Re: Optimisation patch

2000-03-24 Thread Bruce Evans
On Thu, 23 Mar 2000, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Fri, 24 Mar 2000, Bruce Evans wrote: Yes. make.conf shouldn't even hint that globally changing CFLAGS is supported or good. Note that the suggested "most common use" has been bogus since -pipe was added to the default settings in rev.1.31

Re: Optimisation patch

2000-03-24 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Fri, 24 Mar 2000, Bruce Evans wrote: Hmm. What is the correct way of compiling world with optimisation or other compiler settings? `make world'. Optimization is in the default settings (-O). Fair enough - but how about platform-specific code generation settings, e.g. -march=pentium?

Re: Optimisation patch

2000-03-24 Thread Brad Knowles
At 4:29 PM -0800 2000/3/24, Kris Kennaway wrote: `make world'. Optimization is in the default settings (-O). Fair enough - but how about platform-specific code generation settings, e.g. -march=pentium? Whatever the official position is, it should be documented in

Re: Optimisation patch

2000-03-24 Thread Brad Knowles
At 5:14 PM -0800 2000/3/24, Kris Kennaway wrote: Err, this thread started with a patch to do that, which is what we're currently discussing. Understood. I just didn't want to lose sight of the real goal of the proposed patch, and what led up to the proposed patch. -- These are

Optimisation patch

2000-03-23 Thread Kris Kennaway
Any objections to the following? Index: make.conf === RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/etc/defaults/make.conf,v retrieving revision 1.101 diff -u -u -r1.101 make.conf --- make.conf 2000/03/22 00:49:20 1.101 +++ make.conf 2000/03/23

Re: Optimisation patch

2000-03-23 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Thu, 23 Mar 2000, Chuck Robey wrote: On Thu, 23 Mar 2000, Kris Kennaway wrote: Any objections to the following? I don't mind at all ... I was wondering about just taking out the ability to even USE -O2 in the compiler, but there're probably *some* non-kernel related reasons for

Re: Optimisation patch

2000-03-23 Thread Russell L. Carter
Hi folks, %On Thu, 23 Mar 2000, Kris Kennaway wrote: % % Any objections to the following? % %I don't mind at all ... I was wondering about just taking out the ability %to even USE -O2 in the compiler, but there're probably *some* non-kernel %related reasons for using it, and we shouldn't block

Re: Optimisation patch

2000-03-23 Thread Bruce Evans
On Thu, 23 Mar 2000, Kris Kennaway wrote: Any objections to the following? Index: make.conf === RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/etc/defaults/make.conf,v retrieving revision 1.101 diff -u -u -r1.101 make.conf --- make.conf

Re: Optimisation patch

2000-03-23 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Fri, 24 Mar 2000, Bruce Evans wrote: Yes. make.conf shouldn't even hint that globally changing CFLAGS is supported or good. Note that the suggested "most common use" has been bogus since -pipe was added to the default settings in rev.1.31 (1998/05/01) of sys.mk. Hmm. What is the