This works, thanks! :-) :-)
Domo Arrigato!
M
> I'm not sure, but my thought was something like following patches.
>
> Thanks
>
> Index: dev/acpica/acpi.c
> ===
> RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/dev/acpica/acpi.c,v
> retrieving revis
÷ Wed, 02.10.2002, × 11:31, Mark Murray ÎÁÐÉÓÁÌ:
> > I noticed both of yours and the other "me too" reply indicated ACPI was in
> > use. Is the behavior different when acpi is disabled?
>
> Yeah. Booting fails completely. Hard hang after probing the parallel port.
Just notice same problem on 4
On 03-Oct-2002 Mitsuru IWASAKI wrote:
>> ># I could be wrong, please correct me :)
>> >I think that Libretto 110CT doesn't have PCI-ISA bridge , so no isab,
>> >no isa, no isahint (requires isa) w/ acpi enabled.
>>
>> Hmmm, \_SB.PCI0.EIO has no _ADR, _HID instead.
>> But I think ISA or LPC contr
> ># I could be wrong, please correct me :)
> >I think that Libretto 110CT doesn't have PCI-ISA bridge , so no isab,
> >no isa, no isahint (requires isa) w/ acpi enabled.
>
> Hmmm, \_SB.PCI0.EIO has no _ADR, _HID instead.
> But I think ISA or LPC controller exists in this system.
Adding some dev
> > Here is my hints file (which has not changed in at least 6 months)
>
> Ok, so you only have ata0 and no ata1. So that means the ACPI ata
> attachment almost worked. Humm, try doing a hack to change ATA_IOADDR_RID
> in ata-all.h from 0 to 1 along with the previous patch to add an acpi
> atta
After a cvsup and buildworld/kernel, everything seems to be working again.
Thanks!
On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 08:41:10AM +0900, Mitsuru IWASAKI wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > On 01-Oct-2002 Michael McGoldrick wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 12:48:47PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On 01-Oct-2
On 02-Oct-2002 Mark Murray wrote:
>> > Ok, so you only have ata0 and no ata1. So that means the ACPI ata
>> > attachment almost worked. Humm, try doing a hack to change ATA_IOADDR_RID
>> > in ata-all.h from 0 to 1 along with the previous patch to add an acpi
>> > attachment for ata and see if t
> > Ok, so you only have ata0 and no ata1. So that means the ACPI ata
> > attachment almost worked. Humm, try doing a hack to change ATA_IOADDR_RID
> > in ata-all.h from 0 to 1 along with the previous patch to add an acpi
> > attachment for ata and see if that works. I still have no idea why
>
> >> So it doesn't boot at all, that's different from "hard-hang during reboot".
> >> :) After ppc your device probe is over. You could be getting an
> >> interrupt storm. Can you break into ddb when this happens?
> >
> > Roger the diference. :-)
> >
> > No. I cannot break into DDB. The keyb
On 02-Oct-2002 Mark Murray wrote:
>> > "Hard hang" means that the probe messages stop around the parallel
>> > device, and nothing else happens. The PCCARD ethernet remains dead.
>> > the disk is silent and no amount of keyboard activity does anything
>> > at all. Serial console dead. Reset neede
> > "Hard hang" means that the probe messages stop around the parallel
> > device, and nothing else happens. The PCCARD ethernet remains dead.
> > the disk is silent and no amount of keyboard activity does anything
> > at all. Serial console dead. Reset needed to reboot.
>
> So it doesn't boot at
On 02-Oct-2002 Mark Murray wrote:
>> > Iwasaki-San's patch made no difference that I could see. Disabling ACPI
>> > causes my system to hard-hang during reboot. I might be able to fix that
>> > by futzing with device.hints, but that took me a whole weekend and a
>> > reinstall last time I tried.
> > Iwasaki-San's patch made no difference that I could see. Disabling ACPI
> > causes my system to hard-hang during reboot. I might be able to fix that
> > by futzing with device.hints, but that took me a whole weekend and a
> > reinstall last time I tried. Device.hints is a dangerous thing to pl
On 02-Oct-2002 Mark Murray wrote:
>> > I tried this patch, and it made some progress (dmesg included). The
>> > ATA system still seems badly broken, there is a spurious mention of
>> > some kerneldump. I also have no console.
>>
>> Hmm, ata0 may be getting the wrong resources. Hmm. Try iwasaki
> > Hmm, ata0 may be getting the wrong resources. Hmm. Try iwasaki-san's
> > patch to acpi_pcib_* instead and see if it that helps. Either that or
> > turn off ACPI for the time being.
