As p...@originative.co.uk wrote...
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Peter Jeremy [mailto:peter.jer...@auss2.alcatel.com.au]
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 1999 6:21 AM
> > To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
> > Subject: Re: Directory structure on current.fr
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Jeremy [mailto:peter.jer...@auss2.alcatel.com.au]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 1999 6:21 AM
> To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
> Subject: Re: Directory structure on current.freebsd.org
>
>
> Oliver Fromme wrote:
> >In rel
Sorry I'm jumping into this in the middle.
* Oliver Fromme wrote:
* >In releases/snapshots they're called "axp" and "x86", while in
* >ports they're called "alpha" and "i386".
I'm not sure where this "axp/x86" thing is coming from, but we are
using "alpha" and "i386" in ports (and /usr/src/sy
Oliver Fromme wrote:
>In releases/snapshots they're called "axp" and "x86", while in
>ports they're called "alpha" and "i386".
I agree that having two different names is confusing.
DEC (or Compaq) literature seems to use both Alpha and AXP - I'm not
sure that either is an especially better choic
Sorry for replying to my own mail...
In list.freebsd-current I wrote:
> I'm wondering whether it might be a good idea to rename the
> directories "current" and "releng22" on {current,releng22}
> .freebsd.org to "FreeBSD-current" and "FreeBSD-stable", as
> they are named on ftp.freebsd.org.
I
Hi,
Please excuse me if this is the wrong place to ask this kind
of things...
I'm wondering whether it might be a good idea to rename the
directories "current" and "releng22" on {current,releng22}
.freebsd.org to "FreeBSD-current" and "FreeBSD-stable", as
they are named on ftp.freebsd.org.
That
