Re: Panic: Page Fault in Kernel: Yesterday's CURRENT

t; >> >> Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode >> cpuid = 0; apic id = 20 >> fault virtual address   = 0x0 >> fault code  = supervisor write data, page not present >> instruction pointer = 0x20:0xffffffff804e0db4 >> stack pointer  

Re: Panic: Page Fault in Kernel: Yesterday's CURRENT

ite data, page not present >> instruction pointer = 0x20:0x804e0db4 >> stack pointer   = 0x0:0xfe0434de4e10 >> frame pointer   = 0x0:0xfe0434de4e70 >> code segment    = base 0x0, limit 0xf, type 0x1b >>    

Re: Panic: Page Fault in Kernel: Yesterday's CURRENT

pic id = 20 >> fault virtual address   = 0x0 >> fault code  = supervisor write data, page not present >> instruction pointer = 0x20:0x804e0db4 >> stack pointer   = 0x0:0xfe0434de4e10 >> frame pointer   = 0x0:0xfe0434de4e70 >>

Re: Panic: Page Fault in Kernel: Yesterday's CURRENT

0:0xfe0434de4e70 > >> code segment    = base 0x0, limit 0xf, type 0x1b > >>     = DPL 0, pres 1, long 1, def32 0, gran 1 > >> processor eflags    = resume, IOPL = 0 > >> current process = 82990 (c++) > >

Re: Panic: Page Fault in Kernel: Yesterday's CURRENT

code segment    = base 0x0, limit 0xf, type 0x1b     = DPL 0, pres 1, long 1, def32 0, gran 1 processor eflags    = resume, IOPL = 0 current process = 82990 (c++) trap number = 12 panic: page fault cpuid = 0 time = 163998 KDB: stack backtrac

Re: Panic: Page Fault in Kernel: Yesterday's CURRENT

type 0x1b     = DPL 0, pres 1, long 1, def32 0, gran 1 processor eflags    = resume, IOPL = 0 current process = 82990 (c++) trap number = 12 panic: page fault cpuid = 0 time = 163998 KDB: stack backtrace: #0 0x8050fc95 at kdb_backtrace+0x

Re: Panic: Page Fault in Kernel: Yesterday's CURRENT

res 1, long 1, def32 0, gran 1 processor eflags    = resume, IOPL = 0 current process = 82990 (c++) trap number = 12 panic: page fault cpuid = 0 time = 163998 KDB: stack backtrace: #0 0x8050fc95 at kdb_backtrace+0x65 #1 0x804c468f at vpanic+0x1

Re: Panic: Page Fault in Kernel: Yesterday's CURRENT

ointer   = 0x0:0xfe0434de4e10 > frame pointer   = 0x0:0xfe0434de4e70 > code segment    = base 0x0, limit 0xf, type 0x1b >     = DPL 0, pres 1, long 1, def32 0, gran 1 > processor eflags    = resume, IOPL = 0 > current process     = 82

Panic: Page Fault in Kernel: Yesterday's CURRENT

= 0x0:0xfe0434de4e70 code segment= base 0x0, limit 0xf, type 0x1b = DPL 0, pres 1, long 1, def32 0, gran 1 processor eflags= resume, IOPL = 0 current process = 82990 (c++) trap number = 12 panic: page fault cpuid = 0 time

Re: "panic: page fault" in iwn signal handler(?) at r367127

segment  = base 0x0, limit 0xf, type 0x1b >    = DPL 0, pres 1, long 1, def32 0, gran 1 > processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 > current process  = 12 (irq36: iwn0) > trap number  = 12 > panic: page fault > cpuid = 4 > time = 1604056852 >

Re: "panic: page fault" in iwn signal handler(?) at r367127

segment  = base 0x0, limit 0xf, type 0x1b >    = DPL 0, pres 1, long 1, def32 0, gran 1 > processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 > current process  = 12 (irq36: iwn0) > trap number  = 12 > panic: page fault > cpuid = 4 > time = 1604056852 >

"panic: page fault" in iwn signal handler(?) at r367127

pt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 current process = 12 (irq36: iwn0) trap number = 12 panic: page fault cpuid = 4 time = 1604056852 KDB: stack backtrace: db_trace_self_wrapper() at 0x804a69db = db_trace_self_wrapper+0x2b/frame 0x8241d3f0 vpanic() at 0x80baf802 = vpanic+0

Re: panic: page fault head/amd64 @r361830

On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 06:41:27AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote: > My build machine had no issues with the upgrade from r361784 to r361830, > but my laptop panicked during the transition from single- to multi-user > mode, just after bpf was attached. > . Thanks to Hans Petter Selasky (who aske

