hi.
>
> Does Linux do NFSv3 yet? I thought that at least
> until recently there
> were stability issues and it was recommended it not
> be used.
>
I had some problems with stale NFS handle when
NFS-mounting two FreeBSD 5.1 client (one with the
frozen 5.1 and one as of Oct. 10'th) to a Linux se
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 12:32:12PM -0400, Robert Watson wrote:
>
> On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, Josef Karthauser wrote:
>
> > I'm trying to set a FreeBSD 5.1 machine up as an NFS client. The
> > server is on an SGI box. Things are strange:
>
> Any chance you could grab a copy of ethereal and do a bit
* Josef Karthauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [031021 08:24] wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 03:33:37PM +0200, Bernd Walter wrote:
> >
> > You are root - and root is often mapped to nobody on the server.
> > Are you shure that nobody is allowed to see?
> > The ls -ld /mnt case is strange, but /mnt is al
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 03:33:37PM +0200, Bernd Walter wrote:
>
> You are root - and root is often mapped to nobody on the server.
> Are you shure that nobody is allowed to see?
> The ls -ld /mnt case is strange, but /mnt is already on the server
> namespace.
>
The linux boxes on the network don
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 01:09:18PM +0100, Josef Karthauser wrote:
> I'm trying to set a FreeBSD 5.1 machine up as an NFS client. The
> server is on an SGI box. Things are strange:
>
> phoenix# uname -a
> FreeBSD phoenix.mydomain 5.1-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT #0: Thu Sep 18 15:20:19
>
I'm trying to set a FreeBSD 5.1 machine up as an NFS client. The
server is on an SGI box. Things are strange:
phoenix# uname -a
FreeBSD phoenix.mydomain 5.1-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT #0: Thu Sep 18 15:20:19
GMT 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386
phoenix# ls
