I would like to request that someone with access to
ftp://current.freebsd.org build a snapshot release based entirely on the
PRE_SMPNG CVS branch so those of us wishing to install current will have
a better starting point. The snaps currently being built come directly
from HEAD and hence are ridd
Brandon D. Valentine wrote:
> I would like to request that someone with access to
> ftp://current.freebsd.org build a snapshot release based entirely on the
> PRE_SMPNG CVS branch so those of us wishing to install current will have
> a better starting point. The snaps currently being built come d
John Baldwin wrote:
> Brandon D. Valentine wrote:
> > I would like to request that someone with access to
> > ftp://current.freebsd.org build a snapshot release based entirely on the
> > PRE_SMPNG CVS branch so those of us wishing to install current will have
> > a better starting point. The snap
On Sat, 16 Sep 2000, John Baldwin wrote:
> Err, AFAIK, the only instability atm is that under heavy load some ahc
> controllers seem to hang (or possibly the ahc driver is getting out of
> sorts and hanging.) However, the problem is not so bad that you can't
> build world in at most 2 boots, and
Wesley Morgan wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Sep 2000, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> > Err, AFAIK, the only instability atm is that under heavy load some ahc
> > controllers seem to hang (or possibly the ahc driver is getting out of
> > sorts and hanging.) However, the problem is not so bad that you can't
> > bu
On Sat, 16 Sep 2000, John Baldwin wrote:
>Err, AFAIK, the only instability atm is that under heavy load some ahc
>controllers seem to hang (or possibly the ahc driver is getting out of
>sorts and hanging.) However, the problem is not so bad that you can't
I've had a ton of experience with ahc l
Brandon D. Valentine writes:
> On Sat, 16 Sep 2000, John Baldwin wrote:
> >Err, AFAIK, the only instability atm is that under heavy load some ahc
> >controllers seem to hang (or possibly the ahc driver is getting out of
> >sorts and hanging.) However, the problem is not so bad that you can't
> I'
On Sat, 16 Sep 2000, Mike Meyer wrote:
>Brandon D. Valentine writes:
>> On Sat, 16 Sep 2000, John Baldwin wrote:
>> >Err, AFAIK, the only instability atm is that under heavy load some ahc
>> >controllers seem to hang (or possibly the ahc driver is getting out of
>> >sorts and hanging.) However,
You already have that - just install one of the -current snaps from
before this date. I have no plans to remove them.
- Jordan
> I would like to request that someone with access to
> ftp://current.freebsd.org build a snapshot release based entirely on the
> PRE_SMPNG CVS branch so those of us w
On Sat, Sep 16, 2000 at 03:01:28PM -0500, Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've had a ton of experience with ahc lately, as those of you who follow
> > -questions, -stable, or -scsi know. r1.48 of aic7xxx.c is horribly
> > broken. I can't get current snaps after that revision was commi
Vallo Kallaste writes:
> On Sat, Sep 16, 2000 at 03:01:28PM -0500, Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > I've had a ton of experience with ahc lately, as those of you who follow
> > > -questions, -stable, or -scsi know. r1.48 of aic7xxx.c is horribly
> > > broken. I can't get current sn
.
Valentine
Sent: Saturday, September 16, 2000 10:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PRE_SMPNG snap
I would like to request that someone with access to
ftp://current.freebsd.org build a snapshot release based entirely on the
PRE_SMPNG CVS branch so those of us wishing to install current will have
a
James Johnson wrote:
> Can someone explain why we have a PRE_SMPNG tag? Sure there may be some
> issues with SMP in -CURRENT right now, however simply avoiding running the
> code is not going to get those issues fixed.
It calms peoples fears, and because people asked for it. Generally, trying
to
13 matches
Mail list logo
