If memory serves me right, Craig Reyenga wrote:
No matter what, disc#1 has a finite amount of space and it's going to be
impossible to come up with a combination of packages that keeps everyone
happy. Sooner or later, popular comes down to somebody's judgement.
To see what's currently in
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003 11:46:43 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the meantime we _really_ have to ship 5.0-RELEASE, we keep
slipping it.
That sounds like it's time to ship so we're going to ship.
I'm not trying to get up anyone's nose here, but aren't there
objective release criteria?
To
On (2003/01/14 10:22), local.freebsd.current wrote:
In the meantime we _really_ have to ship 5.0-RELEASE, we keep
slipping it.
That sounds like it's time to ship so we're going to ship.
I'm not trying to get up anyone's nose here, but aren't there
objective release criteria?
Yes. One
Sheldon Hearn wrote:
On (2003/01/14 10:22), local.freebsd.current wrote:
In the meantime we _really_ have to ship 5.0-RELEASE, we keep
slipping it.
That sounds like it's time to ship so we're going to ship.
I'm not trying to get up anyone's nose here, but aren't there
objective
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.com, local.freebsd.current writes:
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003 11:46:43 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the meantime we _really_ have to ship 5.0-RELEASE, we keep
slipping it.
That sounds like it's time to ship so we're going to ship.
That's it.
I'm not trying to get
+ Sheldon Hearn [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
| On (2003/01/14 10:22), local.freebsd.current wrote:
|
| I'm not trying to get up anyone's nose here, but aren't there
| objective release criteria?
|
| Yes. One of the release criteria is that it come into existence. :-)
Indeed. There is an old story
On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, Andy Farkas wrote:
Once again it's my pleasure to announce Release Cadidate 3 of
FreeBSD 5.0.
Perhaps I do things in a non-standard way, but its worked for the last 8
years from 2.x through to 4.7-stable.
Firstly, I download 'floppies' and create the 2 boot
On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
On (2003/01/14 10:22), local.freebsd.current wrote:
In the meantime we _really_ have to ship 5.0-RELEASE, we keep
slipping it.
That sounds like it's time to ship so we're going to ship.
I'm not trying to get up anyone's nose here, but
On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, Trish Lynch wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, Andy Farkas wrote:
Perhaps I do things in a non-standard way, but its worked for the last 8
years from 2.x through to 4.7-stable.
Firstly, I download 'floppies' and create the 2 boot disks, kern.flp and
mgsroot.flp. Then I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
..com, local.freebsd.current writes:
That sounds like it's time to ship so we're going to ship.
That's it.
I'm not trying to get up anyone's nose here, but aren't there
objective release criteria?
yes: No more delays :-)
I think
On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, Trish Lynch wrote:
I just want to point out, POLA really only applies to -STABLE, and we're
talking very specifically about -CURRENT.
IN -CURRENT, substantial changes can be made with little warning, and only
documentation sometimes (most of the time, people give a
I haven't actually tried 5.0RC3 yet, so what I'm about to say may be
irrelevant, but here goes:
One thing I noticed in previous releases is that the choice of packages is a
little odd. Many small packages and ones that are not popular seem to make
it on the first CD, while bigger and/or more
Craig Reyenga wrote:
One thing I noticed in previous releases is that the choice of
packages is a
little odd. Many small packages and ones that are not popular seem to make
it on the first CD, while bigger and/or more popular ones are stuck being
fetched+built manually after. This can be a pain
On Wed, 2003-01-15 at 14:25, Keith Jones wrote:
Craig Reyenga wrote:
One thing I noticed in previous releases is that the choice of
packages is a
little odd. Many small packages and ones that are not popular seem to make
it on the first CD, while bigger and/or more popular ones are
These mentioned licensing issues make sense, however I still think that
there should be some sort of system to ensure big and/or popular packages to
make it to CD #1.
