2011/3/9 Vinícius Zavam
> > Ok. Exactly which model laptop is it? Maybe you're suffering similar
> issues
> > to my AR2427 (which is an AR9285 w/out the 11n bits all enabled in the
> > silicon.)
> >
>
> asus eeepc 1005PE
>
>
I can't seem to get a cheap one locally; does anyone have one with t
2011/3/8 Adrian Chadd :
> 2011/3/8 Vinícius Zavam
>
>>
>> i've done it before. did not receive my mail?
>> hmm... maybe it's because i attached and carbon copied current@ and
>> mobile@.
>>
>> will mail it to you ASAP.
>
> I believe it's in my inbox. Thanks.
>
>>
>> > Are you able to crack open th
2011/3/8 Vinícius Zavam
> i've done it before. did not receive my mail?
> hmm... maybe it's because i attached and carbon copied current@ and
> mobile@.
>
> will mail it to you ASAP.
I believe it's in my inbox. Thanks.
> > Are you able to crack open the laptop and write down the exact detail
Thanks. I'd really like to know what the exact model/manufacturer of the
card is. are you easily able to remove it from your laptop and take some
clear photos?
adrian
2011/3/8 Vinícius Zavam
> 2011/3/8 Vinícius Zavam :
> > 2011/3/8 Adrian Chadd :
> >> That's not enough info; what about the ve
2011/3/8 Vinícius Zavam :
> 2011/3/8 Adrian Chadd :
>> That's not enough info; what about the versions of files in sys/dev/ath ?
>>
>>
>> Adrian
>
> ops. shame on me.
>
>> 2011/3/8 Vinícius Zavam
>>>
>>> 2011/3/7 Adrian Chadd :
>>> > Which version of the driver are you using?
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Adr
2011/3/8 Adrian Chadd :
>
>
> 2011/3/8 Vinícius Zavam
>>
>>
>> it's "true".
>> works for me, but i need to put my netbook less than 1meter from my
>> access point, when using freebsd ;(
>>
>> somewhere else i've tryed to send icmp echo requests to my gw got
>> nothing but "bb hang detected".
>> my
2011/3/8 Adrian Chadd :
> That's not enough info; what about the versions of files in sys/dev/ath ?
>
>
> Adrian
ops. shame on me.
> 2011/3/8 Vinícius Zavam
>>
>> 2011/3/7 Adrian Chadd :
>> > Which version of the driver are you using?
>> >
>> >
>> > Adrian
sys/dev/ath/ah_osdep.c: * $FreeBSD: sr
2011/3/8 Vinícius Zavam
>
>
> it's "true".
> works for me, but i need to put my netbook less than 1meter from my
> access point, when using freebsd ;(
>
> somewhere else i've tryed to send icmp echo requests to my gw got
> nothing but "bb hang detected".
> my `ifconfig wlan0 list scan` returns ju
That's not enough info; what about the versions of files in sys/dev/ath ?
Adrian
2011/3/8 Vinícius Zavam
> 2011/3/7 Adrian Chadd :
> > Which version of the driver are you using?
> >
> >
> > Adrian
>
> # $FreeBSD: src/sys/modules/ath/Makefile,v 1.19 2011/03/02 17:19:54 adrian
> Exp $
>
> > 201
2011/1/22 Adrian Chadd :
> So it's all completely stable for you too right now?
>
>
>
> adrian
>
> 2011/1/22 Dima Panov :
>> Hello!
>>
>> 22.01.2011, 13:56, "Adrian Chadd" :
>>> On 20 January 2011 13:51, Adrian Chadd ; wrote:
>>>
Hi everyone,
I'm in the process of merging in the no
2011/3/7 Adrian Chadd :
> Which version of the driver are you using?
>
>
> Adrian
# $FreeBSD: src/sys/modules/ath/Makefile,v 1.19 2011/03/02 17:19:54 adrian Exp $
> 2011/3/7 Vinícius Zavam
>>
>> 2011/1/23 Adrian Chadd :
>> > You'll have to compile in the diag api.
>> >
>> > Just add these:
>> >
Which version of the driver are you using?
Adrian
2011/3/7 Vinícius Zavam
> 2011/1/23 Adrian Chadd :
> > You'll have to compile in the diag api.
> >
> > Just add these:
> >
> > options ATH_DIAGAPI
> >
> >
> >
> > Adrian
> >
> > 2011/1/23 Dima Panov :
> >> Hello!
> >>
> >> 23.01.2011,
You'll have to compile in the diag api.
Just add these:
options ATH_DIAGAPI
Adrian
2011/1/23 Dima Panov :
> Hello!
>
> 23.01.2011, 09:47, "Adrian Chadd" :
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've just committed a new tool in src/tools/tools/ath/ called ath_prom_dump .
>>
>> It dumps the contents of the
Hello!
23.01.2011, 09:47, "Adrian Chadd" :
> Hi all,
>
> I've just committed a new tool in src/tools/tools/ath/ called ath_prom_dump .
>
> It dumps the contents of the atheros EEPROM into a text file for later
> analysis.
>
> I don't have any AR9285's handy; if you have an AR9285, would you
> ple
Make sure you're absolutely, positively not doing power saving stuff.