Re: panic: page fault head/amd64 @r361830

ags= interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 current process = 0 (iwn0 net80211 taskq) trap number = 12 panic: page fault cpuid = 3 time = 1591362374 KDB: stack backtrace: db_trace_self_wrapper() at 0x804a4afb = db_trace_self_wrapper+0x2b/frame 0xfe0fc08c37b0 vpanic

panic: page fault head/amd64 @r361830

0 current process = 0 (iwn0 net80211 taskq) trap number = 12 panic: page fault cpuid = 3 time = 1591362374 KDB: stack backtrace: db_trace_self_wrapper() at 0x804a4afb = db_trace_self_wrapper+0x2b/frame 0xfe0fc08c37b0 vpanic() at 0x80b93452 = vpanic+0x182/fra

panic: page fault (on 10.0-RELEASE-p7)

Info at . On the 1st boot after the panic, the crash dump failed due to insufficient amount of space on /. Then I removed some files, restarted the system, and the dump was redone. Is it correct to assume that the dump was not damaged? __

Re: panic: page fault

ointer = 0x28:0xff823025b6c0 > > code segment= base 0x0, limit 0xf, type 0x1b > > > > = DPL 0, pres 1, long 1, def32 0, gran 1 > > > > processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 > >

Re: panic: page fault

p number = 12 panic: page fault #6 0x80bb5e53 in calltrap () at /usr/src/sys/amd64/amd64/exception.S:228 #7 0x80933e07 in m_copym (m=0x0, off0=1500, len=1480, wait=1) at /usr/src/sys/kern/uipc_mbuf.c:542 #8 0x809f8b76 in ip_fragment (ip=0xfe004b2f3980,

panic: page fault

http://privatepaste.com/147286442b ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: PANIC: PAGE FAULT

t 0xf, type 0x1b > = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran1 > processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 > current process = 80 (sh) > trap number = 12 > panic: page fault > > syncing disks, buffers remaining... 184 184 184 18

PANIC: PAGE FAULT

rrent process = 80 (sh) trap number = 12 panic: page fault syncing disks, buffers remaining... 184 184 184 184 184 184 184 184 184 184 184 184 184 184 giving up on 148 buffers Uptime: 16s Terminate ACPI PLEASE HE

Re: 5.2-BETA panic: page fault

On 1 Dec, Stefan Ehmann wrote: > On Mon, 2003-12-01 at 01:10, Don Lewis wrote: >> Can you reproduce this problem without bktr? >> > >> You are getting a double panic, with the second happening during the >> file system sync. The code seems to be be tripping over the same mount >> list entry eac

Re: 5.2-BETA panic: page fault

On 1 Dec, Stefan Ehmann wrote: > On Mon, 2003-12-01 at 01:10, Don Lewis wrote: >> Can you reproduce this problem without bktr? >> > >> You are getting a double panic, with the second happening during the >> file system sync. The code seems to be be tripping over the same mount >> list entry eac

Re: 5.2-BETA panic: page fault

On Mon, 2003-12-01 at 01:10, Don Lewis wrote: > Can you reproduce this problem without bktr? > > You are getting a double panic, with the second happening during the > file system sync. The code seems to be be tripping over the same mount > list entry each time. Maybe the mount list is getting

Re: 5.2-BETA panic: page fault

Can you reproduce this problem without bktr? > #6 0xc06743d8 in calltrap () at {standard input}:94 > #7 0xc0505b53 in _mtx_lock_flags (m=0x0, opts=0, > file=0xc06bfc1d "/usr/src/sys/kern/kern_lock.c", line=228) > at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_mutex.c:214 > #8 0xc0502b54 in lockmgr (lkp=0xc

Re: 5.2-BETA panic: page fault

On 30 Nov, Stefan Ehmann wrote: > On Sun, 2003-11-30 at 11:13, Stefan Ehmann wrote: >> This happens to me several times a day (cvsup from yesterday didn't >> change anything). The panic message is always the same, the backtrace is >> different though (but always seems to be file system related in s

Re: 5.2-BETA panic: page fault

On Sun, 2003-11-30 at 11:13, Stefan Ehmann wrote: > This happens to me several times a day (cvsup from yesterday didn't > change anything). The panic message is always the same, the backtrace is > different though (but always seems to be file system related in some > way) > > Here's one from today

5.2-BETA panic: page fault

uot; for details. This GDB was configured as "i386-undermydesk-freebsd"... panic: page fault panic messages: --- Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode fault virtual address = 0x0 fault code = supervisor read, page not present instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc0505b53 s

panic: page fault (using ppp ipv6cp)

