On 06/09/2012 16:51, Doug Barton wrote:
Ok, never mind the last one ... this patch I've actually tested. :)
Committed to HEAD and MFC'ed. Thanks everyone for the feedback and help.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
I have recently tried the PORTS_MODULES knob, and found a problem. The
ports tree searches for some dependencies by finding a binary in PATH,
and that fails since by default /usr/local/ isn't there. The attached
patch fixes that problem.
It would be more robust to use PREFIX there instead of
On 9 June 2012 18:15, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
I have recently tried the PORTS_MODULES knob, and found a problem. The
ports tree searches for some dependencies by finding a binary in PATH,
and that fails since by default /usr/local/ isn't there. The attached
patch fixes that
On 09/06/2012 18:26, Chris Rees wrote:
On 9 June 2012 18:15, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
I have recently tried the PORTS_MODULES knob, and found a problem. The
ports tree searches for some dependencies by finding a binary in PATH,
and that fails since by default /usr/local/ isn't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On 06/09/2012 10:40, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 09/06/2012 18:26, Chris Rees wrote:
On 9 June 2012 18:15, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
I have recently tried the PORTS_MODULES knob, and found a
problem. The ports tree searches for some
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On 06/09/2012 10:40, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 09/06/2012 18:26, Chris Rees wrote:
On 9 June 2012 18:15, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
I have recently tried the
Ok, after reading your PR and discussion on IRC I have the following
which incorporates all the suggestions so far. I haven't actually tested
this yet, but if people agree that this is the right direction to go I
will before I commit it of course.
Doug
--
It's always a long day;
Ok, never mind the last one ... this patch I've actually tested. :)
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
Index: kern.post.mk
===
--- kern.post.mk(revision 236818)
+++ kern.post.mk(working
On Jun 9, 2012, at 4:51 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
Ok, never mind the last one ... this patch I've actually tested. :)
This one looks good :) (and fixes the item I briefly mentioned in IRC);
I'll test it one out.
Thanks!
-Garrett___