>
> Iwasaki-San's patch made no difference that I could see. Disabling ACPI
> causes my system to hard-hang d
> > I tried this patch, and it made some progress (dmesg included). The
> > ATA system still seems badly broken, there is a spurious mention of
> > some kerneldump. I also have no console.
>
> Hmm, ata0 may be getting the wrong resources. Hmm. Try iwasaki-san's
> patch to acpi_pcib_* instead an
On 02-Oct-2002 Mark Murray wrote:
> Hi
>
> I tried this patch, and it made some progress (dmesg included). The
> ATA system still seems badly broken, there is a spurious mention of
> some kerneldump. I also have no console.
Hmm, ata0 may be getting the wrong resources. Hmm. Try iwasaki-san's
Hi
I tried this patch, and it made some progress (dmesg included). The
ATA system still seems badly broken, there is a spurious mention of
some kerneldump. I also have no console.
Perhaps the legacy stuff needs to be backed out or disabled pending fixing?
M
Copyright (c) 1992-2002 The FreeBSD
On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 05:23:34PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> On 01-Oct-2002 Michael McGoldrick wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 12:48:47PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> >>
> >> On 01-Oct-2002 Michael McGoldrick wrote:
> >> > 'Me too'
> >> > Dmesg from working kernel attached, not sure how
> On Tue, 1 Oct 2002, Mark Murray wrote:
> > I'm running a kernel with your very latest nexus.c 1.49.
> >
> > The problem of the disappearing HD has not been fixed by this.
> >
> > Enclosed are verbose mesg's, one from a three-hour-ago
> > (1st Oct 2002, 11:00 am, BST) kernel (broken), and anoth
On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 08:41:10AM +0900, Mitsuru IWASAKI wrote:
> Hi,
>
[...]
> > Can you try with the stuff I committed yesterday? It fixed the case (for
> > my tests at least) of legacy0 failing to attach or probe when acpi failed
> > to attach.
>
> If still failed, please try this.
> I've
On 01-Oct-2002 Mitsuru IWASAKI wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> On 01-Oct-2002 Michael McGoldrick wrote:
>> > On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 12:48:47PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On 01-Oct-2002 Michael McGoldrick wrote:
>> >> > 'Me too'
>> >> > Dmesg from working kernel attached, not sure how to get a dm
Hi,
> On 01-Oct-2002 Michael McGoldrick wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 12:48:47PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> >>
> >> On 01-Oct-2002 Michael McGoldrick wrote:
> >> > 'Me too'
> >> > Dmesg from working kernel attached, not sure how to get a dmesg from the
> >> > broken one. :(
> >> > Send me
On 01-Oct-2002 Michael McGoldrick wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 12:48:47PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
>>
>> On 01-Oct-2002 Michael McGoldrick wrote:
>> > 'Me too'
>> > Dmesg from working kernel attached, not sure how to get a dmesg from the
>> > broken one. :(
>> > Send me a mail if any furth
On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 12:48:47PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> On 01-Oct-2002 Michael McGoldrick wrote:
> > 'Me too'
> > Dmesg from working kernel attached, not sure how to get a dmesg from the
> > broken one. :(
> > Send me a mail if any further info would help.
> > (I have built two kernels
On Tue, 1 Oct 2002, Mark Murray wrote:
> I'm running a kernel with your very latest nexus.c 1.49.
>
> The problem of the disappearing HD has not been fixed by this.
>
> Enclosed are verbose mesg's, one from a three-hour-ago
> (1st Oct 2002, 11:00 am, BST) kernel (broken), and another
> from a wo
On 01-Oct-2002 Michael McGoldrick wrote:
> 'Me too'
> Dmesg from working kernel attached, not sure how to get a dmesg from the
> broken one. :(
> Send me a mail if any further info would help.
> (I have built two kernels recently, both have had this problem)
What exact problem do you have. No P
'Me too'
Dmesg from working kernel attached, not sure how to get a dmesg from the
broken one. :(
Send me a mail if any further info would help.
(I have built two kernels recently, both have had this problem)
On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 01:06:59PM +0100, Mark Murray wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm running a kern
On 01-Oct-2002 Mark Murray wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm running a kernel with your very latest nexus.c 1.49.
>
> The problem of the disappearing HD has not been fixed by this.
>
> Enclosed are verbose mesg's, one from a three-hour-ago
> (1st Oct 2002, 11:00 am, BST) kernel (broken), and another
> from
Hi
I'm running a kernel with your very latest nexus.c 1.49.
The problem of the disappearing HD has not been fixed by this.
Enclosed are verbose mesg's, one from a three-hour-ago
(1st Oct 2002, 11:00 am, BST) kernel (broken), and another
from a working Sept 22nd kernel.
M
--
o Mark Murra
30 matches
Mail list logo
