Trimmed CC a bit.
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 11:42:20PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
On Jun 23, 2014, at 8:24 PM, Glen Barber g...@freebsd.org wrote:
I sort of typed what I meant a bit backwards from what I intended to
write. What I meant (sort of) is, I would like to discuss our forward
On Jun 24, 2014, at 8:43 AM, Glen Barber g...@freebsd.org wrote:
Trimmed CC a bit.
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 11:42:20PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
On Jun 23, 2014, at 8:24 PM, Glen Barber g...@freebsd.org wrote:
I sort of typed what I meant a bit backwards from what I intended to
write.
On Sat, 21 Jun 2014 18:55:40 -0400, Glen Barber writes:
make make make -j8 -DNO_CLEAN buildworld
This is, IMHO, the worst solution I've heard on this topic so far.
I didn't say it was a good solution - but if you want -j you may not
have a choice (unless you fix src/Makefile).
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 9:00 PM, Warner Losh i...@bsdimp.com wrote:
OK. I must be daft, or maybe just missing something. But I can build 9.3
almost branch point on a current jail running on a 10.x system (to simulate
the 9 on current case). I don't see the problem being talked about at all.
On Jun 23, 2014, at 5:02 PM, Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 9:00 PM, Warner Losh i...@bsdimp.com wrote:
OK. I must be daft, or maybe just missing something. But I can build 9.3
almost branch point on a current jail running on a 10.x system (to
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Warner Losh i...@bsdimp.com wrote:
Which bombing out are you seeing (two or three have been sighted in this
thread)? And is this a nanobsd build, or a straight buildworld?
When building FreeNAS, with a hacked the nanobsd
script to does make make buildworld,
On Jun 23, 2014, at 5:19 PM, Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Warner Losh i...@bsdimp.com wrote:
Which bombing out are you seeing (two or three have been sighted in this
thread)? And is this a nanobsd build, or a straight buildworld?
When
Hi,
OK, I think I see the issue. I looked here:
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/stable/9/share/mk/bsd.prog.mk?view=log
and saw that dim@ MFC'd his EARLY_BUILD stuff in r257812.
That is why you can build stable/9 on a stable/10 host.
I am building FreeBSD 9.2 which doesn't have that change.
On Jun 23, 2014, at 6:15 PM, Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hi,
OK, I think I see the issue. I looked here:
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/stable/9/share/mk/bsd.prog.mk?view=log
and saw that dim@ MFC'd his EARLY_BUILD stuff in r257812.
That is why you can build stable/9
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 06:57:15PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
On Jun 23, 2014, at 6:15 PM, Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org wrote:
So, I guess that stable/9 can build properly on a stable/10 box.
For FreeBSD 9.2, there is no easy way out.
You’ll have to back port the patch then. We don’t
On Jun 23, 2014, at 7:12 PM, Glen Barber g...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 06:57:15PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
On Jun 23, 2014, at 6:15 PM, Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org wrote:
So, I guess that stable/9 can build properly on a stable/10 box.
For FreeBSD 9.2, there is no
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 07:42:27PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
On Jun 23, 2014, at 7:12 PM, Glen Barber g...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 06:57:15PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
On Jun 23, 2014, at 6:15 PM, Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org wrote:
So, I guess that stable/9
On Jun 23, 2014, at 8:24 PM, Glen Barber g...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 07:42:27PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
On Jun 23, 2014, at 7:12 PM, Glen Barber g...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 06:57:15PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
On Jun 23, 2014, at 6:15 PM, Craig
On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 03:05:05PM -0700, Simon J. Gerraty wrote:
Removal of EARLY_BUILD is not the issue here, I have no idea where the
hell the came into play.
It is a race in the chain with what make(1) gets built for the stable/9
userland. It is why the 'make make buildworld' thing I
Removal of EARLY_BUILD is not the issue here, I have no idea where the
hell the came into play.
It is a race in the chain with what make(1) gets built for the stable/9
userland. It is why the 'make make buildworld' thing I mentioned works.
IIRC all the fixes I put into src/Makefile to ensure
On 6/18/14, 4:05 AM, Simon J. Gerraty wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 11:35:42 -0700, Craig Rodrigues writes:
Do you know if there is some sort of patch that can be applied to
FreeBSD stable/9 sources so that it can be built on a FreeBSD
10/stable, or FreeBSD CURRENT
host with bmake?
