Re: Latest version of mega header file POSIX update

Back on March 15/2001, Garrett Wollman wrote: >I have finally produced another version of the big header file patch >for people to look at. I'm still running an older (January) kernel >and world based on these changes. I have verified that these still >build on i386-architecture systems. I'm lo

Re: Latest version of mega header file POSIX update

On Thu, 15 Mar 2001, Garrett Wollman wrote: > The patch has now gotten too large for some e-mail systems, so I'm > making it available via the Web at > . Please include it in the mail anyway so that it is easier to see and reply if the e-mail system a

RE: Latest version of mega header file POSIX update

On 16-Mar-01 Garrett Wollman wrote: > < > said: > >> Nothing else jumped out at me while I glanced over it however, and >> it seems fine at first glance. > > But did you *test* it? I know it compiles. No, not yet. I can try it out on my SMP and alpha testboxes here, though my the witness_ex

RE: Latest version of mega header file POSIX update

< said: > I don't think the sys/conf/Makefile.i386 change is needed. :) Oops. Sorry, that one leaked out > Nothing else jumped out at me while I glanced over it however, and > it seems fine at first glance. But did you *test* it? I know it compiles. -GAWollman To Unsubscribe: send ma

RE: Latest version of mega header file POSIX update

On 15-Mar-01 Garrett Wollman wrote: > The patch has now gotten too large for some e-mail systems, so I'm > making it available via the Web at > . I don't think the sys/conf/Makefile.i386 change is needed. :) Nothing else jumped out at me while I glan

Latest version of mega header file POSIX update

I have finally produced another version of the big header file patch for people to look at. I'm still running an older (January) kernel and world based on these changes. I have verified that these still build on i386-architecture systems. I'm looking for some people to do the following: 1) Loo