On Sat, 4 Dec 1999, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> Unfortunately, that will probably mean no openssh out of the box, since it
> depends on RSA :-(
When the RSA patent runs out, there will be pretty much no problem with
having OpenSSL without RSAREF in the tree. In that case, I wouldn't
mind being the F
On Sat, 4 Dec 1999, Mark Murray wrote:
> > I think it's high time we expanded our cryptographic support beyond the
> > bare minimum of DES - anyone violently disagree?
>
> On the contrary; I violently agree!
>
> We need to make OpenSSH work with K5 as a matter of priority.
I'm accepting "{,cvs
< said:
> NO. There are not patent problems until you *USE* the code.
That's not clear. See also ``contributory infringement''.
-GAWollman
--
Garrett A. Wollman | O Siem / We are all family / O Siem / We're all the same
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | O Siem / The fires of freedom
Opinions not those
> > It looks like they distribute RSA to everyone, including the US mirrors,
> > and it's not built by default unless you take explicit action to enable it
> > (i.e. it just builds a subset of the full distribution). Last time I
>
> Hmm, according to their own press, there's some mechanism more c
> Last time I raised this, a few people expressed concerns about their
> mirrors carrying patented code which might cause them legal issues,
NO. There are not patent problems until you *USE* the code.
The issue is the export of encryption from the US. That is the concern
with RSA and IDEA. You
On Sat, 4 Dec 1999, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
> > It looks like they distribute RSA to everyone, including the US mirrors,
> > and it's not built by default unless you take explicit action to enable it
> > (i.e. it just builds a subset of the full distribution). Last time I
>
> Hmm, according to
> It looks like they distribute RSA to everyone, including the US mirrors,
> and it's not built by default unless you take explicit action to enable it
> (i.e. it just builds a subset of the full distribution). Last time I
Hmm, according to their own press, there's some mechanism more clever
than
On Fri, 3 Dec 1999, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
> I think you should look at exactly how OpenBSD 2.6 has integrated it
> and then report back with your amended proposal. :-)
It looks like they distribute RSA to everyone, including the US mirrors,
and it's not built by default unless you take explic
> I think it's high time we expanded our cryptographic support beyond the
> bare minimum of DES - anyone violently disagree?
On the contrary; I violently agree!
We need to make OpenSSH work with K5 as a matter of priority.
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To
I think you should look at exactly how OpenBSD 2.6 has integrated it
and then report back with your amended proposal. :-)
- Jordan
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
I would like to get OpenSSL imported into -current. I currently have the
build framework almost ready to go, I'm just running some buildworld tests
to make sure it's working properly.
OpenSSL would give a number of potential benefits. Some of the coolest
ones are:
* Precursor to importing OpenSS
11 matches
Mail list logo
