Am 10.10.21 um 05:52 schrieb Alan Somers:
> On Sat, Oct 9, 2021 at 7:13 PM Rick Macklem wrote>>
> This leads me to a couple of questions:
>> - Is there a good reason for not using vop_stdallocate() for ZFS?
>
> Yes. posix_fallocate is supposed to guarantee that subsequent writes
> to the file w
On 10-10-2021 07:57, Rick Macklem wrote:
This leads me to a couple of questions:
- Is there a good reason for not using vop_stdallocate() for ZFS?
Yes. posix_fallocate is supposed to guarantee that subsequent writes
to the file will not fail with ENOSPC. But ZFS, being a copy-on-write
file s
back later to rewrite those same offsets, ZFS
> will actually allocate new LBAs for them.
Eighto. I get it now.
Looks like I must disable it in the server, unless there is a way to enable
it on a per file system basis (which I don not believe is the case for NFSv4.2,
although that isn't com
gt;> UFS - supports VOP_ALLOCATE() by using vop_stdallocate().
> >> ZFS - just return EINVAL for VOP_ALLOCATE().
> >>
> >> An NFSv4.2 server can either support Allocate or not, but it has to be
> >> for all exported file systems.
> >
> >That seems like a pr
- supports VOP_ALLOCATE() by using vop_stdallocate().
> >> ZFS - just return EINVAL for VOP_ALLOCATE().
> >>
> >> An NFSv4.2 server can either support Allocate or not, but it has to be
> >> for all exported file systems.
> >
> >That seems like a protoc
Alan Somers wrote:
>On Sat, Oct 9, 2021 at 7:13 PM Rick Macklem wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I ran into an issue this week during the nf...@ietf.org's testing event.
>> UFS - supports VOP_ALLOCATE() by using vop_stdallocate().
>> ZFS - just return EINVAL for
From: Alan Somers
Sent: Saturday, October 9, 2021 11:52 PM
To: Rick Macklem
Cc: FreeBSD Current
Subject: Re: RFC: Use of VOP_ALLOCATE() by NFSV4.2 nfsd
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the University of Guelph. Do not
click links or open
On Sat, Oct 9, 2021 at 7:13 PM Rick Macklem wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I ran into an issue this week during the nf...@ietf.org's testing event.
> UFS - supports VOP_ALLOCATE() by using vop_stdallocate().
> ZFS - just return EINVAL for VOP_ALLOCATE().
>
> An NFSv4.2 server c
Hi,
I ran into an issue this week during the nf...@ietf.org's testing event.
UFS - supports VOP_ALLOCATE() by using vop_stdallocate().
ZFS - just return EINVAL for VOP_ALLOCATE().
An NFSv4.2 server can either support Allocate or not, but it has to be
for all exported file systems.
This lea
On dv., des. 13 2019, Rick Macklem wrote:
Hi,
r355677 is a large patch that adds NFSv4.2 support to the NFS
client/server.
It has survived a "make universe" for all arches that would
build (some mips
and sparc64 failed for reasons unrelated to this patch).
However, I have not be
Hi,
r355677 is a large patch that adds NFSv4.2 support to the NFS client/server.
It has survived a "make universe" for all arches that would build (some mips
and sparc64 failed for reasons unrelated to this patch).
However, I have not been able to do a build with a recent GCC.
If there
Hi,
I have completed development and a testing cycle for the NFSv4.2 (RFC-7862)
code in base/projects/nfsv42 on subversion.
NFSv4.2 is a minor revision to NFSv4.1 and adds support for the following
optional
features:
- lseek(SEEK_DATA/SEEK_HOLE)
- posix_fallocate()
- posix_fadvise
Stefan Wendler wrote:
> We would like to use the file copy and the sparse features of 4.2 in our
> Setup. Do you know if any of the two has been implemented yet? The
> sparse feature would be more important than the file copy feature though.
No idea (except that NFSv4.2 isn't in
On 12/11/2017 13:15, Rick Macklem wrote:
> Stefan Wendler wrote:
>> I was wondering when and if FreeBSD will support NFSv4.2
>> Is there anything planned yet?
> Someday, but no specific plans at this point.
>
> Is there some specific feature in NFSv4.2 that you are look
Stefan Wendler wrote:
> I was wondering when and if FreeBSD will support NFSv4.2
> Is there anything planned yet?
Someday, but no specific plans at this point.
Is there some specific feature in NFSv4.2 that you are looking for?
I ask because there isn't a lot of new features in N
Hi,
I was wondering when and if FreeBSD will support NFSv4.2
Is there anything planned yet?
Thx and Cheers,
Stefan
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
16 matches
Mail list logo