Re: Cross-Development with NetBSD

2002-11-22 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 10:57:44AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: > > On 22-Nov-2002 Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 02:31:19PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: > >> > >> On 21-Nov-2002 Terry Lambert wrote: > >> > Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > >> >> On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 12:10:14AM -0700, M.

Re: Cross-Development with NetBSD

2002-11-22 Thread John Baldwin
On 22-Nov-2002 Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 02:31:19PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: >> >> On 21-Nov-2002 Terry Lambert wrote: >> > Ruslan Ermilov wrote: >> >> On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 12:10:14AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: >> >> > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> >

Re: Why isn't NOCLEAN the default? (was: Re: Cross-Development with NetBSD)

2002-11-22 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 02:48:01PM -0800, David Schultz wrote: > Thus spake Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > I have long wondered why NOCLEAN isn't the default. There seem to > > > be a few cases where it doesn't DTRT for kernel builds, but it > > > seems a bit conservative to make increme

Re: Cross-Development with NetBSD

2002-11-22 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 02:31:19PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: > > On 21-Nov-2002 Terry Lambert wrote: > > Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > >> On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 12:10:14AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: > >> > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > "Wilkinson,Alex" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes

Re: Cross-Development with NetBSD

2002-11-22 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 11:29:54AM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote: > Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > > NetBSD builds a directory full of tools that you can later use to > > > incrementally build, say, 'ls' or 'cat' because one can define > > > USETOOLS to be 'yes' and have the make automatically pick them up

Re: Why isn't NOCLEAN the default? (was: Re: Cross-Development with NetBSD)

2002-11-21 Thread David Schultz
Thus spake Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I have long wondered why NOCLEAN isn't the default. There seem to > > be a few cases where it doesn't DTRT for kernel builds, but it > > seems a bit conservative to make incremental world builds require > > that an undocumented variable be defined.

Re: Why isn't NOCLEAN the default? (was: Re: Cross-Development with NetBSD)

2002-11-21 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 02:02:20PM -0800, David Schultz wrote: > Thus spake John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Make release is a very poor example b/c make release goes to great > > efforts to create a clean-room environment for a release. make > > rerelease is quite helpful though and does do

Why isn't NOCLEAN the default? (was: Re: Cross-Development with NetBSD)

2002-11-21 Thread David Schultz
Thus spake John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Make release is a very poor example b/c make release goes to great > efforts to create a clean-room environment for a release. make > rerelease is quite helpful though and does do what you want to > restart a previous release. :) Also, make buildworl

Re: Cross-Development with NetBSD

2002-11-21 Thread Terry Lambert
Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > NetBSD builds a directory full of tools that you can later use to > > incrementally build, say, 'ls' or 'cat' because one can define > > USETOOLS to be 'yes' and have the make automatically pick them up when > > rebuilding. There are a few of the details I'm a little uncl

Re: Cross-Development with NetBSD

2002-11-21 Thread John Baldwin
On 21-Nov-2002 Terry Lambert wrote: > Ruslan Ermilov wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 12:10:14AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: >> > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > "Wilkinson,Alex" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > : Is FreeBSD likely to follow the in footsteps of NetBSD and create

Re: Cross-Development with NetBSD

2002-11-21 Thread Terry Lambert
Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 12:10:14AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: > > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > "Wilkinson,Alex" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > : Is FreeBSD likely to follow the in footsteps of NetBSD and create > > : a framework to do crossbuilds ? > >

Re: Cross-Development with NetBSD

2002-11-21 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 06:28:09AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > : On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 12:10:14AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: > : > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > : > "Wilkinson,Alex" <[E

Re: Cross-Development with NetBSD

2002-11-21 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 12:10:14AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: : > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : > "Wilkinson,Alex" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : > : Is FreeBSD likely to follow the in footstep

Re: Cross-Development with NetBSD

2002-11-21 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 12:10:14AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > "Wilkinson,Alex" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > : Is FreeBSD likely to follow the in footsteps of NetBSD and create a framework to >do crossbuilds ? > : > : http://ezine.daemonnews.org/2

Re: Cross-Development with NetBSD

2002-11-20 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Wilkinson,Alex" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : Is FreeBSD likely to follow the in footsteps of NetBSD and create a framework to do :crossbuilds ? : : http://ezine.daemonnews.org/200211/xdevnetbsd.html FreeBSD already has cross builds for a while, since

Re: Cross-Development with NetBSD

2002-11-20 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 03:19:09PM +1030, Wilkinson,Alex wrote: > Is FreeBSD likely to follow the in footsteps of NetBSD and create a framework to do >crossbuilds ? > > http://ezine.daemonnews.org/200211/xdevnetbsd.html You can already cross-build FreeBSD on a different architecture. Kris ms

Cross-Development with NetBSD

2002-11-20 Thread Wilkinson,Alex
Is FreeBSD likely to follow the in footsteps of NetBSD and create a framework to do crossbuilds ? http://ezine.daemonnews.org/200211/xdevnetbsd.html - aW To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message