I'm quite certain the ar5416+ HAL is just not doing the right thing
re: power saving mode.
Adrian
On 23 January 2011 13:55, Ian FREISLICH wrote:
> Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> I haven't changed anything on the AR9285 codebase that
Adrian Chadd wrote:
> I haven't changed anything on the AR9285 codebase that would account
> for the above.
That maybe. The visible difference in behaviour is that when there's
no traffic, the reported rate drops to 1Mbps. As soon as there's
traffic it jumps to 54Mbps.
> Something to keep in mi
On 23 January 2011 07:47, b. f. wrote:
>> Nope, sorry. I can only do two things at a time. :)
>
> I didn't mean immediately, but at some point in the not-too-distant
> future. Or do you lack the hardware, if not the time?
All of the above, sorry.
The atheros wifi hacking is mostly a spare-time
Hi all,
I've just committed a new tool in src/tools/tools/ath/ called ath_prom_dump .
It dumps the contents of the atheros EEPROM into a text file for later analysis.
I don't have any AR9285's handy; if you have an AR9285, would you
please send me a hexdump of the EEPROM along with the contents
On 1/22/11, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 23 January 2011 01:11, b. f. wrote:
>
>> Would you look to see if any of your improvements can also be used by
>> uath(4)?
>
> Nope, sorry. I can only do two things at a time. :)
I didn't mean immediately, but at some point in the not-too-distant
future. Or
On 23 January 2011 01:11, b. f. wrote:
> Would you look to see if any of your improvements can also be used by uath(4)?
Nope, sorry. I can only do two things at a time. :)
Adrian
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/m
On 23 January 2011 02:28, Ian FREISLICH wrote:
>> Someone's reported that the AR9285 was once stable but now isn't. I'd
>> really appreciate it if others who are using AR9280/AR9285 chipsets
>> would test this out and get back to me.
>
> Oddly enough, I think my AR9285 uses less power now. This
Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 20 January 2011 13:51, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I'm in the process of merging in the non-intrusive changes to the
> > if_ath code into -HEAD.
>
> Ok, so I lied - the ANI changes were slightly intrusive. But all in
> all the code was just shuffled aroun
Adrian Chadd wrote:
> 2011/1/22 Dima Panov :
>
> > 22.01.2011, 22:19, "Adrian Chadd" :
> This is why I really do need this tested as much as possible. I'll put
> up instructions on how to build if_ath as a module (that's what I'm
> doing on my RELENG_8 EEEPC - I'm running the HEAD if_ath on it for
2011/1/22 Dima Panov :
> 22.01.2011, 22:19, "Adrian Chadd" :
>> So it's all completely stable for you too right now?
>>
>
> Yes, almost 7 hours with new kernel and no errors.
> Stable as all previous revisions.
>
> Wait a 802.11n support to utilize it with my home and office hotspots :)
:) That's
hello!
22.01.2011, 22:19, "Adrian Chadd" :
> So it's all completely stable for you too right now?
>
Yes, almost 7 hours with new kernel and no errors.
Stable as all previous revisions.
Wait a 802.11n support to utilize it with my home and office hotspots :)
> adrian
>
> 2011/1/22 Dima Panov ;
So it's all completely stable for you too right now?
adrian
2011/1/22 Dima Panov :
> Hello!
>
> 22.01.2011, 13:56, "Adrian Chadd" :
>> On 20 January 2011 13:51, Adrian Chadd ; wrote:
>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> I'm in the process of merging in the non-intrusive changes to the
>>> if_ath code
Hello!
22.01.2011, 13:56, "Adrian Chadd" :
> On 20 January 2011 13:51, Adrian Chadd ; wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I'm in the process of merging in the non-intrusive changes to the
>> if_ath code into -HEAD.
>
> Ok, so I lied - the ANI changes were slightly intrusive. But all in
> all the cod
On 20 January 2011 13:51, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm in the process of merging in the non-intrusive changes to the
> if_ath code into -HEAD.
Ok, so I lied - the ANI changes were slightly intrusive. But all in
all the code was just shuffled around a bit.
Someone's reported that th
Dnia czwartek, 20 stycznia 2011 o 10:44:27 Max Khon napisał(a):
> Adrian,
>
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Adrian Chadd
> wrote:
>
> I'm in the process of merging in the non-intrusive changes to the
>
> > if_ath code into -HEAD.
> >
> > I'd appreciate some testing just to ensure I haven't
Adrian,
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
I'm in the process of merging in the non-intrusive changes to the
> if_ath code into -HEAD.
>
> I'd appreciate some testing just to ensure I haven't broken anything
> terribly obvious.
>
Any chances for proper support for Atheros 802.
On 20 January 2011 17:44, Max Khon wrote:
> Any chances for proper support for Atheros 802.11n cards?
> Should not we just port ath9k (Linux) or athn (OpenBSD) drivers?
*grin* I have the beginnings of functioning 802.11n support.
This stuff is just structural precursors to that. I'm just tidyin
Hi everyone,
I'm in the process of merging in the non-intrusive changes to the
if_ath code into -HEAD.
I'd appreciate some testing just to ensure I haven't broken anything
terribly obvious.
Thanks,
Adrian
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
32 matches
Mail list logo
