On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 11:06:34AM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 12:41:31PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 10:16:44PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> > > On 2013-Dec-22 11:53:17 -0800, Darren Pilgrim
> > > wrote:
> > > >Because of that deinstall lo
On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 12:41:31PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 10:16:44PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> > On 2013-Dec-22 11:53:17 -0800, Darren Pilgrim
> > wrote:
> > >Because of that deinstall log. When you use `pkg install` to upgrade a
> > >port, you get somethi
On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 10:16:44PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On 2013-Dec-22 11:53:17 -0800, Darren Pilgrim
> wrote:
> >Because of that deinstall log. When you use `pkg install` to upgrade a
> >port, you get something like this:
> >
> >Jul 10 23:06:40 chombo pkg-static: ca_root_nss-3.15.1 ins
On 2013-Dec-22 11:53:17 -0800, Darren Pilgrim
wrote:
>Because of that deinstall log. When you use `pkg install` to upgrade a
>port, you get something like this:
>
>Jul 10 23:06:40 chombo pkg-static: ca_root_nss-3.15.1 installed
>Nov 29 15:04:52 chombo pkg: ca_root_nss reinstalled: 3.15.2_1
>
>T
On 12/22/2013 6:00 AM, Frank Seltzer wrote:
Adrian Chadd said:
The point is that some people like an audit trail. The audit trail for
some people involves remote logging of syslog messages to a log host.
This would include when packages are installed.
There are two more:
1. When a port was de
figuration file
Glen Barber replied:
echo 'SYSLOG: no' >> /usr/local/etc/pkg.conf
And Shane Ambler:
now we can turn it off which I don't think we could before.
All of this is mostly off-topic. I haven't had any opposition to logging.
Instead, I originally thought that th
On Sun, 22 Dec 2013 15:48:49 +0400, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> Steve,
>
> On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 12:14:03PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: S> It did
> not ask how to stop this stupidity. I asked to have S> this stupidity
> stopped by default. The spewing of this S> information in
> /var/log/messages pr
On Sun, 22 Dec 2013, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 09:00:42AM -0500, Frank Seltzer wrote:
/root # man pkg.conf
No manual entry for pkg.conf
pkg.conf man pages comes with pkg itself, just bootstrap it and you will get the
manpage :)
regards,
Bapt
OK, my bad, I did this
On Sat, 2013-12-21 at 15:25 -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 12:16:00AM +0100, Julien Laffaye wrote:
> > On 12/22/2013 12:04 AM, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > > On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 11:14:39PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > >> this has been done and activated for reason, first
On 22/12/2013 16:08, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 22/12/2013 14:55, olli hauer wrote:
>> What I agree is having it would be nice to have dedicated syslog
>> (like yum.log) instead /var/log/messages since this is already
>> spammed by most every process.
>
> Add something like this to /etc/syslog.con
On 22/12/2013 14:55, olli hauer wrote:
> What I agree is having it would be nice to have dedicated syslog
> (like yum.log) instead /var/log/messages since this is already
> spammed by most every process.
Add something like this to /etc/syslog.conf:
!pkg
*.* /var/log/pkg.log
C
On 2013-12-22 15:00, Frank Seltzer wrote:
>
> On Sat, 21 Dec 2013, Steve Kargl wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 07:35:56PM +0100, d...@gmx.com wrote:
>>> I've just installed a very recent -CURRENT, and now I'm performing a big
>>> portupgrade procedure. I get the following message spammed a l
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 09:00:42AM -0500, Frank Seltzer wrote:
>
> On Sat, 21 Dec 2013, Steve Kargl wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 07:35:56PM +0100, d...@gmx.com wrote:
> >> I've just installed a very recent -CURRENT, and now I'm performing a
> >> big portupgrade procedure. I get the follo
On Sat, 21 Dec 2013, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 07:35:56PM +0100, d...@gmx.com wrote:
I've just installed a very recent -CURRENT, and now I'm performing a
big portupgrade procedure. I get the following message spammed a lot:
pkg: PACKAGESITE in pkg.conf is deprecated. Please
Steve,
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 12:14:03PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
S> It did not ask how to stop this stupidity. I asked to have
S> this stupidity stopped by default. The spewing of this
S> information in /var/log/messages provides NOTHING. Please
S> turn it off by default.
I am really sup
The point is that some people like an audit trail. The audit trail for
some people involves remote logging of syslog messages to a log host.
This would include when packages are installed.
-adrian
On 21 December 2013 15:49, Steve Kargl
wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 06:47:01PM -0500, Glen Ba
On 22/12/2013 09:34, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 11:14:39PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>>
>> this has been done and activated for reason, first for lot of companies,
>
> companies can turn it on it they want it.
Generally the more secure option is default, you can turn off
I was surprised initially, but haven't thought about it much since.
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/PACKAGESITE-spam-tp5870583p5870666.html
Sent from the freebsd-current mailing list archive at Nabbl
In article <20131221230448.ga61...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>,
Steve Kargl writes:
>Other than the noise in /var/log/message, what does this provide
>that 'pkg info' doesn't!
