On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 07:30:21PM -0500, Robert Watson wrote:
> uname extracts the various strings it can report from the running kernel
> using sysctl. Unless you have a faked uname, it will return the
The cluster has used a faked out uname(1) for a long time.
The problem turned out to be with
On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 09:58:05AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 04:35:20AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > The failures were caused by compiled utilities dumping core with sig11
> > or sig10 during compilation of the port. Toolchain people, please
> > look into this; the
On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 07:30:21PM -0500, Robert Watson wrote:
> uname extracts the various strings it can report from the running kernel
> using sysctl. Unless you have a faked uname, it will return the
> properties of the host non-chroot environment, rather than the chroot
> environment. Incre
On Sat, 9 Mar 2002, Will Andrews wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 10:00:10AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> > This isn't good:
> >
> > http://bento.freebsd.org/errorlogs/5-latest/TenDRA-4.1.2.log
> >
> > building TenDRA-4.1.2 on gohan17
> > in directory /x/tmp/5/chroot/31459
> > wit
On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 10:00:10AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> This isn't good:
>
> http://bento.freebsd.org/errorlogs/5-latest/TenDRA-4.1.2.log
>
> building TenDRA-4.1.2 on gohan17
> in directory /x/tmp/5/chroot/31459
> with arguments: TenDRA-4.1.2.tgz /usr/ports/lang/TenDRA
>
On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 10:00:10AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 04:35:20AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > http://bento.freebsd.org/errorlogs/5-latest/
>
> This isn't good:
>
> http://bento.freebsd.org/errorlogs/5-latest/TenDRA-4.1.2.log
>
> building TenDRA-4.1.2
On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 04:35:20AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> http://bento.freebsd.org/errorlogs/5-latest/
This isn't good:
http://bento.freebsd.org/errorlogs/5-latest/TenDRA-4.1.2.log
building TenDRA-4.1.2 on gohan17
in directory /x/tmp/5/chroot/31459
with arguments: TenDRA-4.
On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 04:35:20AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> The failures were caused by compiled utilities dumping core with sig11
> or sig10 during compilation of the port. Toolchain people, please
> look into this; the error logs are at
I am not sure we can say anything about the errors d
On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 04:35:20AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> I've uploaded a new set of packages to ftp-master for -current on
> i386; they should be picked up by the mirrors shortly. As I mentioned
> in a previous mail, there were compilation problems which caused a
> number of ports to fail
I've uploaded a new set of packages to ftp-master for -current on
i386; they should be picked up by the mirrors shortly. As I mentioned
in a previous mail, there were compilation problems which caused a
number of ports to fail, including qt2 and gnomelibs, meaning there
were no KDE or GNOME packa
10 matches
Mail list logo