On May 24, 2012, at 6:35 AM, Tim Kientzle wrote:
I think the PandaBoard ES is fully supported by U-Boot,
so it should be possible to use ubldr as part of the boot
chain for that just like I've been doing with BeagleBone.
What are the benefits of using ubldr compared to what we are doing
On Thu, 24 May 2012 10:16:42 +0200
Damjan Marion dmar...@freebsd.org wrote:
On May 24, 2012, at 6:35 AM, Tim Kientzle wrote:
I think the PandaBoard ES is fully supported by U-Boot,
so it should be possible to use ubldr as part of the boot
chain for that just like I've been doing with
On May 24, 2012, at 10:25 AM, Aleksandr Rybalko wrote:
On Thu, 24 May 2012 10:16:42 +0200
Damjan Marion dmar...@freebsd.org wrote:
On May 24, 2012, at 6:35 AM, Tim Kientzle wrote:
I think the PandaBoard ES is fully supported by U-Boot,
so it should be possible to use ubldr as part of
On Thu, 24 May 2012 11:40:19 +0200
Damjan Marion dmar...@freebsd.org wrote:
On May 24, 2012, at 10:25 AM, Aleksandr Rybalko wrote:
On Thu, 24 May 2012 10:16:42 +0200
Damjan Marion dmar...@freebsd.org wrote:
On May 24, 2012, at 6:35 AM, Tim Kientzle wrote:
I think the
On May 24, 2012, at 12:03 PM, Aleksandr Rybalko wrote:
both with FreeScale i.MX515 ARM SoC + 4M NOR for loader (I put
second uboot + ubldr into it) + 8G SSD
Didn't know that we have support for i.MX515. Is it in svn?
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org
On Thu, 24 May 2012 12:31:04 +0200
Damjan Marion dmar...@freebsd.org wrote:
On May 24, 2012, at 12:03 PM, Aleksandr Rybalko wrote:
both with FreeScale i.MX515 ARM SoC + 4M NOR for loader (I put
second uboot + ubldr into it) + 8G SSD
Didn't know that we have support for i.MX515. Is it
On May 24, 2012, at 3:40 AM, Damjan Marion wrote:
On May 24, 2012, at 10:25 AM, Aleksandr Rybalko wrote:
On Thu, 24 May 2012 10:16:42 +0200
Damjan Marion dmar...@freebsd.org wrote:
On May 24, 2012, at 6:35 AM, Tim Kientzle wrote:
I think the PandaBoard ES is fully supported by
On May 24, 2012, at 4:30 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
On May 24, 2012, at 3:40 AM, Damjan Marion wrote:
On May 24, 2012, at 10:25 AM, Aleksandr Rybalko wrote:
I was looking into this few months ago but I didn't found a value in doing
this in embedded world where we already have custom kernel for
On May 24, 2012, at 1:16 AM, Damjan Marion wrote:
On May 24, 2012, at 6:35 AM, Tim Kientzle wrote:
I think the PandaBoard ES is fully supported by U-Boot,
so it should be possible to use ubldr as part of the boot
chain for that just like I've been doing with BeagleBone.
What are the
On 05/24/12 10:58, Damjan Marion wrote:
On May 24, 2012, at 4:30 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
On May 24, 2012, at 3:40 AM, Damjan Marion wrote:
On May 24, 2012, at 10:25 AM, Aleksandr Rybalko wrote:
I was looking into this few months ago but I didn't found a value in doing
this in embedded world
This looks fine to me.
Thanks for this! What's the pandaboard require, just out of curiousity?
Adrian
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
On May 23, 2012, at 8:24 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
This looks fine to me.
Thanks for this! What's the pandaboard require, just out of curiosity?
Based on a quick skim of the OMAP 4460 TRM, it looks
like the Pandaboard ES should come up with the
same general memory layout as the BeagleBone,
In order to fully automate building SD images for Beaglebone,
I'm trying to come up with a clean way to tailor the ubldr build.
I think I've come up with a good way to do this and would appreciate any
feedback.
First, here's the (somewhat simplified) script that builds and installs ubldr
(this
13 matches
Mail list logo
