Re: Newbusifying ed broke it

2000-08-27 Thread Alexander Langer
Thus spake Seigo Tanimura ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > - bus_space_write_1(sc->bst, sc->bsh, regno, data); > + bus_space_write_1(rman_get_bustag(sc->port_res), >rman_get_bushandle(sc->port_res), regno, data); Hmm. I used sc->bst/h to save function calls to rman_get_bus*, as many drivers use

Re: Newbusifying ed broke it

2000-08-17 Thread Peter Jeremy
On 2000-Aug-18 13:41:29 +0900, Seigo Tanimura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >The memory resource of the card might not be allocated properly. Could >you apply the following patch and report what your kernel print? ed0: conf_maddr = 0xcc000. ed0: tag(mem_res) = 1, handle(mem_res) = 0xc00cc000. ed0: f

Re: Newbusifying ed broke it

2000-08-17 Thread Seigo Tanimura
On Fri, 18 Aug 2000 09:56:56 +1000, Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: Peter> On 2000-Aug-17 16:55:57 +0900, Seigo Tanimura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Thu, 17 Aug 2000 15:35:59 +1000, >> Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >> >> peter.jeremy> Still not working. It now reports: >

Re: Newbusifying ed broke it

2000-08-17 Thread Peter Jeremy
On 2000-Aug-17 16:55:57 +0900, Seigo Tanimura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Thu, 17 Aug 2000 15:35:59 +1000, > Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > >peter.jeremy> Still not working. It now reports: >peter.jeremy> ed0: failed to clear shared memory at 0 - check configuration > >The probe rou

Re: Newbusifying ed broke it

2000-08-17 Thread Seigo Tanimura
On Thu, 17 Aug 2000 15:35:59 +1000, Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: peter.jeremy> Still not working. It now reports: peter.jeremy> ed0: failed to clear shared memory at 0 - check configuration The probe routine cleared and tested IO port instead of memory. Does the following patch work

Re: Newbusifying ed broke it

2000-08-16 Thread Peter Jeremy
On 2000-Aug-17 12:46:39 +0900, Seigo Tanimura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >peter.jeremy> a verbose boot shows: >peter.jeremy> ed0: failed to clear shared memory at cc000 - check configuration >peter.jeremy> ed0 failed to probe at port 0x300-0x31f iomem 0xcc000-0xc irq 7 on >isa0 > >Newbusifica

Re: Newbusifying ed broke it

2000-08-16 Thread Takahashi Yoshihiro
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Seigo Tanimura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Newbusification in the last commit was not done completely because > resource tags and handles were not used proplerly. Could you please > apply the following patch and see if your card works? I think this patch still h

Re: Newbusifying ed broke it

2000-08-16 Thread Seigo Tanimura
On Thu, 17 Aug 2000 11:13:25 +1000, Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: peter.jeremy> I have an SMC8016 NIC which should probe as: peter.jeremy> ed0 at port 0x300-0x31f iomem 0xcc000-0xc irq 7 on isa0 peter.jeremy> ed0: address 00:00:c0:57:99:47, type WD8013EPC (16 bit) peter.jeremy> A

Newbusifying ed broke it

2000-08-16 Thread Peter Jeremy
I have an SMC8016 NIC which should probe as: ed0 at port 0x300-0x31f iomem 0xcc000-0xc irq 7 on isa0 ed0: address 00:00:c0:57:99:47, type WD8013EPC (16 bit) After the following commit: >tanimura2000/08/13 21:31:11 PDT > > Modified files: >sys/dev/ed if_ed.c if_ed_pccard.c