-Craig
One thing I noticed in previous releases is that the choice of
packages is a
little odd. Many small packages and
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 08:14:11PM -0500, Craig Reyenga wrote:
I haven't actually tried 5.0RC3 yet, so what I'm about to say may be
irrelevant, but here goes:
One thing I noticed in previous releases is that the choice of packages is a
little odd. Many small packages and ones that are not
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 09:44:06PM -0500, Craig Reyenga wrote:
These mentioned licensing issues make sense, however I still think that
there should be some sort of system to ensure big and/or popular packages to
make it to CD #1.
Request it.
Bear in mind that disc 1 has limited free space.
If memory serves me right, Craig Reyenga wrote:
These mentioned licensing issues make sense, however I still think that
there should be some sort of system to ensure big and/or popular packages to
make it to CD #1.
No matter what, disc#1 has a finite amount of space and it's going to be
Harald Hanche-Olsen wrote:
Indeed. There is an old story from the days of the big irons, when
IBM had an objective release criterion stating that no new release
of their OS would be shipped with more than 100 major bugs.
As a result, before each release, the engineers would have a big
meeting
No matter what, disc#1 has a finite amount of space and it's going to be
impossible to come up with a combination of packages that keeps everyone
happy. Sooner or later, popular comes down to somebody's judgement.
To see what's currently in the package split, look at
I would like to point to a currently unresolved issue that Thomas Moestl is
helping me solve on freebsd-sparc@. It isn't listed on the Open Issues page,
but I'd say it's something that needs to be resolved before the release is
rolled.
The thread is titled panic: trap: fast data access mmu miss
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Roderick van Domburg writes:
I would like to point to a currently unresolved issue that Thomas Moestl is
helping me solve on freebsd-sparc@. It isn't listed on the Open Issues page,
but I'd say it's something that needs to be resolved before the release is
rolled.
Once again it's my pleasure to announce Release Cadidate 3 of
FreeBSD 5.0.
Perhaps I do things in a non-standard way, but its worked for the last 8
years from 2.x through to 4.7-stable.
Firstly, I download 'floppies' and create the 2 boot disks, kern.flp and
mgsroot.flp. Then I download
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 03:22:02AM +1000, Andy Farkas wrote:
Once again it's my pleasure to announce Release Cadidate 3 of
FreeBSD 5.0.
Sysinstall complains about not being able to find the 'crypto' stuff, but
thats ok - its always done that.
Obviously, this isn't okay.
No go for
Why does pkg_install now need libssl?
troutmask:kargl[251] ldd /usr/sbin/pkg_add
/usr/sbin/pkg_add:
libfetch.so.3 = /usr/lib/libfetch.so.3 (0x28074000)
libmd.so.2 = /usr/lib/libmd.so.2 (0x2808)
libssl.so.2 = /usr/lib/libssl.so.2 (0x2808a000)
Le Monday 13 January 2003 18:22, Andy Farkas a écrit :
[SNIP]
# pkg_add cvsup-without-gui-16.1f.tgz
/usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libssl.so.2 not found
#
Why does pkg_install now need libssl?
indeed :
(see
Le Monday 13 January 2003 18:22, Andy Farkas a écrit :
French is such a sexy language... :)
indeed :
(see
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/usr.sbin/pkg_install/add/Makefile#rev1.15)
Again, the acronym POLA springs to mind
--
:{ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Andy Farkas
If memory serves me right, Andy Farkas wrote:
Once again it's my pleasure to announce Release Cadidate 3 of
FreeBSD 5.0.
Perhaps I do things in a non-standard way, but its worked for the last 8
years from 2.x through to 4.7-stable.
Firstly, I download 'floppies' and create the 2
All,
Once again it's my pleasure to announce Release Cadidate 3 of
FreeBSD 5.0. i386, pc98, alpha, ia64, and sparc64 releases are
available on most mirrors now. Thanks to Marcel Moolenaar
for providing the ia64 bits, Takahashi Yoshihiro for proving the
pc98 bits, and David Obrien for the
(see below, my question got answered already)
Joe Laughlin wrote:
Scott Long wrote:
All,
Once again it's my pleasure to announce Release Cadidate 3 of
FreeBSD 5.0. i386, pc98, alpha, ia64, and sparc64 releases are
available on most mirrors now. Thanks to Marcel Moolenaar
for
30 matches
Mail list logo
