Re: Possible fix for rc.conf

1999-03-21 Thread Richard Wackerbarth
Why do we need to have ANY of the file inclusion in /etc/defaults/rc.conf? Shouldn't that file simply be definitions of variables? IMHO, the logic should be in rc itself. On Sat, 20 Mar 1999, Scot W. Hetzel wrote: What does everyone think about using this at the end of /etc/defaults/rc.conf?

Re: Possible fix for rc.conf

1999-03-21 Thread Stephen McKay
On Sunday, 21st March 1999, Richard Wackerbarth wrote: Why do we need to have ANY of the file inclusion in /etc/defaults/rc.conf? Shouldn't that file simply be definitions of variables? IMHO, the logic should be in rc itself. Yeah! What he said! Having code in rc.conf sucks. If there is no

Possible fix for rc.conf

1999-03-20 Thread Scot W. Hetzel
What does everyone think about using this at the end of /etc/defaults/rc.conf? for i in ${rc_conf_files}; do if [ $0 != $i ]; then if [ -f $i ]; then . $i fi else echo Error: $0 isn't allowed to re-load $i. echo Error: Please do not copy

Re: Possible fix for rc.conf

1999-03-20 Thread Rahul Dhesi
Scot W. Hetzel hetz...@westbend.net writes: if [ $0 != $i ]; then A more generic fix is for each script to set an environment variable, and check to make sure that variable was not set already. Analogous to how C include files prevent recursive inclusion. -- Rahul Dhesi

Re: Possible fix for rc.conf

1999-03-20 Thread Alex Zepeda
On Sat, 20 Mar 1999, Scot W. Hetzel wrote: If someone does copy the /etc/defaults/rc.conf to /etc/rc.conf, /etc/rc.conf will not reload it's self, thus it will never get stuck in an endless loop. Oh it's too late for that. :) - alex To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with