You would
On Jun 18, 2014, at 4:32 PM, Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 11:59 PM, Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org wrote:
See r257658 which had fixed this, but it was reverted by Warner,
unfortunately. This was one of the uses of the EARLY_BUILD flag which
was *not*
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 10:00:03PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
On Jun 18, 2014, at 4:32 PM, Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 11:59 PM, Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org wrote:
See r257658 which had fixed this, but it was reverted by Warner,
On 18 Jun 2014, at 01:33, Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Glen Barber g...@freebsd.org wrote:
For what it is worth, I'm working around this problem by running:
# make
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 11:59 PM, Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org wrote:
See r257658 which had fixed this, but it was reverted by Warner,
unfortunately. This was one of the uses of the EARLY_BUILD flag which
was *not* redundant. :-/
Warner,
Is there a way to bring back the behavior of
On Jun 18, 2014, at 12:59 AM, Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 18 Jun 2014, at 01:33, Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Glen Barber g...@freebsd.org wrote:
For
On Jun 18, 2014, at 4:32 PM, Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 11:59 PM, Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org wrote:
See r257658 which had fixed this, but it was reverted by Warner,
unfortunately. This was one of the uses of the EARLY_BUILD flag which
was *not*
Simon,
Do you know if there is some sort of patch that can be applied to
FreeBSD stable/9 sources so that it can be built on a FreeBSD
10/stable, or FreeBSD CURRENT
host with bmake?
I'm trying to build a FreeBSD stable/9 jail on a FreeBSD 10/stable host, so that
I can build ports inside the jail
On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 11:35:42 -0700, Craig Rodrigues writes:
Do you know if there is some sort of patch that can be applied to
FreeBSD stable/9 sources so that it can be built on a FreeBSD
10/stable, or FreeBSD CURRENT
host with bmake?
You would likely need to apply many of the changes made in
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Simon J. Gerraty s...@juniper.net wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 11:35:42 -0700, Craig Rodrigues writes:
Do you know if there is some sort of patch that can be applied to
FreeBSD stable/9 sources so that it can be built on a FreeBSD
10/stable, or FreeBSD CURRENT
host
Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org writes:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Simon J. Gerraty s...@juniper.net wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 11:35:42 -0700, Craig Rodrigues writes:
Do you know if there is some sort of patch that can be applied to
FreeBSD stable/9 sources so that it can be built
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 8:35 PM, Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org
wrote:
Simon,
Do you know if there is some sort of patch that can be applied to
FreeBSD stable/9 sources so that it can be built on a FreeBSD
10/stable, or FreeBSD CURRENT
host with bmake?
I'm trying to build a FreeBSD
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 01:43:55PM -0700, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Simon J. Gerraty s...@juniper.net wrote:
Why not use fmake in that scenario?
That might work. Is using the devel/fmake port sufficient for using fmake?
If I typed make something, is there a
On Jun 17, 2014, at 3:14 PM, Glen Barber g...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 01:43:55PM -0700, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Simon J. Gerraty s...@juniper.net wrote:
Why not use fmake in that scenario?
That might work. Is using the devel/fmake port
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Glen Barber g...@freebsd.org wrote:
For what it is worth, I'm working around this problem by running:
# make make buildworld -jN [...]
Note the extra 'make', which rather than relying on the bootstrap-tools
to determine which make to build, I am
Sorry, I didn't speak to the problem you hit...
On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 11:35:42 -0700, Craig Rodrigues writes:
If I build like this:
env TARGET=amd64 TARGET_ARCH=amd64 make -j 9 SRCCONF=/dev/null
__MAKE_CONF=/opt/local/branches/freenas/os-base/amd64/make.conf.build
NO_CLEAN=1 buildworld
I get
Why not use fmake in that scenario?
That might work. Is using the devel/fmake port sufficient for using fmake?
So long as it is recent enough to have :tu and :tl I would expect so.
If I typed make something, is there a way inside the make environment to
detect if bmake or fmake was invoked,
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Glen Barber g...@freebsd.org wrote:
For what it is worth, I'm working around this problem by running:
# make make buildworld -jN [...]
Note the extra 'make', which rather than
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 04:33:11PM -0700, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Glen Barber g...@freebsd.org wrote:
For what it is worth, I'm working around this problem by running:
# make
Hi,
On a FreeBSD 10 host, I am trying to build this:
https://github.com/trueos/trueos
which is derived from FreeBSD 9.2.
If I build like this:
env TARGET=amd64 TARGET_ARCH=amd64 make -j 9 SRCCONF=/dev/null
__MAKE_CONF=/opt/local/branches/freenas/os-base/amd64/make.conf.build
NO_CLEAN=1
35 matches
Mail list logo