Hello, I upgraded my machine to CURRENT of today. It was paniced at while the ppp process was making the IPv6 tunnel. When I rebooted it several times, the problem occurred in the same place (currnet process = ppp). Now I'm using an older kernel(cvsuped October 2). This older kernel works fine. M

IPv6 panic page fault nd6_cache_lladdr/nd6_ns_input

software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions. Type "show copying" to see the conditions. There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details. This GDB was config

Re: panic: page fault on FreeBSD 5.1 -RELEASE

= base 0x0, limit 0xf, type 0x1b > = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 > Processor eflags = interupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 > Current process = 29 (irq9: ahc0 ips0) > Trap number = 12 > > Panic = page fault > > Did I do something

kernel panic: page fault while in kernel mode

t virtual address = 0x19c fault cool supervisor read, page not present IP 0x8: 0xc01b5e5e SP 0x10: 0xca75eed4 FP 0x10: 0xca75eee0 CS base: 0x0, limit 0xf type 0x1b DPL 0, press 1, def32 1, gran 1 proc eflags resume,IOPL = 0 current process 45372 (make) trap number = 12 panic page fault

Re: panic: page fault (apparently caused by mount_mfs)

Yep! The patch seems to have fixed the problem! :-) Thanks Luoqi!! Bob On Mon, May 17, 1999 at 11:42:21PM -0400, Luoqi Chen wrote: > > I have been making world each time after cvsupping so I would expect the > > mfs kld module to be getting rebuilt and it appears to be up-to-date: > > > > -r

Re: panic: page fault (apparently caused by mount_mfs)

> > processor eflags= interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 > > current process = 40 (mount_mfs) > > interrupt mask = > > trap number = 12 > > panic: page fault > > > > > > Any ideas on what m

Re: panic: page fault (apparently caused by mount_mfs)

On Mon, May 17, 1999 at 01:47:59PM -0700, Matthew Jacob wrote: > > > > > > I use mfs a lot and have had no trouble whatsoever. I'm using: > > > > > > swap/tmpmfs rw,-s=200 0 > > > > > > Do you suppose that the usage of /dev/da0s1b directly is wha

Re: panic: page fault (apparently caused by mount_mfs)

> > > > I use mfs a lot and have had no trouble whatsoever. I'm using: > > > > swap/tmpmfs rw,-s=200 0 > > > > Do you suppose that the usage of /dev/da0s1b directly is what's causing > > some trouble? > > Unfortunately, changing from /dev/da0s1b

Re: panic: page fault (apparently caused by mount_mfs)

= 0x10:0xc98adb0 > > code segment= base 0x0, limit 0xf, type 0x1b > > = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 > > processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 > > current process = 4

Re: panic: page fault (apparently caused by mount_mfs)

egment = base 0x0, limit 0xf, type 0x1b > = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 > processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 > current process = 40 (mount_mfs) > interrupt mask = > trap

Re: panic: page fault (apparently caused by mount_mfs)

On Mon, May 17, 1999 at 01:03:50PM -0700, Matthew Jacob wrote: > > I use mfs a lot and have had no trouble whatsoever. I'm using: > > swap/tmpmfs rw,-s=200 0 > > Do you suppose that the usage of /dev/da0s1b directly is what's causing > some troub

Re: panic: page fault (apparently caused by mount_mfs)

mit 0xf, type 0x1b > = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 > processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 > current process = 40 (mount_mfs) > interrupt mask = > trap number

panic: page fault (apparently caused by mount_mfs)

, def32 1, gran 1 processor eflags= interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 current process = 40 (mount_mfs) interrupt mask = trap number = 12 panic: page fault Any ideas on what may be wrong? Thanks, Bob -- Bob Willcox

New socket code hits again! (was: Latest VM changes cause panic: page fault)

On Sun, Jan 31, 1999 at 02:27:17PM +0300, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: > Pre-new-VM kernel not cause page fault Sorry for false alarm - it seems that new socket code hits again and not new VM: #4 0xf019cc3e in trap () #5 0xf013aa20 in soclose () #6 0xf01314e2 in soo_close () #7 0xf011c456 in clo

Latest VM changes cause panic: page fault

It happens with plain UFS, I have no NFS. Pre-new-VM kernel not cause page fault -- Andrey A. Chernov a...@null.net MTH/SH/HE S-- W-- N+ PEC>+ D A a++ C G>+ QH+(++) 666+>++ Y To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message