A record of when packages were installed and removed.
-GAWollman
___
free
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 03:49:26PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> /var/log/message never gets corrupted?
>
If a machine is compromised, I can review log from remote syslog server.
It is impossible to trust the package information, relying on the local
database alone.
Glen
pgpklyEF3RMKl.pgp
Descr
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 03:44:11PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 06:29:17PM -0500, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> > In article <20131221230448.ga61...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>,
> > Steve Kargl writes:
> >
> > >Other than the noise in /var/log/message, what does this provide
>
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 06:47:01PM -0500, Glen Barber wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 03:44:11PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 06:29:17PM -0500, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> > > In article <20131221230448.ga61...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>,
> > > Steve Kargl writes:
> > >
>
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 03:44:11PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 06:29:17PM -0500, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> > In article <20131221230448.ga61...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>,
> > Steve Kargl writes:
> >
> > >Other than the noise in /var/log/message, what does this provide
>
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 06:29:17PM -0500, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> In article <20131221230448.ga61...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>,
> Steve Kargl writes:
>
> >Other than the noise in /var/log/message, what does this provide
> >that 'pkg info' doesn't!
>
> A record of when packages were installed
On 22/12/13 00:04, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 11:14:39PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>>
>
> Other than the noise in /var/log/message, what does this provide
> that 'pkg info' doesn't! Please turn of this feature by default.
>
No please don't, it's a very useful feature, y
On 12/22/2013 12:25 AM, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 12:16:00AM +0100, Julien Laffaye wrote:
On 12/22/2013 12:04 AM, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 11:14:39PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
this has been done and activated for reason, first for lot of companies,
co
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 12:16:00AM +0100, Julien Laffaye wrote:
> On 12/22/2013 12:04 AM, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 11:14:39PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> >> this has been done and activated for reason, first for lot of companies,
> > companies can turn it on it they wan
On 12/22/2013 12:04 AM, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 11:14:39PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
this has been done and activated for reason, first for lot of companies,
companies can turn it on it they want it.
And if you want to save the few extra kB, you can turn it off...
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 11:14:39PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>
> this has been done and activated for reason, first for lot of companies,
companies can turn it on it they want it.
> secondly I receive tons of request to actiavte on by default while
> you are the first to request it off by
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 01:39:59PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 01:24:55PM -0800, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
> > On 12/21/2013 1:05 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > > On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 02:54:39PM -0600, Greg Rivers wrote:
> > >> On Sat, 21 Dec 2013, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > >>
> > >
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 01:24:55PM -0800, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
> On 12/21/2013 1:05 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 02:54:39PM -0600, Greg Rivers wrote:
> >> On Sat, 21 Dec 2013, Steve Kargl wrote:
> >>
> >>> It did not ask how to stop this stupidity. I asked to have this
> >>>
On 12/21/2013 1:05 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 02:54:39PM -0600, Greg Rivers wrote:
On Sat, 21 Dec 2013, Steve Kargl wrote:
It did not ask how to stop this stupidity. I asked to have this
stupidity stopped by default. The spewing of this information in
/var/log/messages pr
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 02:54:39PM -0600, Greg Rivers wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Dec 2013, Steve Kargl wrote:
>
> > It did not ask how to stop this stupidity. I asked to have this
> > stupidity stopped by default. The spewing of this information in
> > /var/log/messages provides NOTHING. Please turn
On Sat, 21 Dec 2013, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 03:10:26PM -0500, Glen Barber wrote:
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 12:05:38PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 07:35:56PM +0100, d...@gmx.com wrote:
I've just installed a very recent -CURRENT, and now I'm performing a
On 12/21/2013 9:14 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 03:10:26PM -0500, Glen Barber wrote:
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 12:05:38PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 07:35:56PM +0100, d...@gmx.com wrote:
I've just installed a very recent -CURRENT, and now I'm performing a
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 03:10:26PM -0500, Glen Barber wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 12:05:38PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 07:35:56PM +0100, d...@gmx.com wrote:
> > > I've just installed a very recent -CURRENT, and now I'm performing a big
> > > portupgrade procedure.
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 12:05:38PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 07:35:56PM +0100, d...@gmx.com wrote:
> > I've just installed a very recent -CURRENT, and now I'm performing a big
> > portupgrade procedure. I get the following message spammed a lot:
> >
> > pkg: PACKAGESITE
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 07:35:56PM +0100, d...@gmx.com wrote:
> I've just installed a very recent -CURRENT, and now I'm performing a big
> portupgrade procedure. I get the following message spammed a lot:
>
> pkg: PACKAGESITE in pkg.conf is deprecated. Please create a repository
> configuration
I've just installed a very recent -CURRENT, and now I'm performing a big
portupgrade procedure. I get the following message spammed a lot:
pkg: PACKAGESITE in pkg.conf is deprecated. Please create a repository
configuration file
___
freebsd-current@fr
39 matches
Mail list logo
