> > > It's actually not that hard to write a "libdlopen" that
> > > mmap's exectuable the ld.so itself, and then does manual
> > > lookup of the dl entry points, providing symbols for them
> > > which are actually externed functions wrapping dereferenced
> > > function pointers.
> > >
> > > It's j
Max Khon wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 03:55:28AM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > > > Is there any way to impliment dl_open in our nsswitch for -current so
> > > > that samba's winbindd can work on FreeBSD?
> > >
> > > no.
> >
> > It's actually not that hard to write a "libdlopen" that
> > mmap
hi, there!
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 03:55:28AM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > > Is there any way to impliment dl_open in our nsswitch for -current so
> > > that samba's winbindd can work on FreeBSD?
> >
> > no.
>
> It's actually not that hard to write a "libdlopen" that
> mmap's exectuable the
Martin Blapp wrote:
> > Is there any way to impliment dl_open in our nsswitch for -current so
> > that samba's winbindd can work on FreeBSD?
>
> no.
It's actually not that hard to write a "libdlopen" that
mmap's exectuable the ld.so itself, and then does manual
lookup of the dl entry points, pro
Hi,
> Is there any way to impliment dl_open in our nsswitch for -current so
> that samba's winbindd can work on FreeBSD?
no.
There are plans to write a nssd proxy deamon for FreeBSD which does support
loadable modules. I'll make nectar and my plans available in the next time.
The goal is the
Is there any way to impliment dl_open in our nsswitch for -current so
that samba's winbindd can work on FreeBSD?
- Forwarded message from Richard Sharpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 11:29:24 +1030
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Richard Sharpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "
