Re: OpenSSL docs for FAQ

2000-01-26 Thread Keith Ward
Only recommendation I might pass on is being consistant in the use of "USA" instead of "US". The document starts off with references to "USA" and then changes to "US". Following the custom used in current crypto source (i.e. "USA_RESIDENT" in make.conf) I would suggest using "USA". Keith Acco

Re: OpenSSL docs for FAQ

2000-01-25 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Tue, 25 Jan 2000, Nik Clayton wrote: > Is this FAQ material, or better off in the installation section of the > Handbook? I'd veer towards the Handbook myself. Seemed like a potential Frequently Asked Question to me, is all. I defer to your superior knowledge of our documentation standards :

Re: OpenSSL docs for FAQ

2000-01-25 Thread Nik Clayton
On Tue, Jan 25, 2000 at 12:49:04AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > Can people please review this for style and content, for inclusion in > the FAQ? I'll also need someone to mark it up once it's ready since SGML > is currently not among my abilities :-) Is this FAQ material, or better off in the in

OpenSSL docs for FAQ

2000-01-25 Thread Kris Kennaway
Can people please review this for style and content, for inclusion in the FAQ? I'll also need someone to mark it up once it's ready since SGML is currently not among my abilities :-) Thanks, Kris As of FreeBSD 4.0, the OpenSSL toolkit is a part of the base system. OpenSSL [http://www.openss