On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 3:01 AM, Tom Evans tevans...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 8:26 PM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
m.e.sanlit...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear All ,
Previously , in the following message , I have mentioned effect of memory
chip placement on execution speed :
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 8:26 PM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
m.e.sanlit...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear All ,
Previously , in the following message , I have mentioned effect of memory
chip placement on execution speed :
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2012-February/031836.html
Effect
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
m.e.sanlit...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 3:01 AM, Tom Evans tevans...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 8:26 PM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
m.e.sanlit...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear All ,
Previously , in the
In message
CAFHbX1KkD7fWP+KZNrSjzCStUM_Smjw7GdKDTo=djjmoe5t...@mail.gmail.com, Tom Evans
writes:
You say this, have you actually measured/checked. sysutils/dmidecode
will interrogate your BIOS and tell us what it thinks is installed in
each RAM socket. It is not uncommon for RAM to say one
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 4:54 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp p...@phk.freebsd.dkwrote:
In message CAFHbX1KkD7fWP+KZNrSjzCStUM_Smjw7GdKDTo=
djjmoe5t...@mail.gmail.com, Tom Evans writes:
You say this, have you actually measured/checked. sysutils/dmidecode
will interrogate your BIOS and tell us what it
On 03/18/13 07:18, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 4:54 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp p...@phk.freebsd.dkwrote:
In message CAFHbX1KkD7fWP+KZNrSjzCStUM_Smjw7GdKDTo=
djjmoe5t...@mail.gmail.com, Tom Evans writes:
You say this, have you actually measured/checked. sysutils/dmidecode
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 6:26 AM, Nathan Whitehorn nwhiteh...@freebsd.orgwrote:
On 03/18/13 07:18, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 4:54 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp p...@phk.freebsd.dk
wrote:
In message CAFHbX1KkD7fWP+KZNrSjzCStUM_Smjw7GdKDTo=
djjmoe5t...@mail.gmail.com,
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 6:26 AM, Nathan Whitehorn nwhiteh...@freebsd.orgwrote:
On 03/18/13 07:18, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 4:54 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp p...@phk.freebsd.dk
wrote:
In message CAFHbX1KkD7fWP+KZNrSjzCStUM_Smjw7GdKDTo=
djjmoe5t...@mail.gmail.com,
- Original Message -
From: Nathan Whitehorn nwhiteh...@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2013 1:26 PM
Subject: Re: FreeBSD is very slow when Memory chip sizes are imbalanced in slots
On 03/18/13 07:18, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
On Mon, Mar 18,
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 7:47 AM, Steven Hartland kill...@multiplay.co.ukwrote:
- Original Message - From: Nathan Whitehorn
nwhiteh...@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2013 1:26 PM
Subject: Re: FreeBSD is very slow when Memory chip sizes are
- Original Message -
From: Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
Surely you can eliminate all of those and confirm / deny the original
diagnosis by simply installing balanced memory in the machine and checking
to see if the problem goes away?
Please see links in my previous mails .
All of these are
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 8:09 AM, Steven Hartland kill...@multiplay.co.ukwrote:
- Original Message - From: Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
Surely you can eliminate all of those and confirm / deny the original
diagnosis by simply installing balanced memory in the machine and
checking
to see if
- Original Message - From: Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
Surely you can eliminate all of those and confirm / deny the original
diagnosis by simply installing balanced memory in the machine and
checking
to see if the problem goes away?
Please see links in my previous mails .
All of these
In message d956b1ee70984978bcb396a9796ea...@multiplay.co.uk, Steven
Hartland writes:
You state there that The main boards are the same which indicates to me
the machines aren't the same machine which could result in some other subtle
difference causing the problem.
To confirm you'll need to use
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 8:26 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp p...@phk.freebsd.dkwrote:
In message d956b1ee70984978bcb396a9796ea...@multiplay.co.uk, Steven
Hartland writes:
You state there that The main boards are the same which indicates to me
the machines aren't the same machine which could result in
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 8:21 AM, Steven Hartland kill...@multiplay.co.ukwrote:
**
- Original Message - From: Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
Surely you can eliminate all of those and confirm / deny the original
diagnosis by simply installing balanced memory in the machine and
checking
- Original Message -
From: Mehmet Erol Sanliturk m.e.sanlit...@gmail.com
You state there that The main boards are the same which indicates to me
the machines aren't the same machine which could result in some other
subtle
difference causing the problem.
To confirm you'll need to use
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 8:41 AM, Steven Hartland kill...@multiplay.co.ukwrote:
- Original Message - From: Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
m.e.sanlit...@gmail.com
You state there that The main boards are the same which indicates to me
the machines aren't the same machine which could result
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
m.e.sanlit...@gmail.com wrote:
Computer A : Memory Chip Sizes : ( 2 GB , 1 GB , 2 GB , 1 GB ) : Working
SLOW . FreeBSD A
Computer B : Memory Chip Sizes : ( 2 GB , 2 GB , 2 GB , 2 GB ) : Working
FAST . FreeBSD B
Interchange memory chips
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Scot Hetzel swhet...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
m.e.sanlit...@gmail.com wrote:
Computer A : Memory Chip Sizes : ( 2 GB , 1 GB , 2 GB , 1 GB ) : Working
SLOW . FreeBSD A
Computer B : Memory Chip Sizes : ( 2 GB
Dear All ,
I tried the following on Nathan Whitehorn's suggestions :
I have disabled ~/.xinitrc , leaving X with its default window manager .
I have started Firefox . The same slow behavior !
The problem starts after STARTING X . The rest ( FluxBox , KDE , Gnome )
seems to be innocent .
If
On 2013-03-18 21:43, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Scot Hetzel swhet...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
m.e.sanlit...@gmail.com wrote:
Computer A : Memory Chip Sizes : ( 2 GB , 1 GB , 2 GB , 1 GB ) : Working
SLOW .
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 2:28 PM, olli hauer oha...@gmx.de wrote:
On 2013-03-18 21:43, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Scot Hetzel swhet...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
m.e.sanlit...@gmail.com wrote:
Computer A :
Dear All ,
Previously , in the following message , I have mentioned effect of memory
chip placement on execution speed :
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2012-February/031836.html
Effect of Processor and Memory on KDE4 execution
24 matches
Mail list logo
