Hi,
I hit a kernel panic running a fresh -CURRENT today. This machine is my home NFS
server and it exports src and obj to a bunch of other machines. During an
installkernel on one of the other machines (using the src and obj exports from
the NFS server) the NFS server kernel paniced.
I took a qui
Joel Dahl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I hit a kernel panic running a fresh -CURRENT today. This machine is my home
> NFS
> server and it exports src and obj to a bunch of other machines. During an
> installkernel on one of the other machines (using the src and obj exports
> from
> the NFS server) the NFS ser
Joel Dahl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I hit a kernel panic running a fresh -CURRENT today. This machine is my home
> NFS
> server and it exports src and obj to a bunch of other machines. During an
> installkernel on one of the other machines (using the src and obj exports
> from
> the NFS server) the NFS ser
> I'm going to guess that you're using an "em" net driver, since that is the
> only one that sets if_hw_tsomax > IP_MAXPACKET (65535) from what I can see.
>
> Sean, EM_TSO_SIZE is defined as (65535 + sizeof(struct ether_vlan_header)),
> which makes it > IP_MAXPACKET. The value of if_hw_tsomax m
On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 11:25:58AM -0700, Sean Bruno wrote:
>
>
>
> > I'm going to guess that you're using an "em" net driver, since that is the
> > only one that sets if_hw_tsomax > IP_MAXPACKET (65535) from what I can see.
> >
> > Sean, EM_TSO_SIZE is defined as (65535 + sizeof(struct ether_v
On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 08:57:40AM -0400, Rick Macklem wrote:
> Joel Dahl wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I hit a kernel panic running a fresh -CURRENT today. This machine is my home
> > NFS
> > server and it exports src and obj to a bunch of other machines. During an
> > installkernel on one of the other
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 08/23/15 18:36, Yonghyeon PYUN wrote:
> Index: sys/dev/e1000/if_em.c
> ===
>
>
- --- sys/dev/e1000/if_em.c (revision 287087)
> +++ sys/dev/e1000/if_em.c (working copy) @@
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 11:18:00AM -0700, Sean Bruno wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
>
>
> On 08/23/15 18:36, Yonghyeon PYUN wrote:
> > Index: sys/dev/e1000/if_em.c
> > ===
> >
> >
> - --- sys/dev/e100
On 08/25/15 12:10, Joel Dahl wrote:
>> > Seems to work. However, I cannot reproduce the user panic in the first
>> > place. What's the scenario that seems to work here? NFS seems happy
>> > with/without the patch so I'm not confident in anything we are doing her
>> > e.
> I see several patches
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 12:55:02PM -0700, Sean Bruno wrote:
>
>
> On 08/25/15 12:10, Joel Dahl wrote:
> >> > Seems to work. However, I cannot reproduce the user panic in the first
> >> > place. What's the scenario that seems to work here? NFS seems happy
> >> > with/without the patch so I'm not
On 08/29/15 00:38, Joel Dahl wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 12:55:02PM -0700, Sean Bruno wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 08/25/15 12:10, Joel Dahl wrote:
> Seems to work. However, I cannot reproduce the user panic in the first
> place. What's the scenario that seems to work here? NFS seems happy
>
11 matches
Mail list logo
