Re: HEADS UP: truss(1) out of commission

2001-12-04 Thread Bruce Evans
On 4 Dec 2001, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Bruce Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Please only commit working code. Tell that to the author of truss(1) (who also wrote procfs(5) in the first place). It used to work. Did it not work when it was first committed? Anyway, there are many more

Re: HEADS UP: truss(1) out of commission

2001-12-04 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Bruce Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] [011204 13:43] wrote: On 4 Dec 2001, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Bruce Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Please only commit working code. Tell that to the author of truss(1) (who also wrote procfs(5) in the first place). It used to work. Did it not

Re: HEADS UP: truss(1) out of commission

2001-12-04 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Bruce Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Please only commit working code. Tell that to the author of truss(1) (who also wrote procfs(5) in the first place). DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body

HEADS UP: truss(1) out of commission

2001-12-03 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
I'm about to commit patches to procfs(5) that will (unfortunately) temporarily disable truss(1), until I finish extending ptrace(2) and rewriting truss(1) to use that instead of procfs(5) (or find a quiet moment to figure out why my legacy support code doesn't work). Until then, use ktrace(1)

Re: HEADS UP: truss(1) out of commission

2001-12-03 Thread Bruce Evans
On 4 Dec 2001, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: I'm about to commit patches to procfs(5) that will (unfortunately) temporarily disable truss(1), until I finish extending ptrace(2) and rewriting truss(1) to use that instead of procfs(5) (or find a quiet moment to figure out why my legacy support