Re: IPFW in CURRENT: SMP-friendly?

2013-03-07 Thread O. Hartmann
Am 03/07/13 16:48, schrieb Gleb Smirnoff: > On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 01:31:19PM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote: > O> There is work going on to move the OpenBSD pf(1) towards a more SMP > O> friendly entity - this reduces CPU load and should raise throughput. > O> > O> Are there any plans for FreeBSD "nat

Re: IPFW in CURRENT: SMP-friendly?

2013-03-07 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 01:31:19PM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote: O> There is work going on to move the OpenBSD pf(1) towards a more SMP O> friendly entity - this reduces CPU load and should raise throughput. O> O> Are there any plans for FreeBSD "native" packet filter IPFW2 to gain the O> same? Or, to

IPFW in CURRENT: SMP-friendly?

2013-03-07 Thread O. Hartmann
There is work going on to move the OpenBSD pf(1) towards a more SMP friendly entity - this reduces CPU load and should raise throughput. Are there any plans for FreeBSD "native" packet filter IPFW2 to gain the same? Or, to ask it differently, IS ipfw(1), the freeBSD native packetfilter, already SM