Re: Death to LKM screen savers? (was: Re: HEADS UP: i386 a.out LKM support now an option..)

1999-01-24 Thread Joao Carlos Mendes Luis
#define quoting(Alfred Perlstein) // cvs up (not cvsup) takes me a LONG time to execute, i've been using '-z3' // for comppression because i'm on dialup, is this ok with you guys? (it // doesn't help much though...) // // cvs -z3 up -Pd src // // i'm also using ssh for transport as rlogin doesn'

Re: Death to LKM screen savers? (was: Re: HEADS UP: i386 a.out LKM support now an option..)

1999-01-24 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Mark Murray writes: > Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > Doh, they were already axed by sos in late December. 'cvs co src/lkm' > > still creates directories for them though. I'm sure someone with more > > CVS experience than me will be able to explain why :) > Because you left off the "-P" "Prune empt

Re: Death to LKM screen savers? (was: Re: HEADS UP: i386 a.out LKM support now an option..)

1999-01-24 Thread David O'Brien
On Sat, Jan 23, 1999 at 09:00:58PM -0800, John Polstra wrote: > > Always use "-P" when you check out sources: "cvs co -P src/lkm". > And when you update sources already checked out, use "cvs upd -Pd". Or use a ~/.cvsrc file. Mine is: diff -u update -Pd checkout -P -- -- David(

Re: Death to LKM screen savers? (was: Re: HEADS UP: i386 a.out LKM support now an option..)

1999-01-24 Thread Mark Murray
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > Doh, they were already axed by sos in late December. 'cvs co src/lkm' > still creates directories for them though. I'm sure someone with more > CVS experience than me will be able to explain why :) Because you left off the "-P" "Prune empty directories" flag. M -- Mar

Re: Death to LKM screen savers? (was: Re: HEADS UP: i386 a.out LKM support now an option..)

1999-01-23 Thread Alfred Perlstein
On Sat, 23 Jan 1999, Mike Smith wrote: > > > Always use "-P" when you check out sources: "cvs co -P src/lkm". > > > > > > And when you update sources already checked out, use "cvs upd -Pd". > > > > cvs up (not cvsup) takes me a LONG time to execute, i've been using '-z3' > > for comppression bec

Re: Death to LKM screen savers? (was: Re: HEADS UP: i386 a.out LKM support now an option..)

1999-01-23 Thread Mike Smith
> On Sat, 23 Jan 1999, John Polstra wrote: > > > In article , > > Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > > > > > Doh, they were already axed by sos in late December. 'cvs co src/lkm' > > > still creates directories for them though. I'm sure someone with more > > > CVS experience than me will be able to

Re: Death to LKM screen savers? (was: Re: HEADS UP: i386 a.out LKM support now an option..)

1999-01-23 Thread Alfred Perlstein
On Sat, 23 Jan 1999, John Polstra wrote: > In article , > Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > > > Doh, they were already axed by sos in late December. 'cvs co src/lkm' > > still creates directories for them though. I'm sure someone with more > > CVS experience than me will be able to explain why :)

Re: Death to LKM screen savers? (was: Re: HEADS UP: i386 a.out LKM support now an option..)

1999-01-23 Thread John Polstra
In article , Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > Doh, they were already axed by sos in late December. 'cvs co src/lkm' > still creates directories for them though. I'm sure someone with more > CVS experience than me will be able to explain why :) Always use "-P" when you check out sources: "cvs co -

Re: Death to LKM screen savers? (was: Re: HEADS UP: i386 a.out LKM support now an option..)

1999-01-23 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Dag-Erling Smorgrav writes: > Kazutaka YOKOTA writes: > > What if we declare death to LKM screen savers and remove them from > > the source tree? After all KLD screen savers are working well. > Sure. I don't see any reason to keep them. I'll do the deed. Doh, they were already axed by sos in la

Re: Death to LKM screen savers? (was: Re: HEADS UP: i386 a.out LKM support now an option..)

1999-01-23 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Kazutaka YOKOTA writes: > What if we declare death to LKM screen savers and remove them from > the source tree? After all KLD screen savers are working well. Sure. I don't see any reason to keep them. I'll do the deed. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - d...@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send m

Death to LKM screen savers? (was: Re: HEADS UP: i386 a.out LKM support now an option..)

1999-01-23 Thread Kazutaka YOKOTA
What if we declare death to LKM screen savers and remove them from the source tree? After all KLD screen savers are working well. Kazu >As of a few minutes ago, I committed some changes that: >1: make the LKM code use the common VFS and syscall registration routines >2: make an 'options LKM' opt