Alex Rousskov wrote:
> Polygraph is relatively easy to setup on FreeBSD for standard tests,
> using two PCs. Testing with more PCs, with non-standard workloads,
> and/or on a regular basis requires writing scripts and can get pretty
> evolved (which let's us sell a pre-configured appliance that doe
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
>Alex Rousskov wrote:
>One issue I have with Polygraph is that it intentionally works
>for a very long time to get worst case performance out of caches;
>basically, it cache-busts on purpose. Then the test runs. This
>seems to be an editorial comment on en
Jonathan Lemon wrote:
> In article [EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
> >Alex Rousskov wrote:
> >One issue I have with Polygraph is that it intentionally works
> >for a very long time to get worst case performance out of caches;
> >basically, it cache-busts on purpose. Then the test runs. This
> >seem
On Mon, 17 Feb 2003, Terry Lambert wrote:
> First, I just have a slight editorial comment, about cheating on
> Polygraph.
Terry,
This is not the place to start a long discussion about our
Polygraph testing methodology, but I have to say, with all due
respect, that many of your statements
