On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, Makoto Matsushita wrote:
I'm now trying Terry's patch (just rebuilding a kernel).
jroberson You are using 100mb of KVA for malloc(9)? Are you certain
jroberson that you don't have a memory leak?
Maybe there's a chance of a memory leakage by GLOBAL, but I don't sure.
After upgrading my 5-current box (as of late September 2002), the
kernel panics periodically with following message:
panic: kmem_malloc(4096): kmem_map too small: 107651072 total allocated
The number '4096' and '107651072' is always the same. What am I
missing something?
-- -
Makoto
Makoto Matsushita wrote:
After upgrading my 5-current box (as of late September 2002), the
kernel panics periodically with following message:
panic: kmem_malloc(4096): kmem_map too small: 107651072 total allocated
The number '4096' and '107651072' is always the same. What am I
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Makoto Matsushita wrote:
After upgrading my 5-current box (as of late September 2002), the
kernel panics periodically with following message:
panic: kmem_malloc(4096): kmem_map too small: 107651072 total allocated
The number '4096' and '107651072' is always the
