits this bug (check with objdump -d that the unaligned sse read
> > is t
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 05:46:54PM +0200, Roman Divacky wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 11:05:55AM -0500, Jason Harmening wrote:
> > > Can you try building just tcsh ? I wonder if -O0 makes any difference...
> > >
> > > in either case, can you give me preprocessed (clang -E) source that
> > > exhi
> Can you reproduce the crash with -O0 ?
>
buildworld fails w/ -O0, for the reason reported here:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2011-June/025563.html
I tried w/ -O1 a couple of weeks ago, and it had the same crashy behavior.
___
fr
On 09/17/11 11:02, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 10:34:40PM -0500, Jason Harmening wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> Using clang as the default compiler, the kernel and drivers will work
>> fine, but a lot of programs in the base system and ports will crash w/
>> SIGBUS. In fact, so
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 10:34:40PM -0500, Jason Harmening wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Using clang as the default compiler, the kernel and drivers will work
> fine, but a lot of programs in the base system and ports will crash w/
> SIGBUS. In fact, so much of the stuff in the chroot'ed world will
>
Hi everyone,
Using clang as the default compiler, the kernel and drivers will work
fine, but a lot of programs in the base system and ports will crash w/
SIGBUS. In fact, so much of the stuff in the chroot'ed world will
crash (everything from csh to gcc) that it's basically unusable. I
finally g
