I noted the following after updating head to r226035:
...
stage 4.4: building everything
...
cc -O2 -pipe -Dxregcomp=regcomp -Dxre_exec=re_exec -Dxregexec=regexec
-Dxre_search=re_search -Dxre_compile_fastmap=re_compile_fastmap
-Dxregerror=regerror -Dxre_comp=re_comp
On 10/05/11 09:50, David Wolfskill wrote:
I noted the following after updating head to r226035:
...
stage 4.4: building everything
...
cc -O2 -pipe -Dxregcomp=regcomp -Dxre_exec=re_exec -Dxregexec=regexec
-Dxre_search=re_search -Dxre_compile_fastmap=re_compile_fastmap
-Dxregerror=regerror
On 10/05/11 10:48, I wrote:
Does this look right?
! ts = ((long)u - v 0) ? 0 : (u - v); \
Doh! It should probably be ..
ts = ((long)(u - v) 0) ? 0 : (u - v);
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
On Wed, 5 Oct 2011, Michael Butler wrote:
On 10/05/11 10:48, I wrote:
Does this look right?
! ts = ((long)u - v 0) ? 0 : (u - v); \
Doh! It should probably be ..
ts = ((long)(u - v) 0) ? 0 : (u - v);
This is definitely incorrect.
Consider the case where u = (int)INT_MAX